Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: JAWS

  1. #1
    Inactive Member darthshawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 8th, 2000
    Posts
    128
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Talking

    Does anybody know how Speildberg did the zoom on the sherif when he is sitting on the chair and there is a shark attack, and how he made it look like we are being pulled in to the picture?

  2. #2
    Inactive Member MatJimMood's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 2nd, 2000
    Posts
    233
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    The shot is done by dollying in and zooming out (or vice versa) at the same time.

    The shot starts with the camera zoomed in so that the background is condensed.

    As the lense zooms out the background perspective becomes more natural and less condensed.

    The camera dollying in causes it to appear as though we are being pulled into the picture because the perspective of the Sherif doesn't change.

    Hitchcock also did a similar thing in Vertigo when James Stewart is looking down the stairway in the tower.

    Mess round with a camcorder and you should be able to get the same effect.

  3. #3
    Inactive Member MatJimMood's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 2nd, 2000
    Posts
    233
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    The shot is done by dollying in and zooming out (or vice versa) at the same time.

    The shot starts with the camera zoomed in so that the background is condensed.

    As the lense zooms out the background perspective becomes more natural and less condensed.

    The camera dollying in causes it to appear as though we are being pulled into the picture because the perspective of the Sherif doesn't change.

    Hitchcock also did a similar thing in Vertigo when James Stewart is looking down the stairway in the tower.

    Mess round with a camcorder and you should be able to get the same effect.

  4. #4
    Inactive Member MatJimMood's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 2nd, 2000
    Posts
    233
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    The shot is done by dollying in and zooming out (or vice versa) at the same time.

    The shot starts with the camera zoomed in so that the background is condensed.

    As the lense zooms out the background perspective becomes more natural and less condensed.

    The camera dollying in causes it to appear as though we are being pulled into the picture because the perspective of the Sherif doesn't change.

    Hitchcock also did a similar thing in Vertigo when James Stewart is looking down the stairway in the tower.

    Mess round with a camcorder and you should be able to get the same effect.

  5. #5
    Inactive Member MatJimMood's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 2nd, 2000
    Posts
    233
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    The sort of shot is done by dollying in and zooming out (or vice versa) at the same time.

    The shot starts zoomed in on the subject so that the background is condensed.

    As the camera zooms out the background perspective becomes more natural and less condensed.

    The way it feels as though you are pulled into the picture is caused by the camera dollying in on the Sherif. The perspective of him remains the same as the background changes.

    I'm pretty sure thats how its done. Try messing around with a camcorder and you should get a rough version of it.

    Hitchcock also did a similar thing in Vertigo where James Stewart is looking down the stairway in the tower.

  6. #6
    Inactive Member MatJimMood's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 2nd, 2000
    Posts
    233
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Whoops, sorry!!

  7. #7
    Inactive Member Matt J Heaton's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 28th, 2000
    Posts
    430
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Hehehe.


    I wondered how that affect was done. Its used alot.

  8. #8
    Inactive Member Ravenhill's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 23rd, 2000
    Posts
    26
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Post

    Actually, its the other way around.
    The camera dollies out from the actor thus increasing the amount of visible background. At the same time the camera zooms in, still keeping the actor the same size. Obviously its a Hitchcock move but it was also used to good effect by Sam Raimi in The Quick and The Dead.
    By the way, its surprisingly easy to do. A director friend of mine did the same shot from inside a moving car, reversing away from the object. Worth trying.

  9. #9
    Inactive Member cash's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 18th, 1999
    Posts
    360
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    doing it from a car works, however make sure you check behind u as i didn't and nearly went tits up down a steep hill at high speed!

    www.cashproductions.co.uk

  10. #10
    Inactive Member darthshawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 8th, 2000
    Posts
    128
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Thanks guys, you've all given me some things to mess around with.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •