|
Author
|
Topic: O.T. You might be a hifi fetishist if....
|
bfish
Senior Hostboard Member
|
posted May 15, 2008 08:38 PM
Yeah, with the "potential" variable being the transport/drive quality. Another option is linking directly to another compatible part of your system that already has a good DAC, thereby foregoing an unecessary conversion.-------------------- bfish "We're going ALL the way, till the wheels fall off and burn!" Bob Dylan, from Brownsville Girl
Posts: 2053 | From: Arkansas | Registered: Dec 2004 | IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
| |
|
selmerdave
Senior Hostboard Member
Member Rated:
|
posted May 16, 2008 01:16 AM
quote: Originally posted by Richard C.: I decided to continue my question in this thread, rather than start a new topic.Anyway, I have noticed optical and coaxial digital outputs on some fairly cheap CD/DVD players. Does this mean that they have the "potential" of being decent "IF" they are connected to a DAC? Richard C. [ May 15, 2008 04:51 PM: Message edited by: Richard C. ]
Essentially what it means is that using the digital outs will bypass the output section of the player, presumably so you can use a much better output section in the form of a DAC. As bfish mentioned the quality of the transport will have an effect on the sound, but my money's with the output section. For what it's worth, I'm probably going to be trying something exactly like that in the near future. I have a very good CD player (CAL Tercet IV) with a dead transport, so I'm planning to use a cheap player as a transport and the output section of the CAL. I'll report back on how successful the results are, haven't got a hold of the donor transport yet.Dave -------------------- "When words fail, music speaks" - HC Anderson
Posts: 355 | From: Brooklyn, New York | Registered: Feb 2003 | IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
| |
|
|
|
|
Cal Weldon
Senior Hostboard Member
Rate Member
|
posted May 16, 2008 05:50 PM
You might be a fetishist if you own so many speakers you'll never get to use them all and have to store some of the stuff outside because there's no more room inside and there's no WAF to worry about and you still can't find a spot for it all. This is the speakers, not counting the amps and other stuff that all works yet never gets to see the light of day 'cause it's too far buried.There I feel better now. My name is Cal and I'm a speakerholic.
[ May 16, 2008 05:52 PM: Message edited by: Cal Weldon ]
-------------------- Nothing like a great big pair of speakers to make your day.
Posts: 142 | From: BC, Canada | Registered: Jan 2004 | IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
| |
|
|
|
selmerdave
Senior Hostboard Member
Member Rated:
|
posted May 16, 2008 10:14 PM
quote: Originally posted by timp: Some reported that adding a MSB dac did not make a noticeable difference. You may have to spend pretty good amount of money to hear the real difference. For those who are skeptical of exotic cd players take a look at this post. http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f7/goldmund-v-s-pioneer-285743/index3.html[/QB]
I don't know if that thread says more about high-end digital or internet forums...I'll say this, I have no problem whatsoever saying that good digital makes a huge difference. The difference between my good player and either the PS1 or my mass-market DVD player is enormous. IMO of course. I find it awfully hard to evaluate posted internet comparisons (as no doubt anyone would with my paragraph above ) after reading so many different and conflicting points of view. There are lots of "giant killer" posts out there, like how the PS1 in stock form bests $6,000 players. I have one, and it doesn't best much, which leads me to believe that anything that "beats" a $6k player might not sound any better than my PS1. My experience has been much closer in line with prices than the conspiracies would suggest, cheap players sound okay but like cheap players, good players sound better some of which will be to my taste and some of which will not. It basically means I'll take the marketing before I take the internet forum opinions. It's worth noting that the one post in that whole thread coming from someone who has heard both players reported that the sound of the expensive player was as different as the price, and in line with other players of that price. It's hard to give that too much creedence but there is no other opinion to challenge it. Dave
|
 |
Posts: 355 | From: Brooklyn, New York | Registered: Feb 2003 | IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
| |
|
|
O G
Senior Hostboard Member
|
posted May 18, 2008 07:03 PM
Exciters purposely color the sound. Convergence- all you are saying is you like colored sound. They do NOT improve accuracy- They "irritate" the ear in a certain manner, causing you to pay more attention. I would flatly recommend against their use. I did tours with major acts using those exciters- your ears are incredibly tired at the end of a gig. You just want to turn the thing off. -------------------- "There are four boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order."
Posts: 1941 | From: Ohio | Registered: Jun 2003 | IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
| |
|
|
O G
Senior Hostboard Member
|
posted May 19, 2008 12:42 AM
quote: Originally posted by CONVERGENCE: What it does to sound can be summed up as a sharpness maximizer................
Name one professional engineer who says that. Why do they discuss how the ear detects distortion in that paper? Because the unit intentionally introduces a distortion. Convergence you are just way off- it is an effect- it colors the sound. It is supposed to- it is sold to do that. If you like it and want to use it, that is one thing. But the way you present it is 100% wrong. I won't argue you wanting to use, it, just note that I wouldn't. But don't say it is something it is not- there we do have an argument.
Posts: 1941 | From: Ohio | Registered: Jun 2003 | IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
| |
O G
Senior Hostboard Member
|
posted May 19, 2008 12:56 AM
quote: Originally posted by Steve Mac: I've used them on a few recording sessions to sweeten an instrument during mixdown.
If you had lived thru hundreds of hours of Fleetwood Mac using an Aphex on the vocals you wouldn't use the term "sweeten". To me- it just grabs you by the shirt and yells in your face. A very impolite effect. Just a touch will bring out an instrument buried in the mix, spot on. But to have it on all the vocals the entire show....it was new then..people only heard it that night...except for us poor engineers who heard the show over and over... Maybe I should do a paper for AES on "exciter burnout" on the part of engineers, who develop a totally negative reaction to them after a certain amount of exposure. I've owned a number BTW, and yes have been guilty of using them when the customer called for them, or, as Steve said, very often used in the studio. But I would use as needed, not turn on and leave on the entire recording.
Posts: 1941 | From: Ohio | Registered: Jun 2003 | IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
| |
|
|
|
|