Topic Closed  Topic Closed


Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed

my profile | register | search | faq | message board categories
calendar | chat | memberlist | moderator control panel
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
»
»
Hostboard   » Celebrities - Actors & Actresses   » Cherie Currie Message Board   » Give Peace A Chance! (Page 2)

Email this topic to a friend | Printable Version
This topic is comprised of pages: 1 2 3 4 5
 
Author Topic: Give Peace A Chance!
gus danger
Moderator


posted April 18, 2008 01:52 AM      Profile for gus danger   Author's Homepage   Email gus danger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
WASHINGTON - Some 300,000 U.S. troops are suffering from major depression or post-traumatic stress from serving in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and 320,000 received brain injuries, a new study estimates.

Only about half have sought treatment, said the study released Thursday by the RAND Corporation.

“There is a major health crisis facing those men and women who have served our nation in Iraq and Afghanistan,” said Terri Tanielian, the project’s co-leader and a researcher at the nonprofit RAND.

“Unless they receive appropriate and effective care for these mental health conditions, there will be long-term consequences for them and for the nation,” she said in an interview with The Associated Press.

The 500-page study is the first large-scale, private assessment of its kind — including a survey of 1,965 service members across the country, from all branches of the armed forces and including those still in the military as well veterans who have left the services.

Its results appear consistent with a number of mental health reports from within the government, though the Defense Department has not released the number of people it has diagnosed or who are being treated for mental problems. The Department of Veterans Affairs said this month that its records show about 120,000 who served in the two wars and are no longer in the military have been diagnosed with mental health problems. Of the 120,000, approximately 60,000 are suffering from PTSD, the VA said.

Veterans Affairs is responsible for care of service members after they have left the service, while the Defense Department covers active-duty and reservist needs. The lack of information from the Pentagon was one motivation for the RAND study, Tanielian said.

Problems affect more than 18 percent of troops
The most prominent and detailed military study on mental health that is released is the Army’s survey of soldiers at the warfront. Officials said last month that its most recent one, done last fall, found 18.2 percent of soldiers suffered a mental health problem such as depression, anxiety or acute stress in 2007 compared with 20.5 percent the previous year.

Too bad they don't discuss this stuff on Talk Radio and Cable News Shows!

GD

--------------------

Live long and prosper!


Back to Top
Posts: 8316 | From: West of the Pecos | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
SouthwestRanger
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted April 18, 2008 01:15 PM      Profile for SouthwestRanger   Email SouthwestRanger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by gus danger:
Too bad they don't discuss this stuff on Talk Radio and Cable News Shows!

GD

Gus let me answer that with the following quote from the movie
ZULU

Lieutenant John Chard: The army doesn't like more than one disaster in a day.
Bromhead: Looks bad in the newspapers and upsets civilians at their breakfast

Ongoing nomination fight hurting Clinton more than Obama

By CHARLES BABINGTON and TREVOR TOMPSON, Associated Press Writers

WASHINGTON (AP) — In a dramatic reversal, an Associated Press-Yahoo! News poll found that a clear majority of Democratic voters now say Sen. Barack Obama has a better chance of defeating Republican Sen. John McCain in November than Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

While Obama and Clinton are both sustaining dents and dings from their lengthy presidential fight, the former first lady is clearly suffering more. Democratic voters no longer see her as the party's strongest contender for the White House.

Voters of all types have gotten a better sense of Obama, who was an obscure Illinois legislator just four years ago. As more people moved from the "I don't know him" category in the AP-Yahoo! News poll, more rated Obama as inexperienced, unethical and dishonest. And 15 percent erroneously think he's a Muslim, thanks in part to disinformation widely spread on the Internet.

But Obama's positive ratings have climbed as well, while Clinton — widely known since the early 1990s — has been less able to change people's views of her. And when those views have shifted, it has hurt her more than helped.

The New York senator's ratings for being honest, likable, ethical and refreshing have fallen since January, and Obama scores higher than she does in all those categories.— AP News Survey Specialist Dennis Junius contributed to this report.

READ MORE AT....

http://news.yahoo.com/page/election-2008-political-pulse-obama-gains

--------------------

Let The Penguin Surf !


Back to Top
Posts: 562 | From: Juniper Creek, Utah | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
SouthwestRanger
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted April 18, 2008 01:45 PM      Profile for SouthwestRanger   Email SouthwestRanger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Brown upbeat on US ‘special relationship’
By Alex Barker and Andrew Ward in Washington

Published: April 17 2008 21:49

Gordon Brown heaped praise on George W. Bush with language evoking Tony Blair on Thursday, as he sought to overcome the impression that the “special relationship” had entered a cooler phase.

Speaking at a joint press conference in the White House Rose Garden, Mr Brown said he stood “shoulder to shoulder” with Mr Bush in a transatlantic bond that was “stronger than ever”.



“The world owes President Bush a huge debt of gratitude in leading the world in our determination to root out terrorism,” Mr Brown said.

READ MORE AT....

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c223f9d2-0cbc-11dd-86df-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1

Back to Top
Posts: 562 | From: Juniper Creek, Utah | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

gus danger
Moderator


posted April 19, 2008 12:58 AM      Profile for gus danger   Author's Homepage   Email gus danger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Day 1816 since "mission accomplished" was declared by the ******* !
The U.S. death toll is now 4038.
[Thumbs down]
Gus

Back to Top
Posts: 8316 | From: West of the Pecos | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
SouthwestRanger
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted April 22, 2008 01:48 PM      Profile for SouthwestRanger   Email SouthwestRanger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Bush's disapproval rating worst of any president in 70 years [Sad]


By Susan Page
USA TODAY


WASHINGTON — President Bush has set a record he'd presumably prefer to avoid: the highest disapproval rating of any president in the 70-year history of the Gallup Poll.

In a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll taken Friday through Sunday, 28% of Americans approve of the job Bush is doing; 69% disapprove. The approval rating matches the low point of his presidency, and the disapproval sets a new high for any president since Franklin Roosevelt.

The previous record of 67% was reached by Harry Truman in January 1952, when the United States was enmeshed in the Korean War.

Bush's rating has worsened amid "collapsing optimism about the economy," says Charles Franklin, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who studies presidential approval. Record gas prices and a wave of home foreclosures have fueled voter angst.

Bush also holds the record for the other extreme: the highest approval rating of any president in Gallup's history. In September 2001, in the days after the 9/11 attacks, Bush's approval spiked to 90%. In another record, the percentage of Americans who say the invasion of Iraq was a mistake reached a new high, 63%, in the latest poll.

Assessments of Bush's presidency are harsh. By 69%-27%, those polled say Bush's tenure in general has been a failure, not a success.

Low approval ratings make it more difficult for presidents to maneuver, limiting their ability to get legislation passed or boost candidates in congressional elections.

"The president understands war and the slowdown in the economy weigh down public opinion, but the situation in Iraq is improving, and the economy is about to get a big boost from the stimulus package," White House spokesman Scott Stanzel said.

Bush has had dismal ratings through most of his second term. His approval rating hasn't reached as high as 50% since May 2005. He has been steadily below 40% since September 2006.

Views of Bush divide sharply along party lines. Among Republicans, 66% approve and 32% disapprove. Disapproval is nearly universal — 91% — among Democrats. Of independents, 23% approve, 72% disapprove of the job he's doing.

Back to Top
Posts: 562 | From: Juniper Creek, Utah | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

SouthwestRanger
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted April 22, 2008 02:12 PM      Profile for SouthwestRanger   Email SouthwestRanger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
15 years ago the 51 day seige in Waco ended in a cataclysmic Firestorm that devoured the Branch Davidian Church and living quarters and gym.

80 people died at the end of the seige including a large number of small children who were in a buried bus shelter.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IemPsXZx-xM&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7aqWQvDc14&feature=related

And the victims of the Oklahoma City Bombing

Back to Top
Posts: 562 | From: Juniper Creek, Utah | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

gus danger
Moderator


posted April 24, 2008 12:42 AM      Profile for gus danger   Author's Homepage   Email gus danger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Day 1821 since "mission accomplished" was declared by the ******* !
The U.S. death toll is now 4047.
[Thumbs down]
Gus

Back to Top
Posts: 8316 | From: West of the Pecos | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
SouthwestRanger
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted April 24, 2008 03:40 PM      Profile for SouthwestRanger   Email SouthwestRanger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
I thought the following would lighten up this thread....

'Harold & Kumar Go To White Castle' creators take aim at the war on terror

Wednesday, April 23, 2008
BY LISA ROSE

Star-Ledger Staff


The comedy sequel "Harold & Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay" follows its stoner heroes on an outlandish journey from Hoboken to Cuba to Alabama to good ole Crawford, Texas.

Written and directed by Randolph natives Jon Hurwitz and Hayden Schlossberg, the picture offers a blend of satire, slapstick and trippiness. The adventure may be set in the South, but the filmmakers still incorporate memories of growing up in Jersey.

The title characters get sent to Gitmo after they're accused of bringing a bomb onboard a flight to Amsterdam.

The detainees escape, but that's only the beginning of the **** ride. With a hapless Department of Homeland Security chief (Rob Corddry) on their tail, they head for Texas, where they hope Kumar's ex-girlfriend (Danneel Harris) and her wealthy fiancé (Eric Winter) can help them clear their names.

The first movie, directed by Danny Leiner ("Dude, Where's my Car?"), tallied an unspectacular $18 million at the box office but found its following as a video rental. The studio, New Line, belatedly gave the team the green light for episode two.
The movie pushes the envelope with its surplus of sex, drugs and, er, more drugs. Yet the moment that made the suits nervous was a relatively tame scene in which the guys hang out with President Bush, played by an impersonator, James Adomian.

"There was a fear of having an impersonator in the film because if it's not done the right way, it could be a disaster," says Hurwitz.

"But for us, we love 'Naked Gun,' and a Queen Elizabeth impersonator is a huge part of the comedy at the end of that movie," says Schlossberg. "We treat Bush like a rebellious teenager. It was that concept mixed with the fact that we have an R rating so Bush can swear. That you cannot do on 'Saturday Night Live.'"

Lisa Rose may be reached at lrose@starledger.com.

Back to Top
Posts: 562 | From: Juniper Creek, Utah | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

gus danger
Moderator


posted April 25, 2008 12:04 AM      Profile for gus danger   Author's Homepage   Email gus danger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
As the death toll rises, I have no desire to "lighten" things up here!

Day 1822 since "mission accomplished" was declared by the ******* !
The U.S. death toll is now 4050.


GD

Back to Top
Posts: 8316 | From: West of the Pecos | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

SouthwestRanger
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted April 25, 2008 12:38 PM      Profile for SouthwestRanger   Email SouthwestRanger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Pelosi: Clinton, Obama sharing the ticket not a good idea Fri Apr 25,


WASHINGTON - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton shouldn't share the Democratic presidential ticket unless they really want to.


"No, I don't think it's a good idea," Pelosi said in an interview with CNN talk show host Larry King aired Thursday night.

"I think first of all the candidate, whoever he or she may be, should choose his or her own vice presidential candidate," said Pelosi, who will chair the Democratic National Convention in Denver in August. "I think that's appropriate. That's where you would see the comfort level on not only how to run, but how to govern the country.

"And there's plenty of talent to go around to draw upon for a good, strong ticket. I'm not one of those who thinks that's a good ticket."

But Pelosi added that if Clinton and Obama "think that it's a good ticket, maybe it is. But I don't think that we should thrust the vice presidential choice onto the presidential nominee. That's her or his decision to make."

Pelosi also said she agrees with Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean that the nomination should be settled before the national convention.

"I don't want a brokered convention. I think there's too short a time — maybe just about eight weeks between the end of the convention and the election. And I don't think that's enough time to bring everyone together," Pelosi said.

"I do think that the campaigns have to work their way through this, that we should have all the elections, let the people speak and then we'll find out who our nominee is."

The last Democratic primaries are June 3 in Montana and South Dakota.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080425/ap_on_el_pr/pelosi_campaign

SR: Gee...I wish it was November already

Back to Top
Posts: 562 | From: Juniper Creek, Utah | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

SouthwestRanger
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted April 25, 2008 02:51 PM      Profile for SouthwestRanger   Email SouthwestRanger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
urt Nimmo
Infowars
April 24, 2008

Limbaugh "dreams" of violence on par with that in Chicago in 1968.


It simply was not enough for neocon radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh to call for Republicans to vote for Hillary, supposedly as a hedge against Barack Obama. Now he is calling for riots in Denver during the DNC. ABC News in Denver reports:

Talk show host Rush Limbaugh is sparking controversy again after he made comments calling for riots in Denver during the Democratic National Convention this summer.

He said the riots would ensure a Democrat is not elected as president, and his listeners have a responsibility to make sure it happens.

“Riots in Denver, the Democrat Convention would see to it that we don’t elect Democrats,” Limbaugh said during Wednesday’s radio broadcast. He then went on to say that’s the best thing that could happen to the country.

In normal, non-Bushzarro times, Limbaugh would be arrested for inciting terrorism. But instead we live in times horrifically misshapen by a neocon reality — a reality of mass murder, torture of children, and the wholesale trashing of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.


After sane listeners — and I am not sure how regular listeners of Limbaugh’s show would be considered sane — called and complained about his comments, Limbaugh said: “I am not inspiring or inciting riots, I am dreaming of riots in Denver.”

It would seem Mr. Limbaugh has shared notes with “Re-create 68,” the COINTELPRO group that has vowed to make the convention in Denver more raucous and bloody than the Democratic Convention in Chicago, circa 1968. According to the Rocky Mountain News, the intel op masquerading as a grassroots activist group “is expecting up to 50,000 protesters from across the country [and] plans to march from Civic Center to the Pepsi Center, where the convention will be held, on Aug. 24, even though a parade route or a security zone hasn’t been announced.”

Is it possible Limbaugh will be with them?

Rush Limbaugh needs to be arrested as a threat to the peace. I’m not holding my breath, however, as neocons seem to have a get out jail free card and rabble-rousers such as Limbaugh and Savage are free to call for the most outrageous things, including violence and mass arrest of dissidents for the crime of exercising their rights under the First Amendment, now almost completely dead in the water.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=1706

SR: Yeah El Rushbo lets all laugh when the Cops and National Guard gun down some Soccer Mom and her kids for failing to stop properly at a check point or guffaw when the Cops smash several demonstrators into a permanent brain damaged state

And I'm sure Rush will be safe and sound somewhere just like he was during the Vietnam War he was so hawkish about but a "unknown" medical problem prevented him from joining ....

Back to Top
Posts: 562 | From: Juniper Creek, Utah | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

gus danger
Moderator


posted April 25, 2008 11:34 PM      Profile for gus danger   Author's Homepage   Email gus danger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post

______________

Back to Top
Posts: 8316 | From: West of the Pecos | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
SouthwestRanger
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted April 26, 2008 03:10 PM      Profile for SouthwestRanger   Email SouthwestRanger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
U.S. Attack of Sadr City Leaves 800 Dead

Laith Jawad
Azzaman
April 23, 2008

U.S. occupation forces have killed more than 800 people, most of them innocent civilians, in their three-week long military campaign to subdue the Mahdi Army in Sadr City, the leader of Sadr movement in Baghdad said.

Sheikh Salaman al-fariji said the troops have also injured more than 1,800 people and caused large-scale destruction of private property and the city’s rickety infrastructure.


Fariji made the remarks as he accompanied a delegation of 20 members of parliament on a tour of the impoverished city home to more than 2 million people.

U.S. troops have imposed a tight embargo on the city and bombing by war planes and helicopter gun ships in the densely populated Baghdad neighborhood continued even during the MPs’ tour.

Falah Shanshal, an MP, said the group would write to the parliament to lift the siege of Sadr City and reach a peaceful solution to the standoff with Mahdi Army.

Mahdi Army is the military wing of Sadr movement which has 30 deputies in parliament.

“The MPs were shocked by the scale of damage,” said Fariji.

Shanshal said: “The people of Sadr City undergo horrific humanitarian conditions as a result of U.S. military operations and embargo.”

http://www.infowars.com/?p=1707

Back to Top
Posts: 562 | From: Juniper Creek, Utah | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

gus danger
Moderator


posted April 26, 2008 08:43 PM      Profile for gus danger   Author's Homepage   Email gus danger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
WAR IS OVER...............................................................................if you want it! //-o\\


GD

Back to Top
Posts: 8316 | From: West of the Pecos | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

SouthwestRanger
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted April 27, 2008 03:50 PM      Profile for SouthwestRanger   Email SouthwestRanger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Cover Up of Veteran Suicide Rate

The Columbian
April 26, 2008


It almost always happens this way, doesn’t it? Some government official or agency gets mired in a scandal or foul-up and then turns cartwheels trying to hide the news. Ultimately, the attempted cover-up gets them in more trouble than the initial problem itself. (See: Richard M. Nixon and Watergate cover-up vs. Watergate burglary, 1972-1974.)

This pathetic dynamic is at play again this week with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, which misled Congress about the suicide rate of U.S. troops who served in Afghanistan and Iraq. Appropriately, Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., a member of the Veterans Affairs Committee, and committee chairman Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, have called for the resignation of Ira Katz, the VA’s director of mental health.

As the result of a class-action suit in San Francisco against the VA, internal VA e-mails surfaced this week showing Katz and others attempting to hide the magnitude of the veterans’ suicide problem.




This e-mail, dated Feb. 13 this year from Katz to VA Communications Director Ev Chasen, came in connection with a request by CBS News for an interview: “Shh! Our suicide prevention coordinators are identifying about 1,000 suicide attempts per month among the veterans we see in our medical facilities. Is this something we should (carefully) address ourselves in some sort of release before someone stumbles on it?”

Chasen answered: “I think this is something we should discuss among ourselves, before issuing a release.”

Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, who also has been looking into the suicide issue, called the cover-up “completely outrageous” and said the VA had previously reported that only 790 veterans under VA care had attempted suicide since 2007.

On April 3, Murray, who has long been looking out for veterans in numerous ways, was given the “Silver Helmet Award” by AMVETs for her work to help veterans in Washington and across the country. It was well deserved.

It would be nice if Murray and others in Congress could concentrate on dealing with veteran-related problems without having first to fight their way through cover-ups of those problems.

WATCH ALEX JONES’ ENDGAME ONLINE NOW in its entirety. View more High quality trailers at www.endgamethemovie.com

http://www.infowars.com/?p=1737

SR: Amazing isn't it ?

We send our Military People off with fanfare and pomp and promise them the world when victory is achieved but when it's all over they're treated no better than Foster Children.... [Sad]

Back to Top
Posts: 562 | From: Juniper Creek, Utah | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

charlie c
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted April 28, 2008 08:33 PM      Profile for charlie c   Author's Homepage   Email charlie c   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Very sad....where has the middle class gone?
The rich get richer, mission accomplished.

--------------------

"Information is not knowledge.
Knowledge is not wisdom. Wisdom is not truth. Truth is not beauty.
Beauty is not love. Love is not music. Music is THE BEST". Zappa from Joes Garage.


Back to Top
Posts: 1277 | From: Connecticut, usa | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
gus danger
Moderator


posted April 29, 2008 12:27 AM      Profile for gus danger   Author's Homepage   Email gus danger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Hi Charlie C. Nice to see ya and I hear ya bud!
Bush's compassionate conservatism has wrecked havoc on our wonderful country for nearly eight years now!
Ain't you glad he was elected selected?!?!
[Wilted Rose] [Broken Heart] [Sad] [Broken Heart] [Wilted Rose]
Gus

Back to Top
Posts: 8316 | From: West of the Pecos | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
SouthwestRanger
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted April 29, 2008 01:14 PM      Profile for SouthwestRanger   Email SouthwestRanger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
GD & C1: Read it and weep !!!!

Bush Blames Congress for Failing to Act on Energy (Update1)

By Roger Runningen

April 29 (Bloomberg) -- President George W. Bush blamed Congress for blocking his initiatives to mitigate rising energy costs by expanding domestic production and said lawmakers also are delaying action on other measures to address higher food costs and the mortgage crisis.

``It's a tough time for our economy,'' Bush said at a news conference today at the White House. While the public is demanding action, ``on many of these issues, all they are getting is delay.''

Bush said lawmakers have been ``vocal'' in opposing measures to expand U.S. oil production, including exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

He dismissed calls by to stop oil purchases for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. A group of 14 Senate Republicans earlier today asked Bush to stop filling the reserve to ease price pressures, matching a similar request previously made by Democrats in the House.

Bush said ``it is in our national interest'' to get the reserve filled, and halting purchases wouldn't lower the cost of oil because it amounts to 0.10 percent of global demand.

``I have analyzed the issue and I don't think it would affect price,'' Bush said.

Gasoline Taxes

In the presidential campaign, Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican John McCain propose a ``gas tax holiday'' by suspending the 18.4-cent per gallon federal gasoline tax and the 24.4-cent tax on diesel fuel. Democrat Barack Obama opposes a tax suspension, saying it will do little for consumers and divert money needed for highway and bridge repairs.

Bush said he would ``take a look'' at any proposals that may come from Congress. He said Congress would open more domestic land to oil exploration if it was ``truly interested'' in solving the problem of high gas prices.

Gasoline is averaging $3.60 a gallon nationally, up 66 cents from a year ago. Diesel, used by trucks that transport many goods to retailers, is at $4.24 a gallon, up from $2.92 last year, according to a survey by the American Automobile Association.

He declined to say whether the U.S. economy is in a recession.

``Economists can argue over the terminology,'' Bush said. ``The average person doesn't really care what we call it.''

Food Prices

On the rising cost of food, which Bush said is related to higher energy prices, the president said lawmakers also were partly at fault because they have failed to overhaul the ``massive, bloated'' farm bill. Now is the time for ``reducing unnecessary subsidies'' to wealthy farmers, he said.

``We are deeply concerned about food prices here at home,'' he said. This year, Bush said, the U.S. would be ``generous'' in food donations because of scarcities overseas.

He also called on lawmakers to act on his proposals to ease the housing crisis.

