Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: "films not dead! Damn it!"

  1. #1
    Inactive Member seekaee's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 27th, 2001
    Posts
    157
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Should be the warcry for everyone in here [img]smile.gif[/img]

    Anway, check out this article below of the same same title on salon.com.

    http://archive.salon.com/ent/movies/...ematographers/

  2. #2
    Inactive Member Matt Pacini's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 27th, 2001
    Posts
    567
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    It just goes to show how effective the hype is, from the digital video manufacturers, when even people I run into that know nothing whatsoever about moviemaking technology, think that all movies are now made digitally.

    They look at me like I'm nuts when I tell them that 99.9% of every movie they've ever seen, and are distributed now, are shot on film.

    This whole "film is dead" is just so much B.S.
    It's not true now, and won't be for a loooooonnnggg long time.

    It's like saying that the rainforest is all gone, or that the oil is all gone, etc.,
    There have been so many other predictions that have come and gone...
    Remember "virtual reality"? or better yet, "virtual sex"?
    Nobody even uses these terms anymore, but a few years ago, you couldn't watch TV for 2 days without seeing some story on how life as we know it, or sex as we know it, was going to be totally changed because of this, and it's just so ludicrous.

    When I'm asked why I don't shoot DV, I just say "DV is terrific in every way but one: it doesn't look good."

    Of course, that's not entirely true. It's also bad in another way: Its inherently temporary archival ability.
    With film, all you need is a light and a lens.
    In 5 or 10 years, DV will be considered just as impressive as Hi-8 or 3/4 inch video is now.
    Think about it...

    Matt Pacini

  3. #3
    TastinGood
    Guest TastinGood's Avatar

    Post

    Digital is like film...only better.

  4. #4
    Inactive Member seekaee's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 27th, 2001
    Posts
    157
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    it is? Please explane why...

  5. #5
    TA 152
    Guest TA 152's Avatar

    Post

    Apparently some preffer inflateable Anna over the real thing. [img]eek.gif[/img]

    R

  6. #6
    Inactive Member Skyliner's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 9th, 2003
    Posts
    32
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Even if they were identical the guy paying ten bucks a minute will be composing better shots that the guy paying 2 cents [img]graemlins/idea.gif[/img]

  7. #7
    Inactive Member Matt Pacini's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 27th, 2001
    Posts
    567
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Originally posted by TastinGood:
    Digital is like film...only better.
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">... if that's true, can you please tell me why 99.99999 percent of all movies professionally made are still shot on film?


    Steven Speilberg "I'll stop shooting film when they close the last lab down".

    Matt Pacini

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •