Looking at these pics, it seems to me it will be another statue?
http://photos.figures.com/photo/1/sh...25307&cat=2939
Printable View
Looking at these pics, it seems to me it will be another statue?
http://photos.figures.com/photo/1/sh...25307&cat=2939
I hope not...
Those are the 2ups - I dont think they articulate those... (I hope)
Mandy 1 practically was, I dont see why this one wouldn't be... but, it's fixable [img]graemlins/devil.gif[/img]
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I think they do. And that fig doesn't look like it's got much articulation. Damn. This was one I was hoping DID have joints. They could have been hidden easily. [img]frown.gif[/img]Quote:
Originally posted by Drau:
Those are the 2ups - I dont think they articulate those... (I hope)
Yeah, McF always articulates their 2-ups. Hence the reason the sculpts look so similar from proto to production.
actually it looks like it has some articulation to me. the knees for sure. especially since the proto pics have been crouched and the teaser image had it standing straight up
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">The standing photo also could have been early in the design stage. Things do have a way of changing....or it might just be the angle it was taken at.Quote:
Originally posted by S-Mart Manager:
actually it looks like it has some articulation to me. the knees for sure. especially since the proto pics have been crouched and the teaser image had it standing straight up
Im still pretty dead set on it being the angle for that.... it (the sihlouette) was a sideways (profile, sort of?) shot, if the legs are basically in the same linear... line... thingie [img]eek.gif[/img] then it'll looks just like he's standing up... it also means it could be a wobbly figure.... [img]confused.gif[/img]
personally on this figure I wouldnt mind if there is no articulation. I have all the other versions side by side in one position and this will just stand next to them
todd stated in his panel discussion at sdcc that the figure is very articulated.
Yeah, but 'very articulated' to Todd is probably 3 points.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">he's always been very forthright about their lack of articulation in the past. never have they promised it. in fact, todd has said they trade articulation for sculpt...so he is aware or the difference. so it would seem fair to assume it will be well articulated.Quote:
Originally posted by Peter Hoffman:
Yeah, but 'very articulated' to Todd is probably 3 points.
I know, I'm just being a dick. [img]biggrin.gif[/img]
But somebody on the WB said that crowinghorse interviewed the design team and they said it wasn't very articulated.
So...who to believe? [img]graemlins/hmmm.gif[/img]
He said "very articulated"?.....Hmmmmmmm. [img]graemlins/wonder.gif[/img]
yeah, but, having a ball-joint at all could be considered really articulated for the dood.
I dunno, wait and see, it's what they did in the days before the intraweb.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yeah, but before the intraweb McFarlane toys were always articulated. [img]wink.gif[/img]Quote:
Originally posted by Toymank:
yeah, but, having a ball-joint at all could be considered really articulated for the dood.
I dunno, wait and see, it's what they did in the days before the intraweb.
<font color="#cd6600" size="1">[ July 18, 2005 07:52 AM: Message edited by: Chosen One ]</font>
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">i think the words were...very well articulated. but im giving 3rd hand info. i wasnt at sdcc.Quote:
Originally posted by Nomalas:
He said "very articulated"?.....Hmmmmmmm. [img]graemlins/wonder.gif[/img]
I think I'll be OK no matter what they do just as long as the paint comes out well in this figure's case
if it ain't, it damn well will be when I'm done with it.
I was at that panel and that's what he said.