-
Re: Impeachment?
What is she a secretary for a real agent or something?...please. She's obviously not very good at her job if she is blabbing what info they will allow her to have to you.
SunTzu, I dont think I have ever been in more agreement with a person on this board. It seems like you read my mind with your last post but made it better.
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
-
Re: Impeachment?
We are the lone voice in a voice of many.
We come to the defense of may. Was Bush right for Iraq. I will debate that. Because if it wasn't Iraq it would be Iran or Pakistan or some other nation.
It was about a person and a hatred and money that started this. So you know cut them off. Their money and let their hatred drive them. Sooner or later they will be found. And hopefully dead and not alive.
Spudmac a liberal. Yeah with level the place for a new parking lot. Sound like a liberal? No a parent. Such as myself who, well don't mind their son serving their country. But not in a limited war like Vietnam or Korea.
If it's worth going to war over, by God, it's more than worth winning and not stopping till the enemy admits defeat.
We stand mostly alone to defend those who cannot defend themselves.
I don't agree we should do it alone. I thought that was what NATO and other alliances were about. I wish we were out of Iraq and Afghanistan. And in time we will be.
But give our troops a chance to do what they must. Defeat the opposition. If not no matter who the president is, his agenda and war is already lost. Johnson would not lead the US after Nam got to hot. So in come a president who had a peace plan. Yet it still took how long.
We can ill afford another Nam or Korea. Time to end this i'll hold a whole country terror.
You end that by ending those who rule terror. Seek out and destroy. Once destroyed. Keep them dead. No resurrections. There are no new Jesus's as i know of.
-
Re: Impeachment?
well my parents were invited to go to the white house 2 years ago for xmas, she must be doing good enough of a job. You can say what you want, but you dont have any proof to discredit me, nor do i really care to prove my point. Regardless of my relationship to someone that close, there are many many people that say bush invaded iraq in defense of his father, I dont see how thats giving out any secret plan, hell half the damn world knows that einstein.....not only that, but when was the last time the US invaded a place without oil? Im guessing maybe panama? Thats a long time ago, if there are not agendas with this war then why are we still there obviously there are no wmds, where are they, huh, where, show me some wmd's and ill not say half as much....It has nothing with me being anti american, im very much american, but you cant tell me george bush is anything special as a president. It doesnt mean im not amercian, it just means that i dont like his candy ass. Like GCdevil said, George Washington, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson didnt like King George III, yet they dont catch the grief that I catch for speaking out against Bush. Bin Laden didnt blow up the projects or half the welfare line in Buchanon County and places like that, Saddam didnt cause americans to be homeless and jobless and create a huge deficit in the economy........now Bush is getting ready to bring humanitary aid to africans, just as his father did in somalia.....10 bucks says the countries he aids have ties to the exportation of Oil just like Somalia did. Thats the bush administration, they say one thing but there is always hidden agendas.
-
Re: Impeachment?
Ha ha , I said this before and I'll say it again- I talk TOO much. This, Iraq started out pretty fast but has bogged way too much, how long did the troops sit around Fallujah before they moved? A reason, perhaps? As far as the media being slanted, if it was, Bush would be gone already. This info has been around quite awhile, even I KNEW, but kept quiet till the Brits went public. Most just keep the blinders on. The oil prices are raising funds for the terrorists and the oil bottle neck is straight from the LACK of Refineries- do the research... just keep it thrifty as possible , please in terms of lives first, and feeding our own folks and taking care of them. I don't care who is pres , till the next election anyway [img]/LDPforum/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]- it can't be changed anyway. There was a WHOLE LOT about KERRY that I didn't like, but after checking what had been going on in Texas and the law changes for Enron and their educational system, which were declared illegal a short time ago, well you can see for yourself if you wish. Anyway, I just don't see myself as the "classic liberal" . I wouldn't waste the time and manpower, that have been. See Ya, Spuds PS LPDFTBL knows me better than anyone else on here, he might be right. [img]/LDPforum/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
-
Re: Impeachment?
This war will be looked back upon much like Vietnam was.
-
Re: Impeachment?
I don't know of any Bush administration policies that have hurt the economy in SWVA . Nafta has hurt us all but that was in place in '94 , I'm sure it has benefitted Mexico and Canada more than us . Increasing Medicare benefits , the war on terrorism , recession , lack of trade tariffs on China ( just check thru your house or apt. and see how much was made outside the US you'll be surprised )and most importantly our government has yet to learn how to cut spending . The budget grows by leaps and bounds with no more money coming in short of tax hikes . I can't speak for anyone else but I don't want any part of a tax hike . The politicians need to learn how to balance a checkbook . You cannot get out of a deficit situation without cutting spending , Econ 101 . I don't know about world economy but I know our society enjoys less expensive products that can be produced pennies on the dollar as compared to being manufactured domestically . That mentality has hurt union type jobs that pay well and sent them South or overseas . Coal is no longer king and SWVA relied virtually 100% on it . NC has been hurt by tobacco and textiles . These trends have been in place thru several administrations and I'm not sure when the tide will turn.
-
Re: Impeachment?
The tax cuts that favored the rich were his(Bush) first mistake. It amounts to the Mega-rich sending the skilled trade jobs to slave labor countries. In the last 20 years our debt as a nation has grown to much. The pension funds are now popular targets for CEO's to rob .
-
Re: Impeachment?
</font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
I would do anything to get out of the states.
[/ QUOTE ]
go for it buddy..no1 is stopping you..catch the next flight out
-
Re: Impeachment?
I'm going to make a few calls and check this out. If we have people in the CIA dogging the Commander-in-Chief, it's time he cleaned house. Hope your aunt has enough years in to retire!!!!!!!!!
-
Re: Impeachment?
Glad I have your permission. Im sure in England I would be around more intelligent people than yourself.