<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Exactly. An 8-2 season where the 2 losses were both lop-sided affairs does not warrant "improvements" to the schedule. Until Hurley can compete with Haysi and Honaker regularly, there schedule needs to remain as soft as it is. Next year, Hurley will have to replace Big Creek. I have no idea who they will have to find in there place (possibly Grundy; didn't they just sign for 1 year with Haysi?), but I expect it to be a tough game to fill.Originally posted by Dunduin:
I disagree, I think Hurley's program will benefit from this weak scheduling by getting more people interested in playing. <font color="#a62a2a"><font size="1">[ November 07, 2005 12:41 PM: Message edited by: Dunduin ]</font></font>
Of course, I think there are some games Hurley should drop anyhow, such as Thomas Walker (worthless trip, worthless game) and Tug Valley (just no simple way to get there).
Bookmarks