<font size="3" face="Tempus sans ITC, Papyrus,Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That's what I can't quite figure out. I'm not entirely sure what the fanclub thinks just what various people think the fanclub thinks (lol...not that a fanclub thinks).Originally posted by Kattitude:
[QB]
I think the thing is with Fanclubs is that they seem to think that the service they are offering is some kind of discounted specialness that they have put together for fans and that everyone should be greatful for whatever they get. I dont think they think of themselves as product they are marketing to consumers.
When I think about the concept of the fanclub and the specialness of it all and we should be grateful for what we get, I can't really think of where that is the message the fanclub has specifically sent. It seems to me that is the message that some of the very happy fans have made but I'm not sure the fanclub really has said that. Since the tendency of the fanclub is really to say nothing, that is really my recollection of things...they really haven't said anything. I'm not sure the fanclub has ever said you should be grateful for what you get.
Now arguably the message may be coming based on other things...things like the fact that discussions of this nature get deleted, perceptions of a "fan heirarchy" for lack of a better term...nonverbal type things. Even the fact they say nothing can be perceived by the consumer (and I think it has been by many but clearly not all) that they really are not concerned with what fans think. To me it goes to the whole theory of communication...only 10% of communication is what you actually say. The rest comes from other things. Different fans interpret the silence, the deleted threads etc. all differently. The problem is.....the interpretation of all those indirect things may be right but it may also be wrong.
So that is why I'm not quite sure whether the fanclub thinks we should just be grateful for the opportunity to pay $30 for whatever they want to provide or whether they actually recognize that perhaps they haven't quite provided all that they advertised but are taking the ostrich in the sand approach because they don't really have a great option to fix the problem. The reason I question is the moves they make...things like changing the number of dzines, the fact they created a public board. I can't quite think of other examples at the moment but they do make changes that to me often seem to be in response to some of the criticisms they get so I'm not sure it is an attitude of be grateful for what you get. Perhaps it is a recognition of you can't please everybody all the time but I'm just not sure it is be grateful for what you get.
But....it may be.
Bookmarks