Forums

What does the rules say about who is allowed to join certain topics. Just asking a question? Not sure of the reasons why.

How many names do you have?

I think Rusty Shackleford will be his next (Dale Dribbles alias).

Dale Gribble dane, not dribble

wow.. finally beenie weenie backs it not so obvious that he wants his religiong board back...

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: steer</div><div class="ubbcode-body">wow.. finally beenie weenie backs it not so obvious that he wants his religiong board back... </div></div>

Not trying to start anything or defend anyone, but what if by the off chance you all are wrong & you all are ragging on this new user for no reason? Like I said I dont want to start anything or have a huge pointless debate over it, Im just curious.

If it's not him it's his evil twin (or would that be his "good twin"?)

Maybe I've not been paying close attention or over thinking things on here, but I really havent seen much of anything to prove that he is pacman. I just think that if he really is just a new user that doesnt even know who pacman is then its really bad for everyone to always be ragging on him, I mean its like no one has even considered the possibility that it might be a different user.

It has been considered. He'd been given the benefit of the doubt for several days. Some may still think he's just a regular newbie, but PacMan has a hard time controlling his actions, way of speech, and habits. He's transparent.

Aphrodite, if you don't think beenie weenie is Pac-Man, ask yourself some simple questions:

Why are their posting styles so similar (i.e. responding to multiple replies in a thread all in a row, all w/quotes to the users he's responding to)?
Why would a person with less than 15 posts on this board be asking to be put on boards like the Religion one?
Why are their writing styles so similar?

It follows a pattern. weedeater did the same thing after a few posts on here, and ultimately it was Pac-Man, one & the same. It's common sense.

You don't believe me on any of those questions? Go back and look at weedeater's initial posts here, and then compare them back to beenie weenie's. Dude makes it way too easy to track because he has an easily traceable agenda--to post on the Religion forum, and dog out the mods & admins on here for giving due punishment for continuously breaking the rules and ignoring any and all requests to stop spamming the boards.

You keep on defending Pac-Man and his many aliases on here everytime this crops up. If you think we're unfair to start with, why not PM us and complain? We'll listen to it. You've heard them on the other new board whine, moan, and complain about us--ever thought to listen to our side of the story???

There is logic and as of this moment, they are given the benefit of the doubt.

Are they removed? No they aren't.

Are they allowed in the religious/politics forums? No they aren't.

One thing, when the boards were created, the first comment rule was that people had to be of age, or prove that they could discuss such 'hot button topics' in an adult manner. Has a person who hasn't posted but a handful of posts (and of those, the majority have been complaining about not having access to the forums) proven this? I would guess no.

Due to the person who won't follow rules, including accepting bans, the control over those forums had to be tightened a bit. So basically, even if this person isn't the infamous Pacman, they are suffering (just like any other new user will) due to him.

Yes the posting style is similar but maybe it could be just a coincidence. As for wanting to post on the religious forum right off the bat, I have seen other people on boards before that that was their ONLY reason for being a member was to talk about religion. Like I said I do not mean to start an argument or defend anyone I was just wondering why.

?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: aphrodite4evermore</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: steer</div><div class="ubbcode-body">wow.. finally beenie weenie backs it not so obvious that he wants his religiong board back... </div></div>

Not trying to start anything or defend anyone, but what if by the off chance you all are wrong & you all are ragging on this new user for no reason? Like I said I dont want to start anything or have a huge pointless debate over it, Im just curious.
</div></div>Well, I have figured out what the problem may be. I see that these people think that I am someone else and just because I requested to gain access to forums they know who I am. Well, I had heard alot about this forum and liked they say you must not speak truely what you believe because a certain few puts a name to you even know that these people can in no way show anything that I have said to DISRESPECT one person. If anyone can find anything that I have said to be mean to you or anyone else please make so everyone can see it. I beleive if you can't that all should call me by my name and treat me with the same respect that I give you guys. I thought that the rerason this site was created was for the reason to show differences of thougts and ideas. I guess just because I made to many post or wrote to much I am someone that is being banned off of certain forums (POLITICAL) becasue I asked to begiven permission by Mr. Rocketer. I would be thankful to anyone that understands my position or maybe they have been done the same. Let's not be to quick to assume anything without hard evidence.

THANKS TO ALL RESPECTFUL PEOPLE.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: R0cketer</div><div class="ubbcode-body">There is logic and as of this moment, they are given the benefit of the doubt.

Are they removed? No they aren't.

Are they allowed in the religious/politics forums? No they aren't.

One thing, when the boards were created, the first comment rule was that people had to be of age, or prove that they could discuss such 'hot button topics' in an adult manner. Has a person who hasn't posted but a handful of posts (and of those, the majority have been complaining about not having access to the forums) proven this? I would guess no.

Due to the person who won't follow rules, including accepting bans, the control over those forums had to be tightened a bit. So basically, even if this person isn't the infamous Pacman, they are suffering (just like any other new user will) due to him.

