I've noticed that there's a growing plague among theatres to charge upwards of $18 for tickets.
There was a time when I would see a show every other weekend. There was also a time when I would ask 6+ people to join me.
I make a decent income, but I simply don't want to afford to drop more than $30 for (2) tickets. And the people I know can't either.
I don't care what costs the theatre has to cover. That's not EVER an audience's concern, and the audience should NEVER have to know about the "costs" of a theatre. If the shows are worth it, they'll see them. If the shows aren't worth it, they won't.
It is a source of enjoyment and recreation, isn't it?!
Theatre isn't a WATER BILL. You don't HAVE to pay it. I would have to accept "economic" reasons why the Water Department is sticking it to me, because ultimately I have to pay them. But an "economic" reason is exactly why I WON'T do something I can't afford, RECREATIONALLY.
If I think a watercolor class is too expensive, I don't take it. If I think a theatre ticket is too expensive, I don't go.
And Ultimately I HAVE stopped going to theatres that are charging more than $15 for tickets. So, they aren't getting $18 from me, let alone $36 for two tickets or - as I paid today, for my final viewing at Wheaton Drama - $42!!!
I know FSP charges a lot for their mainstage shows, too. Well, guess what? I'm not going to them, either, if tickets are over $15.
I want to see shows all the time, and I know there are PLENTY of theatres who aren't charging so much...and putting on equally good or adequate theatre.
Which brings me to my final point.
Would I drop $60 for a pair of CHEAP tickets to Wicked? Yes. But, the gamble of seeing a good show versus a completely inadequate show is at least in my favor. If these theatres want to charge BIG BOY prices, they ought to be putting on BIG BOY shows. Period.
<font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ October 09, 2006 10:34 AM: Message edited by: Ann Marie Weinert ]</font>