Re: Horn mouth termination
I'll try to post a pic tonight....I used some felt fabric that I rolled up
and used...he he...some paper clips to hold it in place just to listen.
I need to repeat the test because my hearing was already used up
yesterday but I thought it deadened the sparkle and lowered the horn sound.
Maybe the key is to use as little as possible and maybe that's why I see it used
so sparingly in the applications that are out there. Obviously this is fairly
obscure territory to be wading in...
Re: Horn mouth termination
For more info you might do a search on 'HOM' 'Higher Order Modes' (IIRC). May be the same thing.
I believe it'd get you into a discussion of 'mouth reflections' and the signals bouncing around the horn, arriving out of time with the original.
Topics RE the UREI 604 monitors (?) with the foam CD horn might also apply.
Re: Horn mouth termination
Quote:
Originally Posted by
gearfreak
For more info you might do a search on 'HOM' 'Higher Order Modes' (IIRC). May be the same thing.
I believe it'd get you into a discussion of 'mouth reflections' and the signals bouncing around the horn, arriving out of time with the original.
Topics RE the UREI 604 monitors (?) with the foam CD horn might also apply.
HOMs are reflections inside the horn that comb filter with the direct radiation not unlike what happens when speakers generate early reflections off the room's various boundaries. Mouth generated reflections are both spurious (HOMs 'ringing' off the lips such as bell modes) and eigenmodes (standing waves) across it that cause reflections back to the throat (or at least the first fold), modulating it.
Dr.Geddes's foam insert quells the HOMs and the Tractrix, Jean-Michel Le Cl?ac'h terminations as well as Peavey's foam 'lip' or similar do a good job of dealing with the eigenmodes.
GM
Re: Horn mouth termination
HOMs are a bit different and relate more to reflections generated in the throat of horn.
You should not lose sparkle with the soft lips, but you will hear the loss of something. That something is generally a kink in the midrange. Response should be flatter - and better of axis too - with the edge treament.
As long as you are not blocking the sound path and you hear less of something, that's probably a good thing. =) Live with it a bit to see what you think.
EDIT: OH, GM posted before me. He says it well.
Re: Horn mouth termination
Rather than trying to fix some kind of damping 'thing' around the horn mouth, would adhering a thin acoustically absorbent material like felt or suede even, to the last few inches of the actual horn surface give the desired result?
I've tried to illustrate what I mean in the attached image.
Re: Horn mouth termination
I see what you mean and it's certainly a more elegant approach...
However it may not do enough. Easy enough to test. Just try a couple of big towels to start (2 per horn). Then judge your own improvements by that standard.
Re: Horn mouth termination
http://www.superbadcat.com/images/stereo/511e_7.jpg
I think the horn sound is diminished...anyway something has
changed considerably to cause what I'm hearing. Talk about a low
cost tweak...just how d'ya get it done "best"?
i think the bells should be sculpted to have a curve not so abrupt.
I really think I should do that first and then experiment with the material lining.
Very interesting!
Re: Horn mouth termination
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Steve Mac
...just how d'ya get it done "best"?...
To use one of Bad Bob's favorite words...
"empirically, of course"
tweak, measure, tweak, measure, rinse, repeat. Last verse same as the first. :D
Re: Horn mouth termination
If it works on 511/811's, will it do the same on the horn section of a 828 cabinet? or is the wave length too long?