My view about the Moderators here

I've reached a point where I feel the need to express my disappointment with the mods. I urge you to read the text that follows carefully, keeping an open mind, from the beginning to the end, and without skipping around. I further recommend that you take breaks, as many of the facts presented will take time to digest. You might not care that the nicest thing that can be said about the mods's adulators is that they are wicked, dirty suborners of perjury out to arouse inter-ethnic suspicion, but you'd better start caring if you don't want the mods to peddle the snake oil of surly onanism. The mods are living in a dream world. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it unquestionably expresses how the extremism "debate" is not a debate. It is a harangue, a politically motivated, brilliantly publicized, mindless attack on progressive ideas. Even if scummy control freaks join the mods's band with the best of intentions, they will still destroy all tradition, all morality, and the entire democratic system quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "thyroparathyroidectomize". Not all, I hasten to add, do join with the best of intentions.

The cliches of the mods's half-measures are well-known to us all. I kid you not. Individually, the mods's slurs impose hostile new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of venal drive for power. But linked together, the mods's ideals could easily permit dictatorial, hidebound freebooters to rise to positions of leadership and authority. Of course, the mods is the embodiment of everything petty in our lives. Every grievance, every envy, every slimy, iconoclastic ideology finds expression in the mods. When you reflect upon this, you'll realize that the mods's faithfuls think that the mods's activities are on the up-and-up. I say to them, "Prove it" -- not that they'll be able to, of course, but because even if one is opposed to libidinous hedonism (and I am), then surely, the mods say it's going to suck up to raving, cacodemonic stool pigeons before you know it. Good old the mods. They just love to open their mouths and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how vapid they sound. Summa summarum, the mods's expositions are steeped in insensitive irrationalism.

Thanks to Yig and
<a href="http://www.pakin.org/complaint/" target="_blank">
Complaint</a>

[img]tongue.gif[/img]

<font color="#cd6600" size="1">[ May 31, 2005 10:13 PM: Message edited by: sculpey ]</font>

<u>To those that complain about mods:</u>

There are people I unmistakably despise. They lack morals, character, and honesty. They clear forests, strip the topsoil, and turn a natural paradise into a dust bowl through a self-induced drought. In case you can't tell, I'm talking about those that complain about mods here. Let me begin by saying that there is a format those that complain about mods should follow for its next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts. Those that complain about mods's tirades are a veritable dictionary and synonymicon of masochism. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life.

Those that complain about mods argues that laws are meant to be broken. To maintain this thesis, those that complain about mods naturally has had to shovel away a mountain of evidence, which it does by the desperate expedient of claiming that it has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring itself to help disseminate the True Faith of elitism. I hope that those that complain about mods's proposed social programs were intended as a joke, although they're not very funny if they were. Still, we shouldn't jump to conclusions, even though it is a known fact that I should note that those that complain about mods's scribblings reek of Maoism. I use the word "reek", because griping about those that complain about mods will not make it stop trying to fix blame for social stress, economic loss, or loss of political power on a target group whose constructed guilt provides a simplistic explanation. But even if it did, it would just find some other way to judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of their character. Even if I agreed that those that complain about mods's impudent, huffy treatises were of paramount importance, it would still be the case that the original purpose of colonialism was to control, manipulate, and harm other people. And I can say that with a clear conscience, because if you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will sincerely find that if you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem.

More concretely, if those that complain about mods wants to be taken seriously, it should counter the arguments in this letter with facts, not illogical panaceas, personal anecdotes, or insults. Even giving those that complain about mods the benefit of the doubt, it has a strategy. Its strategy is to discourage us from expressing our rodomontades in whatever way we damn well please. Wherever you encounter that strategy, you are dealing with those that complain about mods. Do not let inflammatory rhetoric and misleading and inaccurate statements decide your position on this issue. Those that complain about mods's mudslinging reports defy the rules of logic. News of this deviousness must spread like wildfire if we are ever to debate the efficacy of its salacious, gutless off-the-cuff comments.

Those that complain about mods's trained seals portray themselves as fervent believers in freedom of speech and expression, but are loath to reveal that those that complain about mods's epithets manifest themselves in two phases. Phase one: twist my words six ways for Sunday. Phase two: turn the social order upside-down so that the dregs on the bottom become the scum on the top. Let me give you an important hint: When trying to understand what those that complain about mods is up to, look at what it is doing and what it has done. Don't let yourself be distracted by the patter and the hand-waving; keep your eye on the shell that has the pea under it. And focus your mind on the fact that those that complain about mods's fatuitous smears leave the current power structure untouched while simultaneously killing countless children through starvation and disease. Are these children its enemies? Well, I'm sure those that complain about mods would rather take advantage of human fallibility to interfere with my efforts to deal with the relevant facts than answer that particular question.

One of those that complain about mods's shock troops once said, "We can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is." Now that's pretty funny, of course, but I didn't include that quote just to make you laugh. I included it to convince you that unlike those that complain about mods, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if -- and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of "innocent until proven guilty" -- it were not actually responsible for trying to pamper combative spouters, then I'd stop saying that the objection may still be raised that those that complain about mods is the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. At first glance, this sounds almost believable. Yet the following must be borne in mind: To say that those that complain about mods's witticisms can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality is cocky nonsense and untrue to boot. Those that complain about mods's ideologies leave me with several unanswered questions: Is it possible for those who defend contemptuous heathenism to make their defense look more unbridled than it currently is? And when it looks in the mirror in the morning, does those that complain about mods see more than the same, scurrilous, execrable face that all predaceous, prissy hoodlums share? These are difficult questions to answer, because those that complain about mods's hangers-on have learned their scripts well, and the rhetoric comes gushing forth with little provocation.

The most soulless traitors I've ever seen may possess a mass of "knowledge", but their brains are unable to organize and register the material they have taken in. I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because those that complain about mods's stances were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing for the "innocents". Rather, those that complain about mods argues that it could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: It is the embodiment of everything petty in our lives. Every grievance, every envy, every benighted ideology finds expression in those that complain about mods. Why am I furious? Because we must grant people the freedom to pursue any endeavor they deem fitting to their skills, talent, and interest. Only then can a society free of its morally repugnant circulars blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that once people obtain the critical skills that enable them to think and reflect and speculate independently, they'll realize that those that complain about mods believes that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive. That's just wrong. It further believes that things have never been better. Wrong again! And why am I embarrassed? Because the only weapons those that complain about mods has in its intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all it has, and it knows it.

Those that complain about mods says that it does the things it does "for the children". Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, "They're not in here!"?

Those that complain about mods has certainly never given evidence of thinking extensively. Or at all, for that matter. When a mistake is made, the smart thing to do is to admit it and reverse course. That takes real courage. The way that those that complain about mods stubbornly refuses to own up to its mistakes serves only to convince me that one can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. Those that complain about mods, however, is more likely to excoriate attempts to bring questions of sadism into the (essentially apolitical) realm of pedagogy in language and writing.

Is this anything other than fickle radicalism? The answer is obvious if you happen to notice that all the deals those that complain about mods makes are strictly one-way. Those that complain about mods gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. Those that complain about mods thinks it's good that its contrivances create a climate of intimidation. It is difficult to know how to respond to such monumentally misplaced values, but let's try this: No one likes being attacked by self-satisfied, raucous bourgeoisie. Even worse, those that complain about mods exploits our fear of those attacks -- which it claims will evolve by the next full moon into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks -- as a pretext to present a false image to the world by hiding unpleasant but vitally important realities about its propositions. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that those that complain about mods is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, its willingness to defile the air and water in the name of profit sets a new record for brazenness. Thanks to those that complain about mods, I'm now suffering from post-traumatic stress syndrome. So what's the connection between that and those that complain about mods's practices? The connection is that every time it gets caught trying to deliver an additional blow to dignity and self-worth, it promises it'll never do so again. Subsequently, its allies always jump in and explain that it really shouldn't be blamed even if it does, because, as they claim, space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us.

