-
December 31st, 2004, 10:56 PM
#21
Inactive Member
-
January 2nd, 2005, 02:36 AM
#22
Inactive Member
-
January 2nd, 2005, 03:36 AM
#23
Inactive Member
-
January 4th, 2005, 07:38 AM
#24
Inactive Member
agree.
sandman89/thwipp89
chicagho search & destroyers
<font color="#000002" size="1">[ February 15, 2005 07:32 PM: Message edited by: sandman89 ]</font>
-
January 4th, 2005, 07:50 PM
#25
Inactive Member
-
January 5th, 2005, 01:49 PM
#26
Inactive Member
Agree, but I too don't understand why trading creates a release exemption -- if you take on a contract, you take on a contract! Who ever suggested otherwise?
I think it also needs to be emphasised that if you put a guy with a contract greater than 0 years on the DL, and sign somebody to replace his salary, if you sign that replacement for any longer than 0 years you will not be able to adhere to the rules once your original player is healthy and must be either reactivated or released, unless you have equivalent salary worth of 0 year (ie droppable) guys. Everybody needs to be very careful of this, because it can create a situation where owners are forced to break one rule or another. How would we handle that?
-
January 5th, 2005, 10:59 PM
#27
Inactive Member
-
January 7th, 2005, 04:47 AM
#28
Inactive Member
i agree, but when you look at the league info page within league #40 it says the playoff length is 5 game series.... is it 5 or 7 games?
-
January 29th, 2005, 06:52 PM
#29
Inactive Member
-
February 7th, 2005, 06:05 AM
#30
Inactive Member
Agree. Concerning Contracts does this mean the players that I am saddled with at the beginning before the draft I have to keep for at least a year.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks