Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: model 19 clone box for my A7 500Hz components?

  1. #21
    Hostboard Member kipduff's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 4th, 2015
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    67
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: model 19 clone box for my A7 500Hz components?

    Quote Originally Posted by gdmoore28 View Post
    Hi Kiduff -

    Been following along with your progress. How about some pics of what you are working with? I know, I know - if you've seen one . . . but photos sort of personalize the experience for us.

    Keep us updated!

    GeeDeeEmm
    So here is the original eBay listing that I turned into PDF. In the eBay pictures, they appear original grey- I think he took them before he painted them. In the second link where I'm discovering that the XOs are screwed, you can see now they are a very dark grey. I'm building panels to mount behind original XO mount area to adapt the '66 XOs temporairily. Just received some Cardas Patented Binding Posts which I will try out in these. It's amazing how many binding posts that are out there- and I don't really like any of them. Russian MBGOs on their way for quick XO repair. I will post more later with questions. These are in pretty good shape I think. Mostly 5/8" particle board- back is 3/4" as are some other panels.


    Dropbox - A7:828 cabinets bought off eBay 2017 09 21.pdf
    2017 09 29 2981 testing.jpg
    Dropbox - 2017 09 29 2983 XO disassembled.jpg

  2. #22
    Hostboard Member kipduff's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 4th, 2015
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    67
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: model 19 clone box for my A7 500Hz components?

    Quote Originally Posted by GM View Post



    http://www.lansingheritage.org/image...ign/page15.jpg


    http://www.lansingheritage.org/image...ign/page16.jpg

    Regardless, I've learned the hard way never to trust polarity markings because in my then teen youth I thought the Altec distr. was 'jerking my chain' about never trusting them, so long since been ignoring them, using a battery or impulse test to find which terminal attached to 'battery +' blows a piece of toilet paper or similar forward/away from the driver face [compression stroke in acoustic speak, rarefaction stroke on intake] as opposed to the diaphragm's relationship to the motor and mark it 'positive' or '+' with something that will stand out at a glance. Ditto anything polarity centric if you have to use any sort of magnifying glass to see tiny markings and/or didn't pay attention when replacing them .



    As you can see, Altec's way can be quite confusing, especially as to when to reverse polarity; better to understand the basics, i.e. for each XO slope order there's a 90 deg phase shift [lag], so with a 2nd order the HF is lagging behind 180 deg out of electrical phase, but if you reverse the HF's polarity, it's now in phase, though still lagging in time by however many milliseconds [ms] of the XO frequency [~SoS/(4/slope order)/XO frequency].


    Note that all of this for HIFI/HT is kind of bogus due to small room acoustics and other variables like the acoustic center of a compression driver rests on its phase plug and moves forwards/backwards with frequency on a point source, so only accurate at one frequency; plus a point source starts with a 90 deg phase lag relative to a compression driver, so either the acoustic centers need to be gapped an extra 90 deg relative to a compression driver or use a 3/2 slope order XO.


    Historically then, the typical DIYer tried swapping polarity of a speaker's HF [mids, then HF to mids for three way] and whichever one sounded best was the right one regardless of markings, theory.


    Explanation of Time Aligned and Linear-Phase? - diyAudio


    You're welcome!

    GM


    Thanks GM. Will take me a while to digest this obviously.
    I am making a MSWord NOTES document where I cut and paste web info for easy access- and this post is going in there for future reference.

    On this subject- just got back my re-coned/regaussed 604-8Hs from GPA. Broke em in a little with about 4 hours of a break-in disc I have. Just tried them with the polarity reversed from indication on the GPA N-604-8A XOs. Seems better. I will let them break in and do another A-B. New suspension on these seems stiff- I believe Fs is now about 33Hz- original Fs on 8H is 28Hz I believe.

  3. #23
    Senior Hostboard Member GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 26th, 2002
    Location
    Chamblee, Ga.
    Posts
    4,930
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    43 Post(s)

    Re: model 19 clone box for my A7 500Hz components?

    You're welcome! Ran out of time to include physical offsets, but this procedure works well enough for positioning a horn or finding the ~correct XO point for a fixed position: https://audioroundtable.com/misc/Altec_AN-9.pdf

    GM
    Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 21008644 times.