Which was a better year for music? 2003 or 2002?

**Cotton Candy Lover** · January 29th, 2004, 10:08 PM

I'm going with 2002, personally. Just too many bands that made my skin crawl last year. [img]wink.gif[/img] I will withhold their names for the protection of them and you. Your opinions?

**midnightangel** · January 30th, 2004, 08:57 AM

I would have to say 2003 yeah there were a few crap bands on the seen but we saw the return of FP, PBF and tigertailz

**Cotton Candy Lover** · January 30th, 2004, 09:19 AM

Originally posted by midnightangel:
I would have to say 2003 yeah there were a few crap bands on the seen but we saw the return of FP, PBF and tigertailz

<font size="3" face="Arial">But how many of those three released a cd in 2003? I know that TT did that new release (was that old or new stuff?). I don't think either of the other two released anything, did they?

**midnightangel** · January 30th, 2004, 09:23 AM

No they didn't to be honest but they did do several amazing tours
Release wise possible 2002 which saw the start of RB & BC ....oh it is a tough one

**CanGLAMada** · February 1st, 2004, 07:03 PM

Hi,
2003 for sure, it seems i can't keep up with all the releases and so far 2004 is looking good for GLAM/SLEAZE /MELODIC HARD ROCK, so keep the GLAM banner flying support the groups by going to a show,buy a cd or shirt,or just e mail the group to show your support!!!

**Stacey0471** · February 2nd, 2004, 03:08 AM

But how many of those three released a cd in 2003? I know that TT did that new release (was that old or new stuff?). I don't think either of the other two released anything, did they?

<font size="3" face="Arial">The new-look Tigertailz put out a brand new 3 track EP (King Of The World), and Pretty Boy Floyd released Size Really Does Matter. Granted, we didn't see them till very late in the year. Maybe you've not got it in the USA yet, but then I didn't get Robin Black till 2003, a little later than you.