-
August 26th, 2004, 11:16 AM
#31
Inactive Member
lol, there's not a whole lot of blood anyways [img]tongue.gif[/img] . These are animals that ide dlong ago.
-
August 26th, 2004, 11:55 AM
#32
Senior Hostboard Member
Well, I still can't stand it, okay? [img]graemlins/gulp.gif[/img]
-
August 26th, 2004, 12:31 PM
#33
HB Forum Owner
IRT Cav: supposedly they only use roadkill and animals already euthanized by the pounds for this stuff
I doubt it. Seriously, especially for frogs etc. And what's with "euthanizing"? That's a modern pound euphemism for murdering animals because you don't want to spend $4 a day on taking care of them. Pounds should never kill ? euthanasia is for when they are suffering from illness, and all life has remaining for them is suffering.
Bah, there has been only one leader that really cared for animals ? and that was Hitler. The world sucks.
-
August 26th, 2004, 12:39 PM
#34
Senior Hostboard Member
That's the point Wiseman... The World Sucks...
-
August 26th, 2004, 02:49 PM
#35
HB Forum Owner
Well, actually, the world is wonderful, it's humanity what sucks. That's one of the reasons why I defend animals so much ? they have done so little, yet received so much, from their more intelligent, yet more stupid and brutal big brothers.
Also quoting Nietzsche: ?The Christian resolution to find the world ugly and bad has made the world ugly and bad.?
-
August 26th, 2004, 06:17 PM
#36
Inactive Member
Most people don't want animals to be killed but not all of can live. It's unrealistic for animal shelters/pounds to keep every animal alive. New ones are brought in while few are adopted. If I got a dog I'd probably get one at the pet store since they're still young. Meh as for a cat I'd get it at Petsmart, their cats are from shelters anyways.
-
August 26th, 2004, 08:33 PM
#37
HB Forum Owner
You can still find young dogs in pounds, and pounds wouldn't need to kill animals if they had the proper budget, as it's already being tested in some cities.
The most effective system to reduce abandoned animals is the mandatory installation of a microchip that serves as the animal's ID. If you want to have a dog or a cat in Madrid, you have to register him/her (otherwise it'd be illegal), by which he/she gets a microchip installed. All abandoned animals are checked for their IDs, and if the owner hadn't filled a missing pet form, he/she will be fined (sadly not jailed, but should get so). This way people thinks twice before abandoning a registered animal, and there are means to ensure all domestic cats and dogs are registered. Of course the harsher the punishments for animal cruelty and abandonment, the better, 2 years of jail would be fine to dissuade potential abandoners.
Pounds should also focus on dogs since cats can survive in the streets (there's always somebody who feds them, I currently feed 4 cats), and there are private pounds that help with taking care of abandoned animals. My family helps two of them whose policy is to never kill; when they are full, they wait until one dies of old age, or they have enough funds to expand.
-
August 27th, 2004, 03:03 AM
#38
Senior Hostboard Member
Really true, but there are still good ppl...
-
August 27th, 2004, 06:58 AM
#39
Senior Hostboard Member
All so very true, but if they punish ppl, they won't take the risk of having animals...
-
August 27th, 2004, 11:26 AM
#40
HB Forum Owner
That's exactly what I want: people who don't want to get an animal because they may have to abandon him/her in 1-2 years better never get one. Only people willing to take care of him/her for life should.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks