-
No offense to the majority of Norton fans
R13 may be the biggest idiot in the history of this board, and thats saying something. Even if I wasn't biased in my support of Clintwood against Norton, I'd go to the game and support Clintwood and hope to God they won just to watch him self destruct. He seems like a smart kid but damn...
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
http://www.hostboard.com/LDPforum/ub...862#Post286862
You just now figuring this out? Heck I can stir it as well as any,but I do have a relatively open mind. This kid thinks he hung the moon and stars [img]/LDPforum/ubbthreads/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/crazy.gif[/img]
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
I'll be there on the green side. As I posted, CW, PV, and GC can win and act like they've done it before. JJ Kelly and JI Burton.........
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
...and as I posted,JJK won at Bullitt for the first time in 30 years,could have acted like jackasses,but didn't. Did they celebrate? Of course-was a huge win that was crucial for the post-season. Did they taunt/were classless about it? Absolutely not. You have no point here.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: PVFAN</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'll be there on the green side. As I posted, CW, PV, and GC can win and act like they've done it before. JJ Kelly and JI Burton......... </div></div>
just finish it out...lol
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
Just look at the stupid signs posted on Wise's fence. Indian Dad bulletin board material. I am a hater of stupidity.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
You really are a genious. Ever seen a game without signs? Hater of stupidity? More like the epitome of stupidity you are.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
Signs like that have no place on fences. Not a genious but have some common sense. Good luck in round 1 of the playoffs.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
I'm hopin' that 1st round game is PV.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
Don't think that you don't have company on that. I'd love to see PV again.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
Well, we agree on something.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
Tearing up pieces of the field? Was a member of two LPD Championship Teams, a Region D Championship Team and a State Finalist team and we never did that once.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
No, I was referring to hoping to see KY Jelly in the playoffs opposite PV.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
does PV even still have a shot at the playoffs?
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
Yes and barring being upset by Appy or Pound or a Honaker upset over Tazwell they will be in
And they actualy still have a shot at the #3 seed on top of that
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
Unbelievable. Not that im complaining...just unbelievable.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
IMO, the current playoff system is a joke.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
Right not Div 2 Looks like
#1 GC
#2 Kelly
#3 Leb
#4 PV
-------(Still in the running)
#5 Honaker
#6 VHS
If Clintwood and Haysi had stayed Div2 it would be
#1 Clintwood
#2 GC
#3 Kelly
#4 Haysi
---------(Still in the running)
No One
Div 1 would have been
#1 Burton
#2 TS
#3 Castlewood
#4 TW
------------(Still in the running)
#5 Hurley
#6 Coeburn
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
thanks counts. where you getting the info from? or are you just totalling the points yourself? I used to keep up with it, but since PV was losing so bad this year, I just didnt keep up with it like I used to
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GreenMonster</div><div class="ubbcode-body">IMO, the current playoff system is a joke. </div></div>
While I do not like the idea of 5-5 or 4-6 teams makeing the playoffs both PV, Honaker and Lee have all played tough schedules and could have a much better record if they were to water it down
Plus I like seeing a 9-1 or 8-2 team sitting at home even less
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Shooter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">thanks counts. where you getting the info from? or are you just totalling the points yourself? I used to keep up with it, but since PV was losing so bad this year, I just didnt keep up with it like I used to </div></div>
