-
ok. i've had it....
i'm finally making a thread on 'inference'...
its really pissing me off.
why is it so commonplace to infer extraneous
shit when its obvious that you should only
interpret from what is there??
now i'm not talking about the types of
inference one would partake in when reading
metaphor... because metaphor relies on
inference to make it complete.
i'm also not referring to scientific inference
because NORMALLY, when science infers...
it does so with the intention to determine
its inference in relation to 'fact'.
i'm talking about TYPICAL inference that
causes interpretations to become skewed...
or, the typical reaction to add more into
a scenario in order to 'fill in the blanks'
based on a necessary outcome one wishes.
example (this is elementary, i know):
X + Y = Z
there is no other inference you can obtain
from this sentence other than the following:
Y + X = Z
Z - X = Y
Z - Y = X
(as well as much more advanced equations
that i refuse to devote time into typing out)
... IF we are basing the 'fact' on face-value
deductions.
my question...
wtf is the act of incorrect inference so
friggin common????
-
-
Because we don't know the values of x, y, or z. for example. let's say that x = 1, y = 2 and z = 4. then those equations would be incorrect. we infer that the values of x, y, and z are values such that the equations do in fact hold true...and also because cow cud is a twin...and what does that mean anyways?
-
tee hee... you proved my point, gt.
you inferred values.. in that those values (of
X, Y, and Z) could possibly be incorrect.
but that is not what the sentence states.
it simply states that:
X + Y = Z
based on the face-value information you have,
XYZ could represent any value that causes the
equation to be 'true'... not false.
had a question of the validity of the equation
accompanied the equation... then your inference
would be spot-on... but that is what i'm saying.
if the equation were replaced with a worded
sentence, such as:
this morning, i made eggs for breakfast.
you have no reason to infer that i didn't make
eggs for breakfast this morning.
you see?
-
-
but what kind of eggs? were they ostrich eggs? a dinosaur egg? do you keep the eggs in your sofa? how were the eggs cooked? were they scrambled...i like scrambled eggs with bacon bits and cheese it it. also some minced onions, although the minced onions dry it out alot. i also like strawberry covered pancakes from IHOP...did you make pancakes for breakfast also?
-
either/both [img]graemlins/devil.gif[/img]
-
the real question here is:
Do you feel at all better now Shatzy? [img]smile.gif[/img]
-
i do now that you've posted!
its been so long, girl!
i've been keeping an eye on your board...
saw that jackass post someone made...
hope mcspikey is doin ok.
hell... what am i saying all of this for on my board?
i'll mosey on over to yours! [img]tongue.gif[/img]
-
thanks for keeping an eye over there
yes, jackass is right, but what am I gonna do?
how are things? and gay boy? j/k hehe
-
do you even KNOW those people posting that shit?
are they kidding?
'gay boy' tee hee.... [img]graemlins/thumbs_up.gif[/img]
-
-
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Tempus Sans ITC, Tahoma">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#000000"><font size=2 face="Tempus Sans ITC, Tahoma">Originally posted by shatzy:
tee hee... you proved my point, gt.
you inferred values.. in that those values (of
X, Y, and Z) could possibly be incorrect.
but that is not what the sentence states.
this morning, i made eggs for breakfast.
you have no reason to infer that i didn't make
eggs for breakfast this morning.
you see?</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>
Were you speaking of THIS morning as in when you posted this or when you knew I would read it?
CYA [img]biggrin.gif[/img]
