-
Re: Pats@Ravens
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: IBA WILDCAT*</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'm thinking the Steelers will get um next week... </div></div>
Listen I would love to see that i really would but I wouldn't count on it. This team has fought for 60 mins the last 2 weeks. If they was going to lose a game this was the one. I don't think they're gonna go 16-0 but the steeler ARE NOT gonna win....
I'll put money on it....
-
Re: Pats@Ravens
I doubt the Pats will go 16-0, mainly because they play the Giants the last game of the season. The game will mean nothing to the Pats other than going 16-0, while it may mean play-offs or go home to the Giants. The Giants and the Steelers are the only ones I think may have a shot, although it would be ironic if Miami came up and smacked them. I would LOVE it!
-
Re: Pats@Ravens
I will respect your opinion...but I think the Steelers will be the one to stop um.If the Steelers get their injured players back out on the field that hasn't got to play the last few games then I have no dout they will beat um.
-
Re: Pats@Ravens
The Steelers can very well give them a good game. But what Steelers team will show up? The good team, or the mediocre team?
The Pats can get beat up and down the field, but when you've got to beat the officials as well. Brady seems to be getting frusturated these last 2 weeks. He's not been able to bulldoze the competition and have a field day, and I love it.
-
Re: Pats@Ravens
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Victory or Death</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The Steelers can very well give them a good game. But what Steelers team will show up? The good team, or the mediocre team?
The Pats can get beat up and down the field, but when you've got to beat the officials as well. Brady seems to be getting frusturated these last 2 weeks. He's not been able to bulldoze the competition and have a field day, and I love it. </div></div>
What are you talking about? You watched the game right? That was holding in the endzone man, he held him for about 8 yards. The Ravens were the ones who called the time out. What call are you talking about? Don't get me wrong yall I would love to see them go down but the Ravens lost that game. The refs didn't lose it for them! Samri Rolle said the same thing, they just flat out beat them.
As for the Steelers well we'll just have to wait and see.....
-
Re: Pats@Ravens
Would you put money on Detoilet making the playoffs? lol
-
Re: Pats@Ravens
Three maybe four weeks ago yea but as of right now NO....
-
Re: Pats@Ravens
What happened? I thought they were one of the best in the NFC? HAHA...they were a joke from start.
-
Re: Pats@Ravens
I wouldn't say that but aren't we getting off topic here?
As for your question I wouldn't know how to anwser it man. They just fell apart.
-
Re: Pats@Ravens
It doesn't matter who called the TO..the ball was snapped...as far as the holding goes, I saw illegal contact but not holding. And, as far as I'm concerned, if the ball isn't in the air, or can't be caught by a receiver, illegal contact is a crock. The DB should be able to punish the WR until the ball is in the air...when they made that rule, it basically neutered football as it was once played.