<font size="2" face="verdana, arial">Here's a school leason on war for you.Originally posted by regoddamndiculous:
how was I supposed to respond to a childish post? Your arguments on other threads are ignorant and show your immaturity. You don't know shit about politics, war, or history. Go back to school fool!
French and Indian War - Kill the Indians and drive off the Frenchies yet Britain won't let us have the land. Verdict: pointless
American Revolution: Rich colonists don't want to pay taxes. Oh yeah, Canada was under British control too. I don't remember a Canadian Revolution. Verdict: Pointless
War of 1812: Lets take Canada! Bad idea. US had to fight to avoiding lossing land. Verdict: pointless
Mexican-American War - Lets take Mexico's land because they killed those that tried to take their land. (see Spot resolutions) Verdict: pointless
Civil War - Debatable. We would have just let the South secede, but war kept the nation together and ended slavery. The death toll was massive however. Verdict: questionable
Spanish-American War - "Remember the Maine, to hell with Spain" Lets blame adisaster on the Spanish so that we can go into Cuba, take their resources and implement American democracy. (see any parallels here) Verdict: Completely pointless
WWI - The Lusitania was carrying ammunition. Stupid war. We should have stayed out of it. Verdict: again, pointless
WWII - Here's where you get one bud. This war was actually for something although the internment camps for Japanese Americans and the A-bomb compromise our moral high ground. Verdict: Good cause, bad methodology
Korea and Vietnam - Not actually wars but police actions. Nothing accomplished. Yeah. Verdict: Pointless
Now that I gave you that lesson in history, lets see you debate some facts. You are the one showing immaturity by saying we should kill a bunch of people and acting like a blood thirsty jingoist. Post a decent response with facts in it or get the hell out.
Bookmarks