dudley....

one word...Inbreeders....{ala son inlaw} I feel your pain Shatzy, not only is this dickhead a utter moron who beats on females, he hunts..Dont get me started.. [img]mad.gif[/img]

Well, from the lil bit read, won't say Dudley's someone who SHOULDN'T be taken-out (or "Capped", or "Snuffed", or whatever you say for killing someone), but I take offense at the "Inbreeder" jab. Just look at any purebreed dog-show or horse-breeder, they'd ALL get pissed at your "incest" INSINUATION. THAT really is ignorant. Do you know the first thing about genetics? If so, you would know that incest isn't really "bad" for the gene pool, but a positive occurance.

Incest, causes retardation after a while.
if YOU knew anything about genetics, they take careful thought into the selection of dogs, horses, and such that they breed to be thoroughbreds. Making sure a lot of the time, that incest does NOT occur, because more times than not, it may not be the first generation, or the second, but usually 3rd, etc... will show signs of mental retardation, as well as physical characteristics that leave a lot to be desired.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Tempus Sans ITC, Tahoma">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#000000"><font size=2 face="Tempus Sans ITC, Tahoma">Originally posted by HannyGood:
Incest, causes retardation after a while.
if YOU knew anything about genetics, they take careful thought into the selection of dogs, horses, and such that they breed to be thoroughbreds. Making sure a lot of the time, that incest does NOT occur, because more times than not, it may not be the first generation, or the second, but usually 3rd, etc... will show signs of mental retardation, as well as physical characteristics that leave a lot to be desired.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

He's telling the truth about the dogs. However, retardation CAN (not always) happen after just a first generation...

Ok, first of all, Yes I do know a little something about genetics. I happen to know that the limited gene-pool caused by continued inbreeding means that deleterious genes become widespread and the breed loses vigour. I also know that Incest is something totally different than what I am refering to, being a sex crime and all. I am simply stating that a dipshit such as Dudley, could very well be the product of inbreeding, being a dumb fuck redneck with no brain and all, capish?


Edit~
And further more, ANYONE who thinks that inbreeding is a positive occurance holds all the ignorance cards on this board. If YOU had any knowledge about that which you speak, you would know that ANIMAL breeders as well as HUMANS take care {if they are smart} NOT to inbreed. Inbreeding in say, dogs for instance, causes behavioral problems as well as retardation, and other physical 'screw ups.' So, the next time you wish to insult somebodys intelligence, you should be aware of that which you speak.

<font color="#ac0000" size="1">[ March 11, 2003 05:54 PM: Message edited by: PoisonIvyrowr ]</font>

I happen to know that the limited gene-pool caused by continued inbreeding means that deleterious genes become widespread and the breed loses vigour.
*************

That's very true. Genetics is my 'speciality' cos that's what I study and the science here is very simple. We need variety in order to prevent defected genes from becoming dominant. In case of inbreeding, there's no variety.

I'm now frustrated cos I can't express myself properly on this topic in English.

Thank you. [img]tongue.gif[/img]

*raises hand to offer alternate argument*

as the above may be true, it is also those
'alternate' genes that, in some cases, help to
improve upon a species.

there are many cases in which a limited gene pool
is exactly what is needed in order to breed a
certain 'effect'.

my first two hamsters bred (one grey/white, one
brown/white). from the offspring of that
mating came a solid grey-brown and a brown/white
which mated and produced 3 (out of 7) solid white
(non albino) hamster babies.

the death of that last batch was completely due
to 'mismanagement' on my part. however, if i were
to choose to breed again in order to produce
the same solid white hamster offspring, i would
still only limit my selection based upon the
limited pool.

i have always felt the cry of 'criminality within
incest' was merely folklore...
simply because i do not believe it holds much
weight in legitimate bearings in as far as
'ganked' offspring.

i guess i hold an imperfect deck, PI...
but i shall completely disregard the 'retards
from incest' cliche.

I think I will agree to disagree here Shatzy..But anyways, man I was aaaall GRRR in my post up there..hehe.

lol... fair enough. [img]tongue.gif[/img]