Can it be?

If nothings wrong, everythings wrong.

If everythings wrong, nothings right.

If nothings right, then the first statement is wrong.

How does this happen... because it does...

you typed it that way [img]wink.gif[/img]

BLAH BLAH BLAH!!!!
Damn you woman!
Make me a god!

ok.
just as soon as you change that teal in your
moto board...

and if tg says you can be god.

Can I be the patron saint of Shiner Bock?

LOL....its all yours, girl!

I wanna be the patron saint of nakedness!!!
like a naked man in the buff, i'm squeeky clean!

i thought that title belonged to adam...
that or any other lunatic...

eh...you'll do.

*poof*

tautology ------>pure and simple.

soulfilms...

your intelligence is always refreshing.

damn girl...

you rock.

THANK YOU! THANKYOU! of course, i always knew i was a genius, now everyone else is starting to see it too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

and SO modest!

boy! you ARE modest!

thats so unlike you, SF!

Modesty, how becoming...

If nothings wrong, everythings wrong.
If everythings wrong, nothings right.

If nothings right, then the first statement is wrong.

let's see.... eeehm..
lets say that A denotates all.
and that x means wrong, and y means right
and let ! mean not, then
x <> !y
(wrong is not right, and vice versa)
converting your phrases to logic would imply that
!Ax <> Ax ( you said wrong twice)
(If nothings wrong, everythings wrong.)
and
Ax <> !A y
(If everythings wrong, nothings right.)

do you see how your system falls apart at the first statement?
you claim that not being wrong means that it is wrong, and vice versa. which is an inconsistent preposition
(allthough i might have completely messed my logic up, it's been years)

waaaaaaaaaaay ahead of ya, zela

yeah, but i couldn't help showing off [img]wink.gif[/img]