1080p

[Matt Pacini]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Courier, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by yak:
hi,
the new 1080(p)rogressive technologie has a 4 % less solution than film, that makes me think, but anyway, i go for 4 %!

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


This is a vague statement.
4% less than WHAT film? 35mm? 16mm? Super8?

------------------

[yak]

i mean motion cinema image, i think its 35mm, but im not absolute shure, check theire site www.1080p.de i dont like it, but its future!

------------------
'be the one who is it'

[yak]

hi,
the new 1080(p)rogressive technologie has a 4 % less solution than film, that makes me think, but anyway, i go for 4 %!

------------------
'be the one who is it'

[mattias]

they don't mention much about the difference in resolution, and hardly anything at all about film, of the "motion cinema image" kind or any other. frankly you're not making sense at all being this vague...

/matt