I get current points from here
Link
And do the what if situations after around week 7/8
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
Here is my long Div 2 breakdown not claiming that there may not be a few errors in it LOL
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Gate City 178
Kelly 161
Lebanon 132
PV 127
Honaker 118
GATE CITY
----------------
Win over Lee 20-22
Win over Norton 32-34 Loss to Norton 13-14
Richlands = 2-4
Tazwell= 0-2 (2 being most likely)
Lebanon= 2-4
Appy = 0
Va High= 2-4
Battle= 0
Clintwood= 2-4
PV = 4
Gate city at 9-1 = 242 ? 256
Gate City at 8-2= 223 ? 236
KELLY
Win over Appy 18
Win over Haysi 30-32 Loss 12-13
Twin Springs = 0-4
Pound = 0
Burton = 0-2
Coeburn = 0-2
Grundy = 0
RC = 0-4
PV = 4
Clintwood = 0-2
Kelly at 8-2 = 213 ? 227
Kelly at 7-3 = 195 ? 208
LEBANON
Win over Battle 16
Win over Tazwell 34-36 Loss to Tazwell = 16-17
Honaker =2-4
PV = 4
GC = 1-2
Clintwood = 1-2
Northwood = 0-2
Giles = 0-3
VHS = 0-4
Lee = 0-3
Lebanon at 7-3 = 192 ? 210
Lebanon at 6-4 = 174 ? 191
PV
WIN over Appy 18
Win over Pound 22
Lee = 0-4
Lebanon = 0-2
Richlands = 2-4
Burton = 0-2
Clintwood = 1-2
TW = 2-4
Kelly = 2-4
Gate City = 1-2
PV = 177 ? 191
Honaker
Win over Hurly 28
Win over Tazwell 34-36 Loss to Tazwell = 16-17
Lebanon = 0-2
Richlands = 1-2
TV = 0-2
PH = 0-4
Haysi = 0-2
Abington = 0-2
VHS = 0-2
Burton = 0-2
Honaker at 5-5 = 181 ? 200
Honaker at 4-6 = 163 - 181
So it looks like Honaker will need to win out to make the playoffs but if they do they have a shot at the #3 If Lebanon drops one of there last 2 games and some other games shake out right
If Honaker losses one of those games PV is in at #4 with a shot at #3 if Lebanon drops there Tazwell games and a few other games shak out there way
Lebanon is in with a win over Battle and a win over Tazwell will get then #3 seed with a shot at the #2seed if Wise drops there game to Haysi and a few other games shake out
</div></div>
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
Here is my long Div 1 breakdown
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">OK Here are the Power point break downs as I see them (Only going to do the team I think are still a threat)
Div1 Current
#1 Clintwood 183
#2 Burton 182
#3 Haysi 149
#4 TS 137
#5 Castlewood 136
#6 Thomas Walker 122
Clintwood:
OK Clintwood has Burton and Pound left
I will assume that Pound finishes the year 3-7 Total Points: 22
A win over burton will provide 32-34 Points while a loss will provide 13-14 points
Coeburn only has 1 game left this season vs Castlewood Point difference will be 0-2
Haysi will give then 0-4 extra points
Appy 0 (I don't see them winning another game)
Vol 0-2
Lebanon 2-4 (don't see them loseing to battle)
PV 4 (I see them beating Pound and Appy)
GC 1-2
Kelly 2-4
(Haysi/Kelly guarentees Clintwood 2 points above there possible low but will not add to there High)
Clintwood 9-1: 248 ? 261
Clintwood 8-2: 229 ? 241
Burton :
Will Have Clintwood and GC left
A win over Clintwood will give them 32 Points a Loss 13
A win over GC 32 a loss 13
RC: 2-4 (St Paul is a giveme but the TS will be tough)
Appy 0
Kelly 2-4
PV 4
Coeburn 0-2
Pound 0
Honaker 2-4 (4 is a stretch with Tazwell)
TW 2-4
Burton at 10-0: 258 ? 268
Burton at 9-1: 239 ? 249
Burton at 8-2: 220-230
Haysi has Lee and Wise left
Win over Lee gets them 22-26 (22 being the most likely) a Loss 8-10 (8 being the most likely)
Win over Kelly gets them 30 a loss 12
Grundy 0
Clintwood 1-2
Tug Valley 0-4 (no clue on there schedude)
Honaker 2-4
Twin Valley 2-4 (Win over Ervinton)
Ervinton 0-2 (Not sure how bad Jenkins is)
Hurly 2
East Ridge -0-4(no clue on there schedude)
Haysi at 9-1: 208- 227
Haysi at 8-2(Wise loss): 190-209
Haysi at 7-3: 176-193
I am not sure that there is a point to doing the CD teams as the team that end up winning the CD is in and the others are out
I will do TS
Games left TW and RC
TW Win:26 Loss:10
RC 24
Kelly 1-2
Holston 0-1
Chilhowie 1
Battle 0
St paul 0
Ervinton 0
Coeburn 0-2
Castlewood -0-4
I will add 3 guarenteed points to the TS total due to the Castlewood/Holston and Coeburn/Castlewood game
TS at 7-3: 192 ? 197
TS at 6-4: 176 ? 181
So Clintwood looks to have the #1 or #2 seed locked up
A 9-1 Haysi could outpoint a 8-2 Burton but it would require a few upsets
And if TS wins out they will be neck and neck with Haysi if they slip up in one of there last 2 games
</div></div>
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
We appreciate your work on breaking that mess down. I know it is a headache [img]/LDPforum/ubbthreads/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/cool.gif[/img]
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
He can't spell worth sh!t, but he's a whiz with numbers. [img]/LDPforum/ubbthreads/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smile.gif[/img]
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
By looking at this I see how stupid this system really is, it's possible that CW could beat Burton go 9-1 and Burton be 9-1 (CW obviously played harder schedule) and Burton get the 1 seed. It's also much more likely that PV could outpoint Lebanon with a worse record while Lebanon beat them. LHS isn't playing the deaf and blind out of conference either, Honaker, PV, Giles, CW, etc.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
Honistly i think when the VHSL re-twiqed its powerpoint nembers a few years back it was a step in thge wrong direction. (i.e. beating Ervinton at 0-10 gets you 16 points loseing to GC at 9-1 gets you 13 points)
So if you can get a team that is not very good but playes a horrable schedule you are better off (Playing a team like Hurley will get you as many points as Lebanon this season without the threat of loseing)
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
I liked the +10 model they used for years...take the Division and +10 for each win...+0 for a loss...and points for every team that a team you beat has won. That's simple enough and fair enough.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
In that one it is worse get 10 points for beating Ervinton and 0 for Loseing to GC
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
Nope...cuz Ervinton is prolly gonna win 1 game...GC is gonna win 8, so you get the points for playing them and the points for their wins...so if ya lose you still get 10 vs. 12 for beating Ervinton. It cuts into the points you lose for playing a quality opponent. The way it is now, you get penalized too much for losing to a good team.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
If you were average the smartest thing you could do would be to play Thomas Walker and Hurley every year. Due to the district they are in they are always going to win a few games.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
Hurley especially..cuz they only have 3 district games and can play 7 sisters of the poor from KY and WV to boost their record...TW not so much cuz they don't win very much in the CD even..lol
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
TW has helped us out a ton the last two seasons, more than I expected. If Grundy ever goes BDD we need to pick them up again.
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sup-rbeast</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hurley especially..cuz they only have 3 district games and can play 7 sisters of the poor from KY and WV to boost their record...TW not so much cuz they don't win very much in the CD even..lol </div></div>
Which is why it is probably next to impossable to get them on your schedule
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sup-rbeast</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Nope...cuz Ervinton is prolly gonna win 1 game...GC is gonna win 8, so you get the points for playing them and the points for their wins...so if ya lose you still get 10 vs. 12 for beating Ervinton. It cuts into the points you lose for playing a quality opponent. The way it is now, you get penalized too much for losing to a good team. </div></div>
I misread your other post you are right the 10 point with Rider points for winning or loseing is better
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
CW doesn't need to schedule Hurley unless you want to watch the starters sit on the sidelines....lol. As for Hurley's view, why take a beat down when you can play East Ridge, Tug Valley, Betsy Layne, etc and still have a chance to get in the playoffs once every 5 years?
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
I was not saying that Clintwood should play Hurly but I can see the advantage to playing them
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
I don't even go to "blow out games"...I'm still yet to see PV play TW..
-
Re: No offense to the majority of Norton fans
Which is the down side.....Football takes alot of cash and at most schools it is a big funder of the other sports so the need for wins has to be balanced against the need for huge gates