Who wins
Printable View
Who wins
R.E.M
Velvet Underground were good for their time, but they don't have eternal classic like REM I don't think. Losing My Religion, Everybody Hurts, Nightswimming
R.E.M
I'm sticking with Velvet Underground. <---- see what i did there.
You moron - "Velvet Underground were good for their time", what the fuck's that supposed to mean, what's changed in the last thirty years to make their music any less relevant, nothing because no-one ever followed on from where they left off, they'll always be just as radical as they ever were
I just don't see the point in trying to compare them to Q and VH1's favourite vaguely arty popsters - the Velvets will always be too dangerous to enjoy the dubious pleasures of such safe consumer consumption
And Everybody Hurts is shit isn't it - string arrangements by Led Zeppelin's bassist, go figure
Automatic For The People is better than The Velvet Underground and Nico which is the best VU album.
The VU are to obsecure to appeal as bigger audience as REM.
Guess thats why I prefer REM
You're weird!
or just stupid
or just stupid
I'm a bit behind, are Oingy_Boingy and Oingy_Boingo the people they say they are in my signatures?
Velvet Undeground vs REM.
What kind of conest of that.
Two different bands, with two different musical styles, two different ethos'. It's a joke, you can't say which one is better when they are so different.
On what criteria are they being judged? The VU were undoubtedly a ground breaking band music and attitude wise, whereas REM brought us jangly ballads (The Byrds anyone?).
Anyhoo I like both bands, but to compare one to the other is ridiculous.
Don't be a nob.
hi, never posted here...
but i like the subject so i'm replying.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#DDDDDD"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Originally posted by Oingo_Boingo:
Velvet Underground were good for their time, but they don't have eternal classic like REM I don't think.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>
then i guess that explains why REM did quite
a few covers of VU songs on the DEAD LETTER album.
you're right, VU isn't timeless.
http://us.f1.yahoofs.com/users/d5751...bApd9Apm8gF2Cj http://us.f1.yahoofs.com/users/d5751...bApd9Apm8gF2Cj
i think the oingy boingy crew are joking
Velevet Underground would probably win even tho the geetarist (and some one else i think) is dead, cos the drummer left REM so they are down to three members and one is a hom. VU are from NYC so they are pretty bad ass for a girls band. But REM are from the deep south so they could get some Klan buddies to help. Having said that, the velvet underground could get some drag queens on their side, and they fight nasty.
R.E.M