Good work Mike. This is how we learn!
Too bad you don't have a 511 and a MR994 to throw that driver on.
Ron
Bear in mind, I'm an utter noob with measuring, but I really am interested in getting better and putting up some more quantitative info about Altec gear (I'm inspired by the work of Zilch, Earl, Vin, and others here). Taking some advice I've received, I did a full-sweep with low SPL to avoid any damage.
My test setup is pretty simple:
ECM-8000 $55
Blue Icicle USB preamp $40
Creative Labs SB1095 X-fi Pro USB external sound card $60 (this has a highly rated DAC for the money and doubles as a great replacement for my crappy laptop integrated sound)
Old laptop w/ windows XP
Mic Stand $20
XLR Mic cable $4
Holm Impulse Free
Mic and pre-amp calibration by CSL $75 (includes off-axis and polar response measurements)
I did the measurements with no filters inline whatsoever, just the test rig hooked up to an old Onkyo SS amp and straight to the 902.
Thanks Pano - I'll use your tips to rework a couple of the measurements. The pre-amp I'm currently using is pretty much useless below 100Hz anyway. I welcome and appreciate any other tips - I have done a ton of reading, but again, pretty new at this. I had used the filters in Holm on an earlier set of measurements on my M14s, and will try that again. It's probably best to also use a series cap to protect the driver if I up the SPL. I probably won't pull the 511 down from the garage - it's a heavy bugger to carry up there to my man cave
Earl - thanks for posting those graphs and the link to your gallery - there's some great info in there I've not seen yet. I will definitely be looking through that in some detail.
Edit: Here's an updated measurement. This is from the same driver; OEM 902 (PN 34635), manufactured in May 1980, with the original diaphragm (PN 34647). For these two measurements, I adjusted the sweep range to start at 100 Hz, added a Hi-Pass electronic filter (200 Hz) in Holm, and added a 49uF cap in series. I cranked up the SPL considerably and plotted the graph using 2dB amplitude scale.
Last edited by Alien_Shore; August 19th, 2012 at 01:10 AM.
- Mike
Good work Mike. This is how we learn!
Too bad you don't have a 511 and a MR994 to throw that driver on.
Ron
Enjoying Altec Speakers since 1972
That addition to your last post is interesting.
It shows me why Altec crossed the 416 over at 1200Hz in the Model 19. It also shows me why I cant put a 902 into my Valencia at the 800Hz crossover point.
Turntable : Yamaha GT 2000 - Cartridge : Soundsmith The Voice Ebony - Phono Stage : Moon LP5.3 - Preamp : Transcendent Sound Grounded Grid - Speakers : KRK Expose E8B.
Enjoying Altec Speakers since 1972
Well to my eye, on that graph the response at 800Hz is 5dB down from approx 1200Hz on the 811. If I was using a 902(which I have the GPA version of), I wouldn't put it on the Valencia using the 811 and the conventional Valencia 800Hz XO point. With an active crossover (like I use) it is a simple matter of adjusting the XO point and getting the output levels to blend with the 416Z. I wouldn't cross over at 800, given what I see in that graph. I'd be more inclined to use the 1200Hz crossover point that the Model 19 used.
Does that explain my statement, to you? That's my reasoning anywho.
Turntable : Yamaha GT 2000 - Cartridge : Soundsmith The Voice Ebony - Phono Stage : Moon LP5.3 - Preamp : Transcendent Sound Grounded Grid - Speakers : KRK Expose E8B.
If an 802/6 were measured and on the same graph and showed 5dB better at those frequencies, then yes, I would agree.
I suspect however that an 802/6 would look quite similar.
Remember that the model 19 used both 902 and 802 drivers depending on the year produced.
I think Altec switched to 1200 hz to keep the frams from blowing up. I may be wrong.
Ron
QUOTE=theophile;1841402]Well to my eye, on that graph the response at 800Hz is 5dB down from approx 1200Hz on the 811. If I was using a 902(which I have the GPA version of), I wouldn't put it on the Valencia using the 811 and the conventional Valencia 800Hz XO point. With an active crossover (like I use) it is a simple matter of adjusting the XO point and getting the output levels to blend with the 416Z. I wouldn't cross over at 800, given what I see in that graph. I'd be more inclined to use the 1200Hz crossover point that the Model 19 used.
Does that explain my statement, to you? That's my reasoning anywho.[/QUOTE]
Enjoying Altec Speakers since 1972
Frams blowing weren't so much an issue in HiFi. Live, yes. The 902 is a lighter driver, so is gonna resonate. I am speaking of the driver body, at lower freqs. The lower you cross any small Altecs, the less loudly you can play them. The heavier 802 does better than 806 and 900's. At 500 I REALLY suggest large format.
Your neighbors called. They like your music.
Or use dual 802s which yields more performance overall at less cost.
GM
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
I went by my storage shed and grabbed a 511b - ran a few more tests. These are all using the same 902 driver, on-axis, at 1m. Compares MR931 (blue), 811b (green), and 511b (red):
- Mike
Thanks for the graph. Kinda unexpected. I'd have guessed the plots for the 511 & 811 the other way, Hmmm....
Bookmarks