Typical liberal hypocrisy again.

Printable View

September 2nd, 2008, 04:43 AM
travelinman

Does anyone else see the BS The BS is feeding us.

If there was a ?Progressive? woman in a stable relationship wanting to become the VP he would defend her right to it, but since she is a conservative he questions her commitment to her children.

Let?s not look at the fact that her husband has quit his full time job to take care of the family.

Then there is the daughter becoming pregnant. I?m sure TBS and the rest of the liberals would think it all great if she aborted the baby. Their pissed because she chooses to carry it to term and not stick a knife in its head.

So tell me BS you ever have sex before marriage? Opps my mistake.
September 2nd, 2008, 07:26 PM
travelinman

Quote:

Originally posted by The Big Sexy:
[

On the contrary. Yet another Palin is brought into this world without a mother. Running for office will be a 7 day a week job with little rest.

So when special needs boy and the newly illegitimate come into this world (or are they one and the same, who knows?), Sarah Palin will be nowhere to be found. Guaranteed.

[ September 02, 2008 01:28 PM: Message edited by: The Big Sexy ]

So from this I gather her husband is not capable of raising the children.

What do you know a chauvinistic fag.
September 2nd, 2008, 07:54 PM
reason

Quote:

Originally posted by travelinman:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by The Big Sexy:
[

On the contrary. Yet another Palin is brought into this world without a mother. Running for office will be a 7 day a week job with little rest.

So when special needs boy and the newly illegitimate come into this world (or are they one and the same, who knows?), Sarah Palin will be nowhere to be found. Guaranteed.

[ September 02, 2008 01:28 PM: Message edited by: The Big Sexy ]

So from this I gather her husband is not capable of raising the children.

What do you know a chauvinistic fag.<hr /></blockquote>Actually, I've always felt it takes two to raise a child. It is clear in Palin's case she certainly won't be in the picture.

I don't know how one parent raises 5 (including a special needs child)- excuse me, 6, alone.

The more I read your thoughts, the funnier I think is your move to Amsterdam.

But anyway, Palin clearly is not a first choice kind of running mate, that's for sure. Without much experience behind her, she's conservative Christian secessionist reformer the middle of scandal, even as her daughter goes preggers.

On top of this, the answer is to have her 17 year old daughter get married? WTF?

So much for the institution of marriage.

There are so many fucked up things about this, it's mind boggling. She seems to embody what I so hate about the religious right.

But at least she fishes.

[ September 02, 2008 04:57 PM: Message edited by: The Big Sexy ]
September 3rd, 2008, 02:14 AM
travelinman

Your problem is that the closest you will ever get to understanding how a parent feels is when you flush that sticky tissue down the toilet.
September 3rd, 2008, 03:42 AM
reason

Quote:

Originally posted by travelinman:
Does anyone else see the BS The BS is feeding us.

If there was a ?Progressive? woman in a stable relationship wanting to become the VP he would defend her right to it, but since she is a conservative he questions her commitment to her children.

Let?s not look at the fact that her husband has quit his full time job to take care of the family.

Then there is the daughter becoming pregnant. I?m sure TBS and the rest of the liberals would think it all great if she aborted the baby. Their pissed because she chooses to carry it to term and not stick a knife in its head.

So tell me BS you ever have sex before marriage? Opps my mistake.

Your inability to understand concepts is underwhelming.

As one who opposes abortion, I think it is your typically offensive self to accuse me of wanting to put a "knife in its head."

On the contrary. Yet another Palin is brought into this world without a mother. Running for office will be a 7 day a week job with little rest.

So when special needs boy and the newly illegitimate come into this world (or are they one and the same, who knows?), Sarah Palin will be nowhere to be found. Guaranteed.

But it trav's world, that's ok. Those are conservative values. Job over family. Minivan over life. (That last one is a low blow, but Sarah Palin is doing pretty much what minivan moms do everywhere.)

Good thing she can fish, eh trav?

[ September 02, 2008 01:28 PM: Message edited by: The Big Sexy ]
September 3rd, 2008, 11:40 PM
LanDroid

WTF? --- oh forget it --- deleted...

[ September 03, 2008 08:42 PM: Message edited by: LanDroid ]
September 4th, 2008, 10:32 AM
Beachcomber

How convenient for Obama that he has a media that is willing to have a feeding frenzy on Palin's daughter and ignore his own conception. Obama's mother did the same thing, only with a married man who dumped them both. No media bias there...Oh wait, does that make Obama a BASTARD? Yeah it sure does.
September 7th, 2008, 04:46 AM
reason

Quote:

Originally posted by Beachcomber:
How convenient for Obama that he has a media that is willing to have a feeding frenzy on Palin's daughter and ignore his own conception. Obama's mother did the same thing, only with a married man who dumped them both. No media bias there...Oh wait, does that make Obama a BASTARD? Yeah it sure does.

Obama has already spoken about this and says the kid is off limits. Of course, he realizes that everyone else (except trav) will see how screwed up this is and rip on it.

I still can't get over how they think marriage is some kind of solution to this. Maybe the children should graduate high school first and have their parents help raise the child until the children are capable of doing it themselves.
September 7th, 2008, 04:50 AM
reason

Quote:

Originally posted by travelinman:
Your problem is that the closest you will ever get to understanding how a parent feels is when you flush that sticky tissue down the toilet.

I'm still trying to figure out how a single parent handles six kids - one special needs - and a daughter who is not yet ready for that responsibility.

