Post New Topic  Post A Reply

my profile | register | search | faq | message board categories
calendar | chat | memberlist | moderator control panel
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
»
»
Hostboard   » Electronics   » Altec User's Board   » O.T. You might be a hifi fetishist if.... (Page 3)

Email this topic to a friend | Printable Version
This topic is comprised of pages: 1 2 3
 
Author Topic: O.T. You might be a hifi fetishist if....
bfish
Senior Hostboard Member


posted May 15, 2008 08:38 PM      Profile for bfish     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah, with the "potential" variable being the transport/drive quality. Another option is linking directly to another compatible part of your system that already has a good DAC, thereby foregoing an unecessary conversion.

--------------------

bfish

"We're going ALL the way, till the wheels fall off and burn!"
Bob Dylan, from Brownsville Girl


Back to Top
Posts: 2053 | From: Arkansas | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
bfish
Senior Hostboard Member


posted May 15, 2008 08:42 PM      Profile for bfish     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
ooops....

[ May 15, 2008 08:43 PM: Message edited by: bfish ]

Back to Top
Posts: 2053 | From: Arkansas | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
selmerdave
Senior Hostboard Member

Member Rated:

posted May 16, 2008 01:16 AM      Profile for selmerdave   Email selmerdave   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Richard C.:
I decided to continue my question in this thread, rather than start a new topic.

Anyway, I have noticed optical and coaxial digital outputs on some fairly cheap CD/DVD players. Does this mean that they have the "potential" of being decent "IF" they are connected to a DAC? [wonder]

Richard C.

[ May 15, 2008 04:51 PM: Message edited by: Richard C. ]


Essentially what it means is that using the digital outs will bypass the output section of the player, presumably so you can use a much better output section in the form of a DAC. As bfish mentioned the quality of the transport will have an effect on the sound, but my money's with the output section. For what it's worth, I'm probably going to be trying something exactly like that in the near future. I have a very good CD player (CAL Tercet IV) with a dead transport, so I'm planning to use a cheap player as a transport and the output section of the CAL. I'll report back on how successful the results are, haven't got a hold of the donor transport yet.

Dave

--------------------

"When words fail, music speaks" - HC Anderson


Back to Top
Posts: 355 | From: Brooklyn, New York | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
bfish
Senior Hostboard Member


posted May 16, 2008 01:25 AM      Profile for bfish     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Some of the gaming consoles have awesome specs, but I've never had one to try. I remember a surge of interest in early PS3 units with lightly modded power supplies some time back. [thinking]

Back to Top
Posts: 2053 | From: Arkansas | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
selmerdave
Senior Hostboard Member

Member Rated:

posted May 16, 2008 07:32 AM      Profile for selmerdave   Email selmerdave   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Actually it's the PS1 that people like. I have one, and honestly I think it's merits in stock form are overstated. I tried modding mine and the transport stopped working... I have much experience with dead transports.

Dave

Back to Top
Posts: 355 | From: Brooklyn, New York | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

bfish
Senior Hostboard Member


posted May 16, 2008 12:40 PM      Profile for bfish     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Yeah, you're right, it was the PS1, thanks. It must've collided in my mental fog with the buzz over just getting a PS3.

I've never killed a CD transport (knock wood), I specialize in VCR tape drives, where the finale is often entertainingly violent.

I have a story on another member's experience with VCRs, but I'll spare him the embarrassment, and just say, "I told you so"...

Back to Top
Posts: 2053 | From: Arkansas | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

timp
Senior Hostboard Member


posted May 16, 2008 05:34 PM      Profile for timp   Email timp   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I see a transport as a turntable and a dac as a preamp. So if a source is bad then the rest is a modified bad source. I am ducking now. [shhh]

Tim

--------------------

Some where over the rainbow-upgrading will end?


Back to Top
Posts: 208 | From: Atlanta | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
Cal Weldon
Senior Hostboard Member


Rate Member

posted May 16, 2008 05:50 PM      Profile for Cal Weldon   Email Cal Weldon   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
You might be a fetishist if you own so many speakers you'll never get to use them all and have to store some of the stuff outside because there's no more room inside and there's no WAF to worry about and you still can't find a spot for it all. This is the speakers, not counting the amps and other stuff that all works yet never gets to see the light of day 'cause it's too far buried.

There I feel better now.

My name is Cal and I'm a speakerholic.

[ May 16, 2008 05:52 PM: Message edited by: Cal Weldon ]

--------------------

Nothing like a great big pair of speakers to make your day.


Back to Top
Posts: 142 | From: BC, Canada | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
selmerdave
Senior Hostboard Member

Member Rated:

posted May 16, 2008 06:50 PM      Profile for selmerdave   Email selmerdave   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I don't think that's a bad analogy, it's just a matter of how bad a "bad" transport is in terms of how much it affects the sound negatively. With a really cheap turntable you can have some seriously negative effects - resonances and instability that can significantly affect the signal transmitted. I'm not sure that a basic CD transport would be as detrimental, as I said I'll probably find this out for myself before long. I think it's likely that the difference in sound between a high-end and low-end output section (in terms of what's available today) is considerably larger than a high-end and low-end transport. I could be wrong, though.

Dave

Back to Top
Posts: 355 | From: Brooklyn, New York | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

timp
Senior Hostboard Member


posted May 16, 2008 09:02 PM      Profile for timp   Email timp   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Dave

I just got a used panasonic rp91 dvd/cd player thinking that it may be used as a transport. Some reported that adding a MSB dac did not make a noticeable difference. You may have to spend pretty good amount of money to hear the real difference.

For those who are skeptical of exotic cd players take a look at this post.

http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f7/goldmund-v-s-pioneer-285743/index3.html

Back to Top
Posts: 208 | From: Atlanta | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

bfish
Senior Hostboard Member


posted May 16, 2008 09:43 PM      Profile for bfish     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Cal Weldon:
You might be a fetishist if you...stored...buried...

Man, that cuts awfully close to the nut there Cal, were you talking about you or me?

My pile is largely awaiting some type of repair though, so there's the parts....OMG the parts!....THEEEE PAAAARTS!....

Back to Top
Posts: 2053 | From: Arkansas | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

selmerdave
Senior Hostboard Member

Member Rated:

posted May 16, 2008 10:14 PM      Profile for selmerdave   Email selmerdave   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by timp:
Some reported that adding a MSB dac did not make a noticeable difference. You may have to spend pretty good amount of money to hear the real difference.

For those who are skeptical of exotic cd players take a look at this post.

http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f7/goldmund-v-s-pioneer-285743/index3.html[/QB]


I don't know if that thread says more about high-end digital or internet forums...

I'll say this, I have no problem whatsoever saying that good digital makes a huge difference. The difference between my good player and either the PS1 or my mass-market DVD player is enormous. IMO of course.

I find it awfully hard to evaluate posted internet comparisons (as no doubt anyone would with my paragraph above ) after reading so many different and conflicting points of view. There are lots of "giant killer" posts out there, like how the PS1 in stock form bests $6,000 players. I have one, and it doesn't best much, which leads me to believe that anything that "beats" a $6k player might not sound any better than my PS1. My experience has been much closer in line with prices than the conspiracies would suggest, cheap players sound okay but like cheap players, good players sound better some of which will be to my taste and some of which will not. It basically means I'll take the marketing before I take the internet forum opinions.

It's worth noting that the one post in that whole thread coming from someone who has heard both players reported that the sound of the expensive player was as different as the price, and in line with other players of that price. It's hard to give that too much creedence but there is no other opinion to challenge it.

Dave

Back to Top
Posts: 355 | From: Brooklyn, New York | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

CONVERGENCE
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted May 18, 2008 04:42 PM      Profile for CONVERGENCE     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
There is one outboard equipment that makes an instant difference for CD players. I tried this with no EQ on EV pro sound tour equipment.
The difference is amazing The details in the recording jump right at you.

This is probably the easyest way . It does not color the sound but brings out the little details like cow bells chimes with out interfering with the rest of the program.

http://www.aphex.com/204.htm


................

[ May 18, 2008 04:43 PM: Message edited by: CONVERGENCE ]

Back to Top
Posts: 1083 | From: CANADA | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

vintageboris
Senior Hostboard Member


posted May 18, 2008 05:31 PM      Profile for vintageboris   Author's Homepage   Email vintageboris   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I've been using Tube Vitalizer (a very popular exciter built by SPL, a german producer of quality outboards like "Golden Mike" etc) for a long time in recording environments, as well as SR. The sound has more lively, sparkling quality.

Though, I do not use it as an "enhancing machine" while listening to vinyl or CDs, or else. SOmehow I like to use as few as possible devices between the media and my ears.

What I can confirm, is that good DACs can make a fine but still very significant difference e.g.for mastering jobs from multi-channel tape to DAT or HD.

Back to Top
Posts: 47 | From: Switzerland | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

O G
Senior Hostboard Member


posted May 18, 2008 07:03 PM      Profile for O G   Email O G   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Exciters purposely color the sound.

Convergence- all you are saying is you like colored sound.

They do NOT improve accuracy- They "irritate" the ear in a certain manner, causing you to pay more attention.

I would flatly recommend against their use.

I did tours with major acts using those exciters- your ears are incredibly tired at the end of a gig. You just want to turn the thing off.

