I've heard the commercials about the 260 hp V6. Just wondering if all that horsepower is getting lost in an automatic transmission. Has anyone been out for a test ride or seen any reviews?
Printable View
I've heard the commercials about the 260 hp V6. Just wondering if all that horsepower is getting lost in an automatic transmission. Has anyone been out for a test ride or seen any reviews?
people who have ridden say it feels faster than a stock gsr, heck shawn church timed one with a stop watch 0-60 6 flat. granted that won't be "exact" still pretty quick for an auto even if it's a 5speed auto. i haven't personally been for ride but i entered in car test and it ran a 14.8 so i'm sure it would be a mid to high 14 sec car
------------------
Sam
http://homepages.go.com/~acuraintegr...ntegraman.html
Something to remember about any car. TORQUE makes most feel faster than a GS-R. A GS-R doesn't pull hard, it just pulls long. So most cars, even my mini van feels stronger than a stock GS-R, but it's that flat torque curve and lower gears that gives the GS-R the advantage at the track.
For a cruise'n, reasonably quick sedan, you bet, the CL 3.2 is really nice. (then you put a blower on it!)
Me and my dad test drove a new 3.2 Cl S and let me say that it is one hell of a car. It is very quick and the ergonomics are great. I think the sequential sporshift helps out with the tranny. The dual exaust also make it look vary bad-ass.
why dont we just admit its faster than a GS-R
http://www.hostboard.com/ubb/biggrin.gif