``Americans should not have to wait any longer for their elected officials to pass legislation to help more people stay in their homes,'' Bush said.

Home prices in 20 U.S. metropolitan areas fell in February by the most on record, pointing to an imbalance between supply and demand that shows no sign of ending.

Prices will probably keep sliding as foreclosures push even more properties onto the market just as stricter lending rules limit the number of qualified buyers. Shrinking home values have contributed to a slowdown in consumer spending that may already have tipped the economy into a recession.

To contact the reporter on this story: Roger Runningen in Washington at rrunningen@bloomberg.net

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=a2ysLBEUsUnw&refer=home

Back to Top
Posts: 562 | From: Juniper Creek, Utah | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

SouthwestRanger
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted May 01, 2008 01:07 PM      Profile for SouthwestRanger   Email SouthwestRanger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
White House admits fault on 'Mission Accomplished' banner


By TERENCE HUNT, AP White House Correspondent
Thu May 1, 3:40 AM ET



WASHINGTON - The White House said Wednesday that President Bush has paid a price for the "Mission Accomplished" banner that was flown in triumph five years ago but later became a symbol of U.S. misjudgments and mistakes in the long and costly war in Iraq.


Thursday is the fifth anniversary of Bush's dramatic landing in a Navy jet on an aircraft carrier homebound from the war. The USS Abraham Lincoln had launched thousands of airstrikes on Iraq.

"Major combat operations in Iraq have ended," Bush said at the time. "The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on Sept. 11, 2001, and still goes on." The "Mission Accomplished" banner was prominently displayed above him — a move the White House came to regret as the display was mocked and became a source of controversy.

After shifting explanations, the White House eventually said the "Mission Accomplished" phrase referred to the carrier's crew completing its 10-month mission, not the military completing its mission in Iraq. Bush, in October 2003, disavowed any connection with the "Mission Accomplished" message. He said the White House had nothing to do with the banner; a spokesman later said the ship's crew asked for the sign and the White House staff had it made by a private vendor.

"President Bush is well aware that the banner should have been much more specific and said `mission accomplished' for these sailors who are on this ship on their mission," White House press secretary Dana Perino said Wednesday. "And we have certainly paid a price for not being more specific on that banner. And I recognize that the media is going to play this up again tomorrow, as they do every single year."

She said what is important now is "how the president would describe the fight today. It's been a very tough month in Iraq, but we are taking the fight to the enemy."

At least 49 U.S. troops died in Iraq in April, making it the deadliest month since September when 65 U.S. troops died.

Now in its sixth year, the war in Iraq has claimed the lives of at least 4,061 members of the U.S. military. Only the Vietnam War (August 1964 to January 1973), the war in Afghanistan (October 2001 to present) and the Revolutionary War (July 1776 to April 1783) have engaged America longer.

Bush, in a speech earlier this month, said that "while this war is difficult, it is not endless." [Bat] [gulp] [Bat]

Back to Top
Posts: 562 | From: Juniper Creek, Utah | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

gus danger
Moderator


posted May 01, 2008 11:39 PM      Profile for gus danger   Author's Homepage   Email gus danger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Five years since "mission accomplished" was declared by that ******* !
The U.S. death toll is now 4065 and he is still making excuses about that "end of war" photo op!
It's disgusting!


GD

Back to Top
Posts: 8316 | From: West of the Pecos | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

gus danger
Moderator


posted May 01, 2008 11:46 PM      Profile for gus danger   Author's Homepage   Email gus danger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
quote:
Originally posted by gus danger:

There he is! The man responsible for all of that death and destruction!

I wonder how he sleeps at night?!?!
[hmmm]
GD



Back to Top
Posts: 8316 | From: West of the Pecos | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
SouthwestRanger
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted May 02, 2008 01:00 PM      Profile for SouthwestRanger   Email SouthwestRanger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Hey Gus...This Is Quite A Surprise !!!!


Fox News Host Guilfoyle Doubts Palfrey Suicide [wonder]

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
May 2, 2008




So shady is the “suicide” of Deborah Jeane Palfrey, even Fox News has questions. For instance, Kimberly Guilfoyle, a former prosecutor and talking head on Fox News, doesn’t buy the now commonly accepted — on corporate media venues, anyway — assertion that Ms. Palfrey was so depressed she went out in the car port of her mother’s mobile home and hanged herself.

Guilfoyle made mention of Palfrey’s appearance on the Alex Jones Show where she declared she would not commit suicide.

But Palfrey’s vow was not mentioned anywhere on the corporate media, with the recent exception of Fox News.

As Alex said on his show this morning, it is indeed a “strange world we live in” now that Fox has allowed Guilfoyle to cast apsersion on the official version of reality. [wonder] [hmmm]


http://www.infowars.com/?p=1882

Back to Top
Posts: 562 | From: Juniper Creek, Utah | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

Ol Sparky
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted May 03, 2008 01:13 PM      Profile for Ol Sparky     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Baghdad - Reports of the Iraqi Army's performance in the last month have ranged from proud to disastrous.

But with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki pursuing a fight with militias that has him squared off against the radical Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr – and with the drawdown of US troops continuing to pre-surge numbers this summer – Iraq's security forces may be facing their biggest test yet.

The Americans, who will fall back from more than 160,000 troops to about 140,000 by August, are asking the Iraqis to do more: lead more of the fighting, man more of the checkpoints, carry out more of the security missions on their own.

The question is, are they up to it? The answer will play a crucial role in the assessment the commander of US forces in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus, will make at the end of summer to decide if the drawdown of troops should continue. More long term, it will help determine how fast the US can safely withdraw most combat troops from the country.

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice seems to have no doubts about the answer. While in Baghdad recently to show support for Mr. Maliki's willingness to take on the militias she said that Iraqis "are, quite rightly, proud of their security forces and the way they've performed."

That contrasted with an assessment by British officers of the initial offensive against Mahdi militiamen in the southern city of Basra at the end of March. Their take: The Iraqi Army's performance was an "unmitigated disaster at every level." Earlier this month The Daily Telegraph quoted senior British commanders leveling those charges, and adding that the poor Iraqi performance would delay Britain's planned pullout from the southern region for "many months."

US commanders involved in the fighting in the Baghdad neighborhood of Sadr City this month have no such dire descriptions of the Iraqi units they oversee. But they do point to shortcomings the recent fighting revealed.

Among the weaknesses: a shortage of mid-level officers ready to lead troops, problems with the Iraqis properly supplying their own troops, and a lack of training and experience that shows up in soldiers shooting indiscriminately and in wild volleys when under attack.

"There have been some instances when they haven't performed as well as we'd want them to," says Col. Allen Batschelet, chief of staff for the Baghdad Multi-National Division. "We're definitely seeing some willing soldiers, [but] the mid level [of leading officers] has yet to be developed."

Iraqi military officials say the recent campaigns in Basra and Sadr City are being carefully analyzed.

"You have to remember this is a young army, and these were the first instances of our forces taking the lead against the militias, against the Mahdi Army," says Brig. Gen. Mohammed al-Askeri, spokesman for the Iraqi Defense Ministry. "Before, it was always Iraqis following the American lead."
____________________________________________
I think the British are much more honest in their assessment of the situation than Condoliar Rice and her ilk,
who lied us into this war in the first place
Ol Sparky

Back to Top
Posts: 112 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

SouthwestRanger
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted May 05, 2008 12:42 PM      Profile for SouthwestRanger   Email SouthwestRanger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
Tom Hanks announces support for Obama's presidential bid

OBAMA-HANKS IN 2008 !!!

NEW YORK (AP) - Tom Hanks is supporting presidential hopeful Barack Obama.

Hanks has taken to his MySpace.com page to pledge his support for Obama, who is competing to be the first black president. Obama, who faces rival Hillary Rodham Clinton for the Democratic nomination, has also been endorsed by Oprah Winfrey, Bruce Springsteen and Scarlett Johansson.

"As an official celebrity, I know my endorsement has just made your mind up for you," the 51-year-old actor says in a short video titled, "Beware: Celebrity Endorsement."

"History with a capital `H' is going to be made this November, no matter who the president-elect is. I want Barack Obama to be president of this country, a country that once said people with his skin color were only three-fifths of a human being."

Hanks, who won Oscars for his roles in "Forrest Gump" and "Philadelphia," explains his decision: "It's because of his character and vision, and the high road he has taken during this campaign. He has the integrity and the inspiration to unify us, as did FDR and Harry Truman and John F. Kennedy and even Ronald Reagan when they ran for the job."

The actor says Obama and Clinton have each "pretended to eat cheese-steak sandwiches and go bowling," "committed gaffes" and distanced themselves from supporters who could damage their campaigns.

But Hanks thinks an Obama presidency could bring about a "seismic shift," and "live up to the great promise once shaped by our founding fathers."

Signing off, the star says: "I'm Tom Hanks, I wrote and approved this message, and I'm now going to turn off the camera."


http://ktar.com/?nid=37&sid=827477
OBAMA - HANKS 2008 !!!

