Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: paying for healthcare

  1. #11
    Inactive Member R13's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 25th, 2007
    Posts
    10,269
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: paying for healthcare

    Quote Originally Posted by Monkeyhead View Post
    He has a very valid point. What is wrong with what he said? They bring up something small as the tanning bed, would it not be better used for tobacco and alcohol?
    Small as a tanning bed? Guess you don't know how deadly skin cancer is and how rates have risen because of the use of tanning beds. A ban on those under 18, just like tobacco, is common sense. His "point" is exaggerated and ignoring common sense.

  2. #12
    Inactive Member R13's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 25th, 2007
    Posts
    10,269
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: paying for healthcare

    NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Getting a bronze glow for the summer -- at least artificially -- is about to get a little more expensive.

    A 10% tax will be tacked on to indoor tanning bills starting Thursday, as part of the health-care reform President Obama signed into law in March.

    According to guidelines from the IRS, the tax will apply to electronic products designed for tanning that use one or more ultraviolet lamps with wavelengths between 200 and 400 nanometers. Other sunless tanning options, such as spray tans, are not subject to the tariff.

    The tax is expected to generate $2.7 billion by 2019, according to the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation.

    Tanning salons are charged with collecting the levy and reporting it to the government each quarter. That money will help fund the health-reform package, which carries a price-tag of $940 billion.

    The tanning tax replaced the 5% "Botax" on cosmetic surgery that was included in earlier versions of the reform bill.

    That cosmetic surgery tax would have been levied on elective procedures like breast implants and Botox injections, but the provision was dropped last year after objections from medical and dermatological associations.
    0:00 /2:16A real hands-on job

    Those industries supported the tanning tax because of health risks associated with indoor tans. But tanning associations have hit back, arguing that health concerns are exaggerated and the tax could put salon owners out of business.

    The Indoor Tanning Association said 30 million people, or more than 10% of all Americans, tan indoors each year. The industry employs more than 140,000 people in 19,000 businesses across the country.


    Tanning 10% tax coming Thursday - Jun. 29, 2010

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •