Looking at these pics, it seems to me it will be another statue?
http://photos.figures.com/photo/1/sh...25307&cat=2939
Printable View
Looking at these pics, it seems to me it will be another statue?
http://photos.figures.com/photo/1/sh...25307&cat=2939
I hope not...
Those are the 2ups - I dont think they articulate those... (I hope)
Mandy 1 practically was, I dont see why this one wouldn't be... but, it's fixable [img]graemlins/devil.gif[/img]
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I think they do. And that fig doesn't look like it's got much articulation. Damn. This was one I was hoping DID have joints. They could have been hidden easily. [img]frown.gif[/img]Quote:
Originally posted by Drau:
Those are the 2ups - I dont think they articulate those... (I hope)
Yeah, McF always articulates their 2-ups. Hence the reason the sculpts look so similar from proto to production.
actually it looks like it has some articulation to me. the knees for sure. especially since the proto pics have been crouched and the teaser image had it standing straight up
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">The standing photo also could have been early in the design stage. Things do have a way of changing....or it might just be the angle it was taken at.Quote:
Originally posted by S-Mart Manager:
actually it looks like it has some articulation to me. the knees for sure. especially since the proto pics have been crouched and the teaser image had it standing straight up
Im still pretty dead set on it being the angle for that.... it (the sihlouette) was a sideways (profile, sort of?) shot, if the legs are basically in the same linear... line... thingie [img]eek.gif[/img] then it'll looks just like he's standing up... it also means it could be a wobbly figure.... [img]confused.gif[/img]
personally on this figure I wouldnt mind if there is no articulation. I have all the other versions side by side in one position and this will just stand next to them