Originally Posted by
catfightlover40
I won't quote a whole reply as it would be too long, nonetheless... I need to start at the confirmation bias. The part about which one is the most common form of titfighting, despite lack of sample size and a use of a control group. It's undeniably a form of a fight, except that's already only confirms an action by two willing participants going against learned behavior (unless they're on the non-heterosexual spectrum). It's quite superfluous to ask/demand further information on a subject that is well known, like the persecution of anything beyond vanilla sex. The historiography is heteronormative, and through their lens, titfighting is a non-heterosexual act, therefore to be pursued as sodomy. I've claimed that there's plenty of lost knowledge as the ones who could elaborate have been broken or murdered.
What isn't suppressed however is the extensive research on the effects of indoctrination of social/gender roles and female instinctive behavior. One among them is the mentioned use of secondary sexual characteristics to attract mates, in which they're selective. As our gestation period is longer than most animals and we're more adaptive to our surroundings, "mating season" is all year round, especially in light of the fact, that before the eradication of diseases killing mothers giving birth and young children before school age, women were expected to die young fulfilling a "sacred duty". "Dipping in the honey" became a priority as early as their 12th year, a "proud practice" still performed in half of America, it's a freedom of faith thing, kids' rights be damned. So on one level there's the instinctive behavior of turning away from those they don't wish to mate with, on the other the word of mouth homophobia. Whereas we men punish non-hetero normative behavior with extinction, women ostracize even on as little as a rumor or suspicion.
It's very well sourced that once Christianity came into power, they have started an all out war on every value not originating from them, including things we take now for granted, like personal hygiene. The process of learning one's own body (a practice we know of existing in ancient Greece through surviving fragments) via sexually experiencing with one's own gender was also one of them. For two women who aren't inebriated (like Natalie Portman and Mila Kunis in Black Swan, to perform a kissing scene which should come natural to an actor) the competition of strictly fat and tissue is everything they were taught not to do. To start with the obvious, what's pleasurable for us, can easily be just painful for them, if not worse. One of the largest drawbacks of having large breasts is that they can't be entirely scanned for tumors, so one false move can lead to a slow death. The second thing is the fear of challenging the core of one's self, fighting someone without being attracted to them (unless, again, they're elsewhere on the Kinsey Scale).
Bookmarks