When I say that those that complain about mods's followers are suckers for rallying chants, regurgitated, standardized slogans, and other behavioral reinforcements, I consider this to mean that it's unfortunate that those that complain about mods has no real morals. It's impossible to debate important topics with organizations that are so ethically handicapped. It is never easy to judge what the most appropriate or effective response to those that complain about mods's jaded belief systems is, but one unfortunate fact remains clear: Those that complain about mods's victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of those that complain about mods's encomiasts, who loudly proclaim that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years. Regardless of those ridiculous proclamations, the truth is that it is immature and stupid of it to rewrite history to reflect or magnify an imaginary "victimhood". It would be mature and intelligent, however, to fight tooth and nail against it, and that's why I say that like a verbal magician, it knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. I'm sure you get my point here. Honest people will admit that those that complain about mods's latest "revelation" (really, hallucination) is that we're supposed to shut up and smile when it says grotesque, meretricious things. Concerned people are not afraid to present another paradigm in opposition to those that complain about mods's slaphappy, headstrong hijinks. And sensible people know that those that complain about mods seizes every opportunity to start wars, ruin the environment, invent diseases, and routinely do a hundred other things that kill people. I cannot believe this colossal clownishness. Any sane person knows that those that complain about mods asserts that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. That assertion is not only untrue, but a conscious lie. Although those that complain about mods is guilty of a shocking display of dishonesty and sophistry, we are here to gain our voice in this world, and whether or not those that complain about mods approves, we will continue to be heard.

you can get some great ones if you type in 'my penis'

"Mike Hunt" comes up with some crackers as well!

this thing ROCKS!


*bans sculpey* [img]wink.gif[/img]

<u>My complaint about Mods that try to ban mods</u>

I am writing this letter rather reluctantly. I do not wish to begin an incendiary debate about Mods that try to ban mods's taradiddles. However, Mods that try to ban mods has recently made a few statements that I find disturbing to such a degree that I cannot remain silent. You see, I doubtlessly believe that those of us whose minds are not narcotized still remember Mods that try to ban mods's frequent outbreaks of savagery. And because of that belief, I'm going to throw politeness and inoffensiveness to the winds. In this letter, I'm going to be as rude and crude as I know how, to reinforce the point that I, not being one of the many bestial, self-pitying swindlers of this world, want to unify our community. Mods that try to ban mods, in contrast, wants to drive divisive ideological wedges through it. It's quite easy for Mods that try to ban mods to bombastically declaim my proposals. But when is it going to provide an alternative proposal of its own? In classic sophist fashion, I ask another question in reply: Do reprehensible, rabid enemies of the people like its slaves actually have lives, or do they exist solely to interfere with my efforts to shed a little light on some of the ignorant prejudices that reside within its pea-sized brain? I'll tell you what I think the answer is. I can't prove it, but if I'm correct, events soon will prove me right. I think that every time it utters or writes a statement that supports narcissism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that anyone who resists it deserves to be crushed. I unequivocally aver we mustn't let it make such statements, partly because it has no soul, but primarily because I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with Mods that try to ban mods and its underlings, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that Mods that try to ban mods will instill a general ennui because it possesses a hatred that defies all logic and understanding, that cannot be quantified or reasoned away, and that savagely possesses clueless trolls with intellectually challenged and uncontrollable rage.

Let me mention again that Mods that try to ban mods's secret passion is to kill the messenger and control the message. For shame! We should not concern ourselves with Mods that try to ban mods's putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and the fact that brusque and headlong, Mods that try to ban mods's expostulations resemble a dilapidated shed. Kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will collapse, proving my claim that if I were to compile a list of Mods that try to ban mods's forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that either Mods that try to ban mods has no real conception of the sweep of history, or it is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context. Should someone think that I am saying too much, I am not saying too much, but much too little. For Mods that try to ban mods's argument that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive is hopelessly flawed and thoroughly circuitous. Far be it for me to give expression to that which is most destructive and most harmful to society.

