GOP blocks legislation to award seniors $250...

WASHINGTON ? House and Senate Republicans on Wednesday thwarted Democratic efforts to award $250 checks to Social Security recipients facing a second consecutive year without a cost-of-living increase.

President Barack Obama and Democrats have urged approval of the one-time payment, saying seniors barely getting by on their Social Security checks face undue hardships without the COLA increase.

But most Republicans contended that the nation couldn't afford the estimated $14 billion cost of the payment, and that the COLA freezes in 2010 and 2011 come after seniors received a significant boost in 2009.

The measure was brought up under a fast-track procedure in the House that required a two-thirds majority for passage. The 254-153 vote in favor of the bill fell short of that.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the financial aid was critical to seniors facing rising costs and falling home values and was fiscally responsible. "But unfortunately," she said, "congressional Republicans overwhelmingly chose to oppose it."

Twenty-six Republicans voted for the bill, while 141 opposed it. Democrats were in favor, 228-12.

Later, the Senate voted 53-45 on a measure to bring the Social Security supplement bill to the Senate floor for debate. That was seven short of the 60 votes needed to advance the legislation.

COLAs are set automatically each year by an inflation measure that was adopted by Congress in 1975. More than 58 million retirees, disabled people and surviving family members receive Social Security or Supplemental Security Income checks. The average monthly check is $1,072.

The increase for 2009 was 5.8 percent, the largest in 27 years. It was triggered by a sharp but short-lived spike in gas prices to above $4 a gallon in the summer of 2008. By law, the next increase in benefits won't come until consumer prices as a whole rise above what they were that summer.

Democrats and advocacy groups say the formula does not accurately reflect the living costs of seniors, who pay more for such commodities as health care and drugs.

"Basically, they have their benefit levels flatlined at a time when they're encountering higher costs, reducing their quality of life experience and disappointing them greatly about Social Security," said Rep. Earl Pomeroy, D-N.D., a member of the Ways and Means Social Security subcommittee.

Rep. Sam Johnson of Texas, the top Republican on that subcommittee, acknowledged that disappointment but noted the big increase seniors received in 2009 and the fact that a COLA increase means there will be no rise in Medicare Part B costs for doctors' visits. "Increasing our nation's crushing deficit on the backs of our children by an additional $14 billion is wrong," he said.

Barbara Kennelly, president of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, said it was a "cruel irony" that while Congress and White House were negotiating a deal extending huge tax cuts to wealthy Americans, "today we're told that providing $250 for America's seniors and their families is considered too generous."

The House did approve, by voice vote, a Senate-passed bill aimed at stopping Social Security number fraud by barring federal, state and local governments from displaying those numbers on paper checks.

The bill also bans federal, state and local governments from using prisoners in any capacity that would give them access to Social Security numbers.

GOP blocks legislation to award seniors $250 - Yahoo! News

and WTF is 250 dollars going to do anyway? another hand out we cant afford anyway. we DONT need more debt. 250 dollars per person wont help that ONE person, but billions of dollars to our debt screws us all.

Uh they didn't get a COL raise, I'd say they could use it, go ahead and tell that to the senior citizens like my grandmother who barely makes it by...she could sure use that extra check. Wow.

Sadly though no one is getting a COL raise at this point in time. I have taken a pay cut in the past year and half due to the economy, so that we didn't have to lay anyone off. Its part of the times unfortunately. Im sure about everyone could use an extra $250.

Difference is that you got an $800 credit at least this past year and will this coming year, these seniors didn't get that, and won't benefit from the payroll tax cut either.

My pay cut was much more than what that is worth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rocky

and WTF is 250 dollars going to do anyway? another hand out we cant afford anyway. we DONT need more debt. 250 dollars per person wont help that ONE person, but billions of dollars to our debt screws us all.

---

So we should "keep up the good work" by keeping tax cuts and let the fixed income group go?:D If some of the group that governs this had to try to get by on what seniors do, they would starve in a couple weeks. This is bullshit, plain and simple. We have several areas that can stand cuts better than this group. I can't tell that prices haven't gone up in the last couple of years, seems as if things still have gone up in price. However, if the SS group don't swing enough votes- who cares, right? And if 250 a person won't help them, it shouldn't be enough to hurt the rest- correct?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 1inStripes

My pay cut was much more than what that is worth.

---

1800 at least should go along way coming up this year though, while they would be getting nothing.

Its nice no doubt. Puts me at about -$2200 or so though counting my pay cut.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by simple man

So we should "keep up the good work" by keeping tax cuts and let the fixed income group go?:D If some of the group that governs this had to try to get by on what seniors do, they would starve in a couple weeks. This is bullshit, plain and simple. We have several areas that can stand cuts better than this group. I can't tell that prices haven't gone up in the last couple of years, seems as if things still have gone up in price. However, if the SS group don't swing enough votes- who cares, right? And if 250 a person won't help them, it shouldn't be enough to hurt the rest- correct?

---

no, what we need to do is get the deadbeats that are getting benefits that dont need it off of the system so that the seniors who are suffering can get the money they deserve from it. how is a ONE time payment going to help? we saw that it wouldnt do anything good from the one time payment/tax breaks we got.