-
March 18th, 2003, 09:15 AM
#21
Inactive Member
I thought Id edit and remove this post, dont want to bore y'all with my banter.
Good luck.
<font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ March 18, 2003 06:44 AM: Message edited by: eidde ]</font>
-
March 18th, 2003, 03:41 PM
#22
Inactive Member
All valid points, but heres a fact:
No one would choose dv over film on this board if cost and expertise were not an issue. It is these limitations that force us to shoot dv because film is not an option. Unless you're loaded or in film school.
Anyways I like both formats, I just like my features on film. Schlock fans don't care about image quality, or acting or script or cinematography so I have no doubt that hi-8 let alone dv will satisfy some of them.
I for one will shoot my first feature on film, unless hi-def really proves itself.
Now i'm off to crew on super 16 film. Adios for now.
-
March 18th, 2003, 06:16 PM
#23
Inactive Member
It's funny how people often use the "Star Wars episode 2 was shot on DV!" argument. Don't quote me on this one, but didn't it take like several people to move the camera, because it was so big?
That's no Sony DV Handycam if I ever saw one.
m0ds
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks