Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Altec 402 version opinions?

  1. #1
    Senior Hostboard Member Audio_by_Goodwill's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 9th, 2004
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    2,155
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Altec 402 version opinions?

    Like the 755, the 402 was revised over the years. Currently there is a pair of 402C on ebay.... Excellent-Condition-ALTEC-402C-16-ohm-serial-391645
    I have a pair of 402s in my 835A Monterey Jr.s, but I don't recall which letter version..... A or B?

    I'm wondering if there is a significant difference in desirability between the versions..... sonically or monetarily?
    Audio_by_Goodwill
    Michigan, USA

  2. #2
    Senior Hostboard Member GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 26th, 2002
    Location
    Chamblee, Ga.
    Posts
    4,930
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    43 Post(s)

    Re: Altec 402 version opinions?

    Should be a 'B':

    http://www.hifilit.com/Altec/1959-i.jpg

    http://www.hifilit.com/Altec/1959-j.jpg

    In general; much later driver versions had specs 'juggled' to work 'good enough' in earlier speaker designs, but ideally needed either [more] EQ and/or a complete redesign.

    GM
    Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.

  3. #3
    Senior Hostboard Member Audio_by_Goodwill's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 9th, 2004
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    2,155
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Altec 402 version opinions?



    Thank you for those links. The last time I tried visiting that site none of my old links worked.

    If the B dates to 59, how early was the A? Off the top of your head, do you have any ideas of it's origins?

    In general; much later driver versions had specs 'juggled' to work 'good enough' in earlier speaker designs, but ideally needed either [more] EQ and/or a complete redesign.

    It's sad when that happens. So often our modern products have a hard time measuring up to reasonable customer expectations because "good enough" has been taken to the extreme.
    Audio_by_Goodwill
    Michigan, USA

  4. #4
    Senior Hostboard Member GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 26th, 2002
    Location
    Chamblee, Ga.
    Posts
    4,930
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    43 Post(s)

    Re: Altec 402 version opinions?

    No clue; my Altec speaker 'association'/'pashion' began in '52 with these except with an 1804 tar filled horn, though at age 6 wouldn't learn this till much later, so never paid much attention to anything not big with at least one horn except when someone wanted help with their consumer gear: http://www.lansingheritage.org/image...vott/page3.jpg

    A lot of catalog, in-depth knowledge was available in early postings on the net that are long gone now unless the early net archives still exists and will someday be made available again.

    GM
    Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 21008644 times.