Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: N801 type crossover build for 878B Santiagos

  1. #31
    Hostboard Member xinu's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 3rd, 2017
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    46
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: N801 type crossover build for 878B Santiagos

    ^Thanks GM that was very informative and better yet made a lot of sense to me.

    In terms of AMD, can a relatively low sensitivity LF driver in an enclosure designed with the correct amount of acoustical damping perform as well as a high sensitivity driver in the appropriate cab for it?

    No doubt the low efficiency driver will require an order of magnitude more power to produce the same SPL to overcome enclosure damping and cone mass. I’m sure there are other deficiencies to consider as well.

    Surprisingly I don’t notice my 411B cones moving when they’re playing the lower octaves. Good to know that the absence of cone movement can be a good thing
    Last edited by xinu; January 28th, 2017 at 04:34 PM. Reason: correction

  2. #32
    Senior Hostboard Member GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 26th, 2002
    Location
    Chamblee, Ga.
    Posts
    4,930
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    43 Post(s)

    Re: N801 type crossover build for 878B Santiagos

    You're welcome!

    Of course! It just means it won't play as loud [less dynamic headroom] or if it can handle more power to make up for it can't be used as high in the HF.

    Hmm, it should unless the signal doesn't go low at a high enough level and/or you listen at a low SPL and/or the signal is highly compressed and/or there's a cab leak with this being fairly common IME with Altec's consumer cabs.


    GM
    Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.

  3. #33
    Hostboard Member xinu's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 3rd, 2017
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    46
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: N801 type crossover build for 878B Santiagos

    Finished and installed the left crossover and recapping the 30904 today.

    Been listening and tweaking a bit. I would say this build was well worth the effort. Much smoother mid range and the bass sounds nice and firm.

    Unfortunately the listening room is not well suited for speaker positioning. The left is probably too close to the side wall and right side wall is a fair distance from the other. But I am surprised how well they work in this irregularly shaped room. I?m in desperate need of a man cave with heat for the next project. Very interesting treads here on A7s and MLTLs. For now I play around and see if it gets better with bi-amping.



    Greg
    Attached Images Attached Images

  4. #34
    Senior Hostboard Member
    N801 type crossover build for 878B Santiagos


    Phil-G's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 1st, 2013
    Location
    restaurant at the end of the universe
    Posts
    1,616
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    36 Post(s)

    Re: N801 type crossover build for 878B Santiagos

    hey, who needs a dining room table?
    Sonic Barbarian

  5. #35
    Hostboard Member xinu's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 3rd, 2017
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    46
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: N801 type crossover build for 878B Santiagos

    ^Exactly! A waste of space. Used 5 times a year (maybe). A couple of card tables and fold up chairs could easily do the job when needed

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 20820612 times.