It depends if the method of language has rules to permit contradictions, or not. For example, we speak english, aristotle didn't. Perhaps if he did, I could tell him, "I'm going to stay here."
aristotle used three ways to show the law of non-contradiction:
1. ontologically-a thing cannot have two opposing attributes at the same time (this does not refer to relational characteristics, such as tall or heavy)
2. linguistically-to say two contrary things in a sentence is really saying nothing at all
3. psychologically-a person cannot believe two contrary things at the same time about the same thing
if #2 and #3 are true, does that mean that #1 is also?
It depends if the method of language has rules to permit contradictions, or not. For example, we speak english, aristotle didn't. Perhaps if he did, I could tell him, "I'm going to stay here."
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Just wondering : belief is not bound by logic.Originally posted by why are all the good names taken?:
3. psychologically-a person cannot believe two contrary things at the same time about the same thing
And besides, who remembers double-think?
Heck, remember that dead/living cat in the box-example they use for quantum physics?
<font color="#6699ff" size="1">[ July 23, 2003 01:37 AM: Message edited by: zelazny ]</font>
Bookmarks