God is certainly unimaginable, but can be experienced by anyone.
The special knowledge has two components, one is knowledge and
other is unimaginable nature of God
God is certainly unimaginable, ? but God can be experienced by anyone.
When you experience unimaginable ? nature, God is experienced.
Experience does not mean that you - have understood unimaginable God.
When you say that the solution of ? a problem is unimaginable to you,
Does it not mean that you have ? experienced it as unimaginable item?
The characteristic of God is ? unimaginable nature, it is experienced,
It means unimaginable God is ? experienced, experience does not
Contradict unimaginable nature, - after all, you can say that something is
Unimaginable when you experience that ? it is unimaginable to you.
Knowledge is constantly associated ? characteristic of God for identity,
But knowledge exists in scholar also, - God is isolated from scholar by
The specialty of knowledge of God ? that cannot be seen anywhere.
This specialty of knowledge comes ? from unimaginable nature of God.
The unimaginable nature of God ? is mixed with the knowledge and
The knowledge becomes special ? or unimaginable or wonderful.
The special knowledge has - two components, one is knowledge and
The other is unimaginable nature of God, - both are experienced items.
Knowledge is quality or Sattvam, - it is imaginable and experienced.
Such knowledge mixed with unimaginable ? nature of God becomes
Unimaginable knowledge and both are ? items of experience only.
Knowledge remains imaginable, - but the unimaginable nature
Makes it wonderful and this is ? called as Prajnanam by Veda.
The point in His knowledge is ? clear and imaginable to you.
But you have not heard that point ? anywhere in the world before.
Hence the point is imaginable by virtue ? of its knowledge component.
By virtue of the unimaginable component ? it is unheard anywhere.
You have not imagined that point ? so far and this is unimaginable.
This does not mean that the point ? itself is unimaginable to you.
For example you have read - Ramayana and Bhagavatam before,
You know that Gopikas worshipped ? Krishna and Hanuman worshipped
Rama, now you start worshipping ? Rama and Krishna as statues.
But the point there is that Gopikas ? did not worship statue of Rama,
Hanuman did not worship statue ? of Vamana, past human incarnation.
It means that you have to worship ? your contemporary human incarnation.
This point is understood now by you, - it is very simple to understand.
But you have not imagined this point ? so far, so it was unimaginable.
Both components are experienced, - no objection of experience to
The unimaginable component - as said above, hence total Prajnanam
Being experienced by you results ? in the experience of God, speaking
Prajnanam through your contemporary ? human incarnation, the Satguru.