Back to Top
Posts: 562 | From: Juniper Creek, Utah | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

SouthwestRanger
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted May 05, 2008 01:54 PM      Profile for SouthwestRanger   Email SouthwestRanger   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post
9/11 Conspiracy Connection To DC Madam Murder ?

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Monday, May 5, 2008


Former NSA analyst and Navy intelligence officer Wayne Madsen tells the The Alex Jones Show that one of the key motives behind the DC Madam’s murder may have been the information her call girls picked up from Washington’s top brass concerning foreknowledge and government complicity in the 9/11 attacks.

Madsen also connected another suspicious death - that of former CIA agent Roland Carnaby who was gunned down by Houston police last week - to another individual who was involved in both the 9/11 cover-up and the D.C. Madam scandal, disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

Noting that Palfrey and her defense team had tried to invoke the Classified Information Procedures Act in the U.S. District Court in Washington, which is only used when classified information or the names of people who are intelligence officers needs to be discussed, Madsen said Palfrey, "Had information which could have a bearing on the 9/11 attacks that some of her employees may have picked up information beforehand that would have been very useful to the 9/11 investigation."

Madsen added that most of Palfrey’s call girls had been active around the area of McLean Virginia, which is where the CIA and other intelligence agencies are based and where Dick Cheney lived at the time.

Host Alex Jones recalled that during interviews Palfrey had told him that her escort service was in fact being used as an intelligence operation to gather intelligence on individuals who used the escort service, particularly those connected to the military.

Madsen, who spoke personally to Palfrey on numerous occasions, recalls one conversation where Palfrey told him, ‘I have information that would have been of great interest to the 9/11 Commission - there’s information that they have (her call girls) that would have been very important for the 9/11 Commission to know having to do with intelligence they picked up about 9/11 before it happened’.

The former NSA official noted that some of Palfrey’s call girls were being chauffeured by Sherlington Limousines to poker parties attended by former CIA director and co-chair of the Joint 9/11 Intelligence Inquiry Porter Goss. One of the reasons cited for Goss’ abrupt resignation in May 2006 was his alleged involvement in a prostitution scandal where lobbyists were holding parties for GOP lawmakers that featured hookers and gambling at the Watergate Hotel in D.C.

On the morning of 9/11, Goss was having breakfast with the head of Pakistan’s Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) General Mahmoud Ahmad, the man who ordered a wire transfer of $100,000 to alleged lead hijacker Mohammed Atta.

In addition, Madsen pointed out that Jack Abramoff, who was also connected to the DC Madam scandal, allowed at least two of the 9/11 hijackers to use one of his casino boats in the days before 9/11, and this is what Palfrey was probably referring to when she spoke about her call girls picking up information about 9/11 before it happened.

"There’s the link, when you’ve got Abramoff and you had two of those hijackers on his casino boat a few days before 9/11 - I just wonder if that’s what Jeane was talking about," said Madsen, "Because now I’m looking at this crazy incident in Houston with Roland Carnaby, a retired CIA guy who was still contracted to the CIA, being gunned down in broad daylight by the Houston police department - now I’ve been told by Agency sources in Houston that one of the people he was looking at was Abramhoff and the casino boats - so here you’ve got two people in the same week, looks like they were both assassinated in broad daylight," he concluded.

Many readers will recall that Newsweek reported that military brass in Washington received a warning the night before the 9/11 attacks which led to a September 11 flight being cancelled. "NEWSWEEK has learned that while U.S. intelligence received no specific warning, the state of alert had been high during the past two weeks, and a particularly urgent warning may have been received the night before the attacks, causing some top Pentagon brass to cancel a trip. Why that same information was not available to the 266 people who died aboard the four hijacked commercial aircraft may become a hot topic on the Hill," according to the September 13 2001 issue.

The connection to 9/11 is tantalizing and provides a key motive for why numerous power brokers would have wanted Palfrey to be shut up for good before she had the opportunity to release information in court that her call girls picked up about 9/11 pointing to foreknowledge and government complicity in the attacks.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=1930

Back to Top
Posts: 562 | From: Juniper Creek, Utah | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

All times are EST
This topic is comprised of pages: 1 2 3 4 5
 
Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
next oldest topic   next newest topic

Visit Our Web Sites!
Rocket City Records
Cherie Currie

Contact Hostboard | Hostboard | Privacy Statement

Copyright© 1999 - 2008 Hostboard.com All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
Ultimate Bulletin BoardTM 6.1.0.4