--------------------

"There are four boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order."


Back to Top
Posts: 1941 | From: Ohio | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
CONVERGENCE
Senior Hostboard Member


Member Rated:

posted May 18, 2008 11:23 PM      Profile for CONVERGENCE     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What it does to sound can be summed up as
a sharpness maximizer.

Here is paper by the Audio Engineering Society that can shed some light on two devices Aural exciter and loudness maximizer.

http://www.aphex.com/pdf/papers/APHEX_AES_reprint_Chalupper.pdf

...............

Back to Top
Posts: 1083 | From: CANADA | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

Steve Mac
Senior Hostboard Member


Rate Member

posted May 18, 2008 11:56 PM      Profile for Steve Mac   Author's Homepage   Email Steve Mac   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Hey, if ya like it use it but it's an effects processor plain and simple. I've used them on a few recording sessions to sweeten an instrument during mixdown.

Back to Top
Posts: 406 | From: USA | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
O G
Senior Hostboard Member


posted May 19, 2008 12:42 AM      Profile for O G   Email O G   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by CONVERGENCE:
What it does to sound can be summed up as
a sharpness maximizer.

...............


Name one professional engineer who says that.

Why do they discuss how the ear detects distortion in that paper?

Because the unit intentionally introduces a distortion.

Convergence you are just way off- it is an effect- it colors the sound. It is supposed to- it is sold to do that.

If you like it and want to use it, that is one thing. But the way you present it is 100% wrong.

I won't argue you wanting to use, it, just note that I wouldn't.

But don't say it is something it is not- there we do have an argument.

Back to Top
Posts: 1941 | From: Ohio | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

O G
Senior Hostboard Member


posted May 19, 2008 12:56 AM      Profile for O G   Email O G   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Mac:
I've used them on a few recording sessions to sweeten an instrument during mixdown.

If you had lived thru hundreds of hours of Fleetwood Mac using an Aphex on the vocals you wouldn't use the term "sweeten".

To me- it just grabs you by the shirt and yells in your face. A very impolite effect.

Just a touch will bring out an instrument buried in the mix, spot on.

But to have it on all the vocals the entire show....it was new then..people only heard it that night...except for us poor engineers who heard the show over and over...

Maybe I should do a paper for AES on "exciter burnout" on the part of engineers, who develop a totally negative reaction to them after a certain amount of exposure.

I've owned a number BTW, and yes have been guilty of using them when the customer called for them, or, as Steve said, very often used in the studio.

But I would use as needed, not turn on and leave on the entire recording.

Back to Top
Posts: 1941 | From: Ohio | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

Cal Weldon
Senior Hostboard Member


Rate Member

posted May 20, 2008 03:15 PM      Profile for Cal Weldon   Email Cal Weldon   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bfish:
[QB]Man, that cuts awfully close to the nut there Cal, were you talking about you or me?

Well, never having the pleasure of meeting you I guess I was talking about me.

I am guessing there are many here that suffer the same. If you call that suffering that is.

Back to Top
Posts: 142 | From: BC, Canada | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

timp
Senior Hostboard Member


posted May 20, 2008 04:24 PM      Profile for timp   Email timp   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
In the case of the hi-fi fetishist the true object of his pleasure. the music, has been displaced. Or to put it another way, this pleasure has become dependent upon the particular characteristics of the audio equipment.
Hey, is the guy talking about altec speakers? hehe.

Tim

[ May 20, 2008 04:29 PM: Message edited by: timp ]

Back to Top
Posts: 208 | From: Atlanta | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

bfish
Senior Hostboard Member


posted May 20, 2008 05:02 PM      Profile for bfish     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Could be, if possession is more important than purpose.

Back to Top
Posts: 2053 | From: Arkansas | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?
vintageboris
Senior Hostboard Member


posted May 20, 2008 05:18 PM      Profile for vintageboris   Author's Homepage   Email vintageboris   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Let's say, the collector-investor seldom powers his machines up, at most once a year. That is the joy of possesing. Alas, as every possesion, it tends to lose attraction. Then he needs more.

I understand the people on this board mainly as connoisseurs*, that means also enjoying the consumption which "can be pleasing to the senses"

--------------------------------------------------

* "a person who has a great deal of knowledge about the fine arts, or an expert judge in matters of taste."

Back to Top
Posts: 47 | From: Switzerland | Registered: Jan 2008  |  IP: Logged | Problem w/ Post?

All times are EST
This topic is comprised of pages: 1 2 3
 
Post New Topic  Post A Reply next oldest topic   next newest topic

Contact Hostboard | Hostboard | Privacy Statement

Copyright© 1999 - 2008 Hostboard.com All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
Ultimate Bulletin BoardTM 6.1.0.4