Interesting, but wrong... but interesting...

[Ronfar]

http://everythingforever.com/st_math.htm

[Biomechanoid]

Did I just read myself into a paradox? I gave up after the third or fourth time the author paused to ask, "do you see what I'm saying?" I understand it, it's just boring and repetative. Maybe they address it further in the article, but zero is much more purposeful as a location than a quantity. In the scope of infinity, and this is where they may have been on the right track, zero is the intersection of all coordinates, time, and quantities. It is not the beginning or the end. You can't answer a when, where, or how many with zero, because it is never, nowhere, and none all at once. Everything is, but zero is not. The only purpose of zero is to balance the equation, because everything cannot exist without nothing.

Do you see what I'm saying...?

[Ronfar]

heh, heh. Yeah.

But I tell you, I'll buy the "Infinite zero" stuff before I'll go near "string theory"

...I think I might be watching too much PBS

<font color="#99FFCC" size="1">[ June 22, 2006 10:56 AM: Message edited by: Ronfar ]</font>