-
June 22nd, 2005, 04:00 PM
#1
Inactive Member
Proposed: We drop our guaranteed contract rule and use the new Simgal rule.
For my part, I like our current rule better, but I'm growing increasingly frustrated at how difficult it is to get everyone on the same page and doing what they're supposed to do. The new rule does most of what I want with guaranteed contracts and eliminates the need to watch over everyone and make sure all the players end up on teams where they're supposed to.
-
June 22nd, 2005, 08:52 PM
#2
Inactive Member
i think it'd be much easier/simpler to just adopt the new change. it's only 1 more year and we won't have to worry about accidental releases or policing everyone. less headaches and basically the same policy. it seems like a win-win in my book.
-
June 22nd, 2005, 11:36 PM
#3
Inactive Member
I've suggested something which, if Scott implements it, should make tracking illegal releases so much easier: http://www.hostboard.com/cgi-bin/ult...=1930&t=2017#8
-
June 22nd, 2005, 11:59 PM
#4
Inactive Member
Go with the new rules Scott will be putting in.....its a positive.
-
June 23rd, 2005, 01:27 AM
#5
Inactive Member
I would prefer to keep the existing rules -- every other league will move to the new ones, and the main thing I love about this league is that it's like a different game, keeping it interesting. If you can drop one-year guys, then you return to the days of signing free agents to one-year deals just in case they have good gaps, and then dropping them if not.
-
June 23rd, 2005, 01:42 AM
#6
Inactive Member
Let's go with the new rules that Scott is putting in place. We still have the draft that is different (yes it is growing on me). We may not always have a TC that is willing to do what he has been doing.
-
June 23rd, 2005, 02:27 AM
#7
Inactive Member
If Scott changes the release notification news item to show the contract terms, we won't need TC to do anything.
-
June 23rd, 2005, 06:44 AM
#8
Inactive Member
I think we should go to the new way, it will be much easier.
-
June 23rd, 2005, 01:48 PM
#9
Inactive Member
I would like us to stay with what our current rules are - it is not that difficult.
-
June 23rd, 2005, 03:30 PM
#10
Inactive Member
In a rather alarming turn of events I am in complete agreement with stumps [img]eek.gif[/img] . I love the way the contract situation is working now. And if it is possible for Scott to make the changes that stumpy suggested monitoring the system would become much easier.
dicky
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks