Printable View
The debate rages on...
Astronomers propose keeping Pluto in the club ? and adding 3 more
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/msnbc/Co..._2p.hlarge.jpg
<font size="1">This lineup shows the 12 proposed planets, with a wedge of the sun at far left. Ceres, Pluto, Charon and 2003 UB313 are barely visible. The planets are drawn to scale, but without correct relative distances.</font>
eh, who cares. if theres nothing alive on them who gives a crap if they are called planets, moons or motorcycles
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Well, Duck Dodgers for one. [img]wink.gif[/img]Quote:
Originally posted by Mr. Yac:
eh, who cares. if theres nothing alive on them who gives a crap if they are called planets, moons or motorcycles
Scientists are bitching about this... of all other more important things?
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">maybe, but we have another 23 1/2 centuries before he'll be around to complain about itQuote:
Originally posted by Andyman:
Well, Duck Dodgers for one. [img]wink.gif[/img]
[img]tongue.gif[/img]
Isn't Ceres that big-ass asteroid...? [img]graemlins/hmmm.gif[/img]
Hehe....Uranus [img]tongue.gif[/img]
Well, it's important if you are giving interstellar directions...
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">maybe, but we have another 23 1/2 centuries before he'll be around to complain about itQuote:
Originally posted by Mr. Yac:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Andyman:
Well, Duck Dodgers for one. [img]wink.gif[/img]
[img]tongue.gif[/img] </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Huh? Duck Dodgers is from the 44th 1/2 century? I think not.
damn my bad math, well you get the idea [img]tongue.gif[/img]