I AM NOT THE BOSS -but the RULES I use to deleate some Posts

.... I will admit - I have a Family Fight Fetish. So - I am not without sin.

This brings up the whole matter of WRONG FANTASY, and what makes imaginary scenes wrong to even imagine in words. A recent example - Because of the delicacy involved in relating fights between pregnant women, (even if the babies are not targets or threatened),( like the wild but goofy fight I saw), and because of the World fascination with teen girl girl fights on You Tube I want to point out that Fetish fixations are usually formed at early puberty by strong impressive sexually charged contacts ... with boots, with big breasts, with fighting, with role warps and transgressive behaviours. Son Mommy/ Daughter Father fantasy prevalence is huge in both genders and is not really linked to actual incest at all.

The female fantasy of being subjugated and taken by force IS NOT A DESIRE TO BE RAPED. My belief is that it is wrong to confuse the language of fantasies which give private catharsis with the language of domination and diminishing used in public discourse to put one group over another. This is one area in which feminist critique has demonstrated a tin ear for distinguishing one thing from another.... especially for females as it is my experience that females have all the ranged of foibles and fetishes that males do.

Puberty Onset sex fetish frameworks is a trope of sex fantasy as is Spring/Winter liaisons between males and females and males and females in the two roles.

I am not the moderator, but MikeJV gave me the job of deleting SPAM Ads and Sex or violence with pre-teens. I let some speculation of such combats fly, but I kill minor sex materials on sight. The outright promotion of combat on such straddles the line. But honestly, Shirley Temple fought several famous fight on YouTube sites, so it also comes down to feeling tone as to if that stuff is cute or porn. But not here. Ok?

Quote:

---

My Rule as to Why I Remove a Post

Any fights under 16... even if it have no nudity or sex may be deleted.
Sex or nudity with people under 18 is also off limits.
High School (age) fights, (thanks to YouTube), are quietly allowed.

---

I think ALL FANTASY is fantasy and Constitutionally Free Speech BUT the venue has to be either PRIVATE or ACCESS CONTROLLED. No Minors. AND ....Someplace Else.

Please accept this in the sense I intend. And note: E-mail or Private Message exchanges are just that PRIVATE and protected as being off campus as far as my admin reach.

I made up this set of rules to keep hands off, but protect the board and do what I think keeps us all on the same site if not much liking some other people's threads.
PLEASE, if you must vent, vent at me, not each other. :cool:

Seems a reasonable approach. I have never done adult mixed fights without special situations because they are not realistically competitive at a street level, but always imagined a 14 vs 12 female vs male as a competitive fight. These rules would catch that as well as some of my Island plans which will probably not get written. But I fully understand the need for the policy. When taboo lines are crossed it doesn't really matter if the taboo is majority or minority held. Those who see the line light the fires and get the pitch forks and as the professor says, shit hits the fan. And these days, lynch mobs of one or two can shut down a board and lynch mobs of fifty to a hundred can get CEO's fired and create crusades that accomplish little but waste a tremendous amount of time and leave behind a battlefield ruined and pockmarked.

Anyway, thanks for clearly stating the rules. Its good to know limits. And as you say private emails passed among parties that connect through board are unlimited except by the sender's and receiver's own taboos.

And one way to avoid issue is to avoid ages altogether by furthering the physical description with height, weight, nervousness, etc. That way the reader can substitute or guess whatever type of fight they are reading about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DogWithABone

We get it peregrine, you're pro child molestation. That's sad, but not unexpected. You don't have to keep driving that point home you child diddling POS.

---

i am not pro child molestion you putz. i was defending Ted Mark cause the post was made before he was appointed to delete posts. was he suppoe to go back and review all posts before that Mike was already supposed to have checked? you are a bigger putz than Trump. you twist everything to what you want it to say to suit your means and not what is said. you said I was defending Kidman and that was not true. i want an apology from you for that.