he has GOT to be the dumbest sheep i've ever seen
CLICK
BAA BAA!
EWE! EWE!
Printable View
he has GOT to be the dumbest sheep i've ever seen
CLICK
BAA BAA!
EWE! EWE!
Do you have any words he would understand?
Your country is doomed [img]frown.gif[/img]
WTF?!
<font size="4" face="Tempus Sans ITC, Tahoma">Man... this makes me feel like going over to the white house and kissing a man in plain view of the president.Quote:
Still, he urged Americans not to ostracize gays.
"I am mindful that we're all sinners, and I caution those who may try to take the speck out of the neighbor's eye when they got a log in their own," the president said, invoking a biblical passage from the Gospel of St. Matthew.
argumentum ad populum?
circulus in demonstrando?
ignoratio elenchi?
slippery slope?
you decide [img]tongue.gif[/img]
LOL....
i've known that for a while now [img]frown.gif[/img]
I wish Ross Perot would run again.
you would.
I thought us conservatives were supposed to be the hate mongers,but it says right in your post you,shatzy,are the one with the hateful heart.Care to drop a label on yourself like liberal,independent,communist or are you a hateful freethinker?
BTW, I see nothing wrong with leaving the definition of marriage as that between one man and one woman.
All of the above.
<font size="4" face="Tempus Sans ITC, Tahoma">Well, i think the freedom of marriage for persons , not genders is the right way to go. Basically it's a form of discrimination on the ground of sexual preference and gender applied to marriage, which, if i may add, is no 'magic' thing that has to be protected above all but simply is a custom that was introduced some time ago (a few hundred years) which is clung to with the ferocity of someone afraid to let go of the past.Quote:
Originally posted by Trampis:
I thought us conservatives were supposed to be the hate mongers,but it says right in your post you,shatzy,are the one with the hateful heart.Care to drop a label on yourself like liberal,independent,communist or are you a hateful freethinker?
BTW, I see nothing wrong with leaving the definition of marriage as that between one man and one woman.