The only weapons Mods that try to ban mods has in its intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all it has, and it knows it. As everyone knows, Mods that try to ban mods's maudlin, kissy-pooh, feel-good, touchy-feely litanies are actually quite villainous when you look at them a bit closer. What you might not know, however, is that its claim that Dadaism brings one closer to nirvana is not only an attack on the concept of objectivity, but an assault on the human mind. Finally, to those of you who are faithfully helping me raise issues, as opposed to guns or knives, let me extend, as always, my deepest gratitude and my most affectionate regards.

<font color="#cd6600" size="1">[ May 31, 2005 10:57 PM: Message edited by: -megalithanod ]</font>

LMFAO!

where does Yig FIND this stuff?!? [img]biggrin.gif[/img]

Mr. George Lucas thinks that he can override nature. Unfortunately for him, he's wrong. Let me start by stressing that I am not attempting to suppress anyone's opinions, nor do I intend to demean him personally for his beliefs or worldviews. But I do believe that I must comment on a phenomenon that has and will continue to apotheosize complacent gutter-dwellers. His hangers-on's thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be. He should think twice before he decides to deface a social fabric that was already deteriorating, and I'm not making that up!

If you think that scary, ridiculous voluptuaries make the best scout leaders and schoolteachers, then you're suffering from very serious nearsightedness. You're focusing too much on what he wants you to see and failing to observe many other things of much greater importance. I am cognizant that it is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt, but Lucas's idiotic claim that he is a model citizen is just that, an idiotic claim.

It has been said that the "freedom" that Lucas is always so keen to talk about is a sheep's freedom to choose the patch of grass in which it will graze while growing wool and mutton for its owners. That makes sense to me. I believe it's true. But it unmistakably implies that many people respond to Lucas's egocentric, hidebound equivocations in much the same way that they respond to television dramas. They watch them; they talk about them; but they feel no overwhelming compulsion to do anything about them. That's why I insist we respond to Lucas's policies. Even with the increasing number of prissy cads, he complains a lot. What's ironic, though, is that he hasn't made even a single concrete suggestion for improvement or identified a single problem with the system as it exists today. Let us now stop the Huns at the gate, because in that is our only hope for the future.

and the dancing wookie just brings that all home [img]smile.gif[/img]

I sit in sad repose as I put pen to paper concerning an issue I find most deeply disturbing. The points I plan to make in this letter will sound tediously familiar to everyone who wants to give direction to a universal human development of culture, ethics, and morality. Nevertheless, Star Trek's proposed social programs represent a backward step of hundreds of years, a backward step into a chasm with no bottom save the endless darkness of death. Rest assured, there are three fairly obvious problems with Star Trek's beliefs, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to shelter initially unpopular truths from suppression, enabling them to ultimately win out through competition in the marketplace of ideas. First, I can barely contain myself from going into a laughing fit when I see one of these disaffected, bloody-minded Neanderthals. Second, what Star Trek is doing falls just short of giving handguns to schoolchildren. And third, Star Trek just reported that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. Do you think that that's merely sloppy reporting on Star Trek's part? I don't. I think that it's a deliberate attempt to rewrite and reword much of humanity's formative works to favor Bonapartism.

Others may disagree, but I think that Star Trek has certainly never given evidence of thinking extensively. Or at all, for that matter. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that I wouldn't judge Star Trek's allies too harshly. They're unquestionably just cannon fodder for Star Trek's plot to force us to bow down low before logorrheic nonentities. Star Trek teaches workshops on elitism. Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist re-education camp. No matter how much talk and analysis occurs, I see how important Star Trek's ignorant ramblings are to its lieutenants and I laugh. I laugh because I've never bothered it. Yet it wants to move intellectually challenged recidivism from the anal-retentive fringe into a realm of respectability. Whatever happened to "live and let live"?