Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Guaranteed Contracts Discussion

  1. #1
    Inactive Member TuringComplete's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 17th, 2004
    Posts
    246
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Proposed: We drop our guaranteed contract rule and use the new Simgal rule.

    For my part, I like our current rule better, but I'm growing increasingly frustrated at how difficult it is to get everyone on the same page and doing what they're supposed to do. The new rule does most of what I want with guaranteed contracts and eliminates the need to watch over everyone and make sure all the players end up on teams where they're supposed to.

  2. #2
    Inactive Member sandman89's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 23rd, 2003
    Posts
    97
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    i think it'd be much easier/simpler to just adopt the new change. it's only 1 more year and we won't have to worry about accidental releases or policing everyone. less headaches and basically the same policy. it seems like a win-win in my book.

  3. #3
    Inactive Member Stumps's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 28th, 2002
    Posts
    132
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I've suggested something which, if Scott implements it, should make tracking illegal releases so much easier: http://www.hostboard.com/cgi-bin/ult...=1930&t=2017#8

  4. #4
    Inactive Member DS's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 5th, 2004
    Posts
    107
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Go with the new rules Scott will be putting in.....its a positive.

  5. #5
    Inactive Member Stumps's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 28th, 2002
    Posts
    132
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I would prefer to keep the existing rules -- every other league will move to the new ones, and the main thing I love about this league is that it's like a different game, keeping it interesting. If you can drop one-year guys, then you return to the days of signing free agents to one-year deals just in case they have good gaps, and then dropping them if not.

  6. #6
    Inactive Member Phil D's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 27th, 2004
    Posts
    83
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Let's go with the new rules that Scott is putting in place. We still have the draft that is different (yes it is growing on me). We may not always have a TC that is willing to do what he has been doing.

  7. #7
    Inactive Member Stumps's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 28th, 2002
    Posts
    132
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    If Scott changes the release notification news item to show the contract terms, we won't need TC to do anything.

  8. #8
    Inactive Member kidpreacher's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 11th, 2002
    Posts
    44
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I think we should go to the new way, it will be much easier.

  9. #9
    Inactive Member hornetjohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 30th, 2002
    Posts
    169
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I would like us to stay with what our current rules are - it is not that difficult.

  10. #10
    Inactive Member dicky_knee's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 18th, 2002
    Posts
    59
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    In a rather alarming turn of events I am in complete agreement with stumps [img]eek.gif[/img] . I love the way the contract situation is working now. And if it is possible for Scott to make the changes that stumpy suggested monitoring the system would become much easier.

    dicky

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •