Can it be?

[soulfilms]

THANK YOU! THANKYOU! of course, i always knew i was a genius, now everyone else is starting to see it too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[soulfilms]

and SO modest!

[SHATOUSHKA]

boy! you ARE modest!

thats so unlike you, SF!

[Hannibal]

Modesty, how becoming...

[zelazny]

If nothings wrong, everythings wrong.
If everythings wrong, nothings right.

If nothings right, then the first statement is wrong.

let's see.... eeehm..
lets say that A denotates all.
and that x means wrong, and y means right
and let ! mean not, then
x <> !y
(wrong is not right, and vice versa)
converting your phrases to logic would imply that
!Ax <> Ax ( you said wrong twice)
(If nothings wrong, everythings wrong.)
and
Ax <> !A y
(If everythings wrong, nothings right.)

do you see how your system falls apart at the first statement?
you claim that not being wrong means that it is wrong, and vice versa. which is an inconsistent preposition
(allthough i might have completely messed my logic up, it's been years)

[SHATOUSHKA]

waaaaaaaaaaay ahead of ya, zela

[zelazny]

yeah, but i couldn't help showing off [img]wink.gif[/img]