I do find it interesting that here I'm more in tune to the demands of parenting than you who actually fathered children.
September 7th, 2008, 02:53 PM
LAKE

Quote:

Originally posted by The Big Sexy:
I do find it interesting that here I'm more in tune to the demands of parenting than you who actually fathered children.[/QB]

[img]graemlins/whatever.gif[/img]
September 8th, 2008, 01:57 AM
reason

Quote:

Originally posted by LAKE:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by The Big Sexy:
I do find it interesting that here I'm more in tune to the demands of parenting than you who actually fathered children.

[img]graemlins/whatever.gif[/img] [/QB]<hr /></blockquote>You tell me how one parent raises 6 children, one of whom is special needs, one whom is bearing a child before she graduates from high school.

I want to hear Palin's take on her voting to cut funding for sex education in Alaska's schools. Very ironical.
September 8th, 2008, 02:17 PM
Beachcomber

I think a little too much emphasis is being put on Palin for her daughter's actions. Shit happens. I would say the same thing if she were a Democrat. Does not make her a bad parent necessarily, no matter what she has taught her kids. Seems her daughter made a bad choice.
September 8th, 2008, 05:00 PM
travelinman

Don?t you know having 5 kids an being a Christian is bad but driving off a bridge when drunk and killing someone is fine?

Got to be a liberal to understand that.
September 9th, 2008, 11:00 AM
Beachcomber

I would say Ted's karma is going to catch up with him soon.
September 9th, 2008, 11:59 AM
YoSam

Quote:

Originally posted by Beachcomber:
I would say Ted's karma is going to catch up with him soon.

You mean FINALLY!
September 9th, 2008, 12:02 PM
YoSam

"Actually, I've always felt it takes two to raise a child. It is clear in Palin's case she certainly won't be in the picture."

So everyone needs to quit their jobs, stay at home, and raise their kids?
September 9th, 2008, 02:18 PM
reason

Quote:

Originally posted by YoSam:
"Actually, I've always felt it takes two to raise a child. It is clear in Palin's case she certainly won't be in the picture."

So everyone needs to quit their jobs, stay at home, and raise their kids?

If you can't keep up with the disussion, don't bother joining.

The short answer: No.
September 9th, 2008, 02:19 PM
reason

Quote:

Originally posted by travelinman:
Don?t you know having 5 kids an being a Christian is bad but driving off a bridge when drunk and killing someone is fine?

Got to be a liberal to understand that.

New lows of nonsensical babble-talk.
September 9th, 2008, 02:37 PM
reason

Quote:

Originally posted by Beachcomber:
I think a little too much emphasis is being put on Palin for her daughter's actions. Shit happens. I would say the same thing if she were a Democrat. Does not make her a bad parent necessarily, no matter what she has taught her kids. Seems her daughter made a bad choice.

I think the daughter should be left alone; HOWEVER, given Palin's family values platform, she deserves a heaping extra dose of scrutiny.

Palin kind of reminds me of my ultra-right wing Catholic uncle who sent my brother and his new wife pamphlets on birth control shortly after they got married. He also sent information about the Catholic Church (My bro's wife was Southern Baptist, so they compromised and married in a Methodist church.)

Uncle's oldest, overachieving daughter went off to the University of Michigan to get her doctorate, but instead got knocked up by a steel drum playing black dude from Trinidad (really nice guy, actually). You can pardon us for giggling in private.

(The "reception" was way more funner as all the West Indians were getting stoned outside the back door of the banquet room of a cheap Ann Arbor motel, while Uncle Bob tried to keep a straight face about all of it. Knocked up cousin first got married by the justice of the peace, and later in the Episcopal Church. It was awesome.)

Karma was a bitch for Uncle Bob. It will be for Palin, too.

[ September 09, 2008 01:46 PM: Message edited by: The Big Sexy ]
September 9th, 2008, 04:42 PM
reason

Quote:

Originally posted by YoSam:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by The Big Sexy:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by YoSam:
"Actually, I've always felt it takes two to raise a child. It is clear in Palin's case she certainly won't be in the picture."

So everyone needs to quit their jobs, stay at home, and raise their kids?

If you can't keep up with the disussion, don't bother joining.

The short answer: No.<hr /></blockquote>Keeping up w/ you is not a problem.
I just took your post to its logical conclusion.

[img]graemlins/bat.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/bat.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/bat.gif[/img] <hr /></blockquote>No...you're just not following. Go chat with greg or something.
September 9th, 2008, 07:10 PM
YoSam

Quote:

Originally posted by The Big Sexy:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by YoSam:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by The Big Sexy:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by YoSam:
"Actually, I've always felt it takes two to raise a child. It is clear in Palin's case she certainly won't be in the picture."

So everyone needs to quit their jobs, stay at home, and raise their kids?

If you can't keep up with the disussion, don't bother joining.

The short answer: No.<hr /></blockquote>Keeping up w/ you is not a problem.
I just took your post to its logical conclusion.

[img]graemlins/bat.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/bat.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/bat.gif[/img] <hr /></blockquote>No...you're just not following. Go chat with greg or something.<hr /></blockquote>And by your logic, it takes 4 to raise 2 childs, 6 to raise 3 childs, etc.
Do the math!!
September 10th, 2008, 03:19 AM
YoSam

Quote:

Originally posted by The Big Sexy:
<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by YoSam:
"Actually, I've always felt it takes two to raise a child. It is clear in Palin's case she certainly won't be in the picture."

So everyone needs to quit their jobs, stay at home, and raise their kids?

If you can't keep up with the disussion, don't bother joining.

The short answer: No.<hr /></blockquote>Keeping up w/ you is not a problem.
I just took your post to its logical conclusion.

[img]graemlins/bat.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/bat.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/bat.gif[/img]