Fox News thread...

**R13** · August 19th, 2010, 05:09 PM

Originally Posted by Counts

Sounds easy till you dismiss any sorce that diargees with you argument

I WILL agree that there is ALOT of crap sorces out there but you have in that past claimed such thins as Women do not need any type of arasol aid it is just that there man can not turn them on anymore sorces were broght to bear stateing medical reasons for such a thing then you started changing your argument and never once admited to being wrong

The only time I do really any dismissing of sources is when Beasts posts his, he constantly does that and I constantly point it out I don't remember dismissing yours and didn't dismiss pvfan's in the mosque thread and that's the only links I can remember being posted recently.

My position from the beginning to the end was that there was no "fix it" pill for it, that a boring sex life has a lot to do with it, but there are way to many factors for their to be a pill for it - the pill wasn't approved either like all of the rest of attempts to do it. What part of what I said in the thread was wrong exactly? I always said it was my opinion and it isn't just made up, it's a cause like a thousand others to the reason for it, it's not far-fetched and is backed up too.

**Counts** · August 20th, 2010, 09:12 AM

Originally Posted by R13

The only time I do really any dismissing of sources is when Beasts posts his, he constantly does that and I constantly point it out I don't remember dismissing yours and didn't dismiss pvfan's in the mosque thread and that's the only links I can remember being posted recently.

My position from the beginning to the end was that there was no "fix it" pill for it, that a boring sex life has a lot to do with it, but there are way to many factors for their to be a pill for it - the pill wasn't approved either like all of the rest of attempts to do it. What part of what I said in the thread was wrong exactly? I always said it was my opinion and it isn't just made up, it's a cause like a thousand others to the reason for it, it's not far-fetched and is backed up too.

So are you saying that there are some cases where a "Fix it" pill would help and that such a pill would have legit merit?

**CoeburnCane** · August 20th, 2010, 11:37 AM

Originally Posted by centennialdawg

I am glad one of you mods finally agree with the rest of the board about him and had the balls to finally say it in front of everyone else.

Thanks for the veiled shot at me.

And ask R13 how many times I've told him to lay off or tone down his posts via PM, and he'll tell you several. Just because I don't do it on a thread doesn't mean I'm not trying to moderate behind the scenes via PM's.

**centennialdawg** · August 20th, 2010, 12:17 PM

Not a veiled shot, just an observation that most everyone agrees with. Obviously, your "private" moderating hasn't worked terribly well. But enough of the bickering, I said what I had to say and you just proved my point. I have no favorite mod on here either. This (political forum) if it is to be run as per the sticky that Rock put up, should be sufficient and it has, for the most part.

All news agencies are biased in one way or another. MSNBC has several programs that are nothing more than veiled political propaganda programs just like FOX. Like I say, I watch CNN mostly because they are the only news source on television that is the most objective. Joy Behar on NBC is in my opinion, no better than Bill O'Reilly or anyone else. Even Anderson Cooper on CNN is a bised individual but he does it in a way that is not as blatant as the others are. Even NBC's Today Show has gotten to be a joke with the political interviews they have.

**CoeburnCane** · August 20th, 2010, 02:53 PM

Obviously, your "private" moderating hasn't worked terribly well.

I guess that's not a shot either.

This (political forum) if it is to be run as per the sticky that Rock put up, should be sufficient and it has, for the most part.

If that's the case, then what's the facking problem? If everything is running as it should be per Rock's original sticky on here (which I strive for), why is it being implied that Counts did something I didn't have the "balls" to do?

If R13's followed the rules on this board as Rock has set out--then what's the big deal? He has different POV's that people don't like/agree with, but if he's within the rules...it'd be tarded of me or another mod to throw the hammer down on him just b/c he's different than the rest.

**centennialdawg** · August 21st, 2010, 10:51 AM

Oh, Lord, I feel another power trip. But if you must, then you must. I just merely pointed out observations with which most everyone else is afraid to make for fear of your "wrath". For the technical part, you have done wonders moderating this board, but I am afraid you lose a lot after that. Chill out, sit back and relax. Go ahead and have fun. Go see a movie, go to the museum, take the wife and kids out for a while. I think you will find that it is much more relaxing than what you do now.

**Milk3** · August 21st, 2010, 04:33 PM

Originally Posted by centennialdawg

Oh, Lord, I feel another power trip. But if you must, then you must. I just merely pointed out observations with which most everyone else is afraid to make for fear of your "wrath". For the technical part, you have done wonders moderating this board, but I am afraid you lose a lot after that. Chill out, sit back and relax. Go ahead and have fun. Go see a movie, go to the museum, take the wife and kids out for a while. I think you will find that it is much more relaxing than what you do now.

Don't call him out. You'll end up banned like I did. It's easier to just drop it.