</div></div>Well, I can fully understand that. But is there a certain amount of post I must make before I can prove that I can act like and adult and talk like one as well. I would be thankful to you for a estimate amount of post that I must make before I may be granted access. Thank You for your time Sir.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: beenie weenie</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: R0cketer</div><div class="ubbcode-body">There is logic and as of this moment, they are given the benefit of the doubt.

Are they removed? No they aren't.

Are they allowed in the religious/politics forums? No they aren't.

One thing, when the boards were created, the first comment rule was that people had to be of age, or prove that they could discuss such 'hot button topics' in an adult manner. Has a person who hasn't posted but a handful of posts (and of those, the majority have been complaining about not having access to the forums) proven this? I would guess no.

Due to the person who won't follow rules, including accepting bans, the control over those forums had to be tightened a bit. So basically, even if this person isn't the infamous Pacman, they are suffering (just like any other new user will) due to him.

</div></div>Well, I can fully understand that. But is there a certain amount of post I must make before I can prove that I can act like and adult and talk like one as well. I would be thankful to you for a estimate amount of post that I must make before I may be granted access. Thank You for your time Sir. </div></div>I noticed that some people have learned to keep there mouth shut if they dont agree with the click. Well, I guess you guys have what you want. I can recall when I was in middle school that was the way me and my friends acted because we was scared of the 3rd grader and we didn't say anything or he would have beat us up. Just think that is similiar to these sight anyone else agree or can anyone us stand up for what is right or dont want to be removed from the other sites as well. [img]/LDPforum/ubbthreads/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif[/img] Everyone have a great day.

One word: psychosis.

Let's talk about Marilyn Manson...and maybe throw in a few dinosaurs!

Those 3 posts did NOTHING to change my mind...if nothing else, just furthered my reasons to assume this is Pac-hokie-'eater.

I hocked a loogie about 1500 feet yesterday.

How sad does a person have to be to keep going where they aren't wanted.

Someone has issues.

HMMMM more multiple posts in order to respond instead of putting it all in one section. Another reference to a "click" (Could have swore it was clique). Sounds like someone with history on here doesn't it.

Anybody else besides me entertaining the possibility that it is an intelligent poster scoffing at the world vs pacman deal that is on here, copying his style, and chuckling at the group that is convinced that it is him? Seriously, anybody with half a brain could just as easily copy a former poster's (who is no longer with us) sing-song style word for word, and have this entire board convinced that it is "him". Just throwing out the possibility friends.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 1inStripes</div><div class="ubbcode-body">HMMMM more multiple posts in order to respond instead of putting it all in one section. Another reference to a "click" (Could have swore it was clique). Sounds like someone with history on here doesn't it.</div></div>

Mugatu.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Indian_Dad</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Anybody else besides me entertaining the possibility that it is an intelligent poster scoffing at the world vs pacman deal that is on here, copying his style, and chuckling at the group that is convinced that it is him? Seriously, anybody with half a brain could just as easily copy a former poster's (who is no longer with us) sing-song style word for word, and have this entire board convinced that it is "him". Just throwing out the possibility friends.</div></div>

Could be. But if this person gets banned because of it, he only has 1 person under about 4 other screen names to thank for him getting banned due to his copy cat style.

But if that poster was already a member who's doing this as some sort of gag, then they're not really banned. They play the gag, get the username banned, and can enjoy the whole thing in relative safety. This would be an instance I would think using IPs to identify a user would be helpful. Doesn't always work, but it's worth the try.

It is possible. However if someone is doing that, then that user name deserves to be banned anyhow.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: beenie weenie</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: beenie weenie</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: R0cketer</div><div class="ubbcode-body">There is logic and as of this moment, they are given the benefit of the doubt.

Are they removed? No they aren't.

Are they allowed in the religious/politics forums? No they aren't.

One thing, when the boards were created, the first comment rule was that people had to be of age, or prove that they could discuss such 'hot button topics' in an adult manner. Has a person who hasn't posted but a handful of posts (and of those, the majority have been complaining about not having access to the forums) proven this? I would guess no.

Due to the person who won't follow rules, including accepting bans, the control over those forums had to be tightened a bit. So basically, even if this person isn't the infamous Pacman, they are suffering (just like any other new user will) due to him.

</div></div>Well, I can fully understand that. But is there a certain amount of post I must make before I can prove that I can act like and adult and talk like one as well. I would be thankful to you for a estimate amount of post that I must make before I may be granted access. Thank You for your time Sir. </div></div>I noticed that some people have learned to keep there mouth shut if they dont agree with the click. Well, I guess you guys have what you want. I can recall when <span style="color: #FF0000">I was in middle school</span> that was the way me and my friends acted because we was <span style="color: #FF0000">scared of the 3rd grader </span>and we didn't say anything or he would have beat us up. Just think that is similiar to these sight anyone else agree or can anyone us stand up for what is right or dont want to be removed from the other sites as well. [img]/LDPforum/ubbthreads/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif[/img] Everyone have a great day. </div></div>



Sad...Middle school where I come from is 6th - 8th grade.....Sad...