Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Feature?

  1. #21
    Inactive Member eidde's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 21st, 2003
    Posts
    362
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I thought Id edit and remove this post, dont want to bore y'all with my banter.

    Good luck.

    <font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ March 18, 2003 06:44 AM: Message edited by: eidde ]</font>

  2. #22
    Inactive Member Generic Skinhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 12th, 2001
    Posts
    1,009
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    All valid points, but heres a fact:

    No one would choose dv over film on this board if cost and expertise were not an issue. It is these limitations that force us to shoot dv because film is not an option. Unless you're loaded or in film school.

    Anyways I like both formats, I just like my features on film. Schlock fans don't care about image quality, or acting or script or cinematography so I have no doubt that hi-8 let alone dv will satisfy some of them.

    I for one will shoot my first feature on film, unless hi-def really proves itself.

    Now i'm off to crew on super 16 film. Adios for now.

  3. #23
    Inactive Member Mods's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 25th, 2001
    Posts
    687
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    It's funny how people often use the "Star Wars episode 2 was shot on DV!" argument. Don't quote me on this one, but didn't it take like several people to move the camera, because it was so big?

    That's no Sony DV Handycam if I ever saw one.

    m0ds

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •