-
February 26th, 2005, 05:02 AM
#1
Inactive Member
I pulled this off of a Myspace Bulletin.
WHAT DO I WEAR TO COURT?
-
February 26th, 2005, 01:40 PM
#2
Inactive Member
What I like, is the graphic that's doing the rounds
(I've seen it at uni, but I can't find it on the Web),
which features three beleaguered-looking black kids
standing outside some war-torn hut in the middle of
Africa, holding up a piece of cardboard, which
states: "We're still safer here than at Michael
Jackson's!"
I've read the testimonies at smokinggun.com - the
dirty perv sounds guilty as hell. His behaviour
has been screemingly atypical of most pedophiles,
but his egoism, of course, has blinded him to
what the rest of of us can see. I'm also sick of
this 'genius' tag that's often lauded around
his neck. Take away Quincy Jones's productional
skills, and Jackson's ... what? A weedy R n'B
singer with a penchant for small boys.
Pfe!
D.

<font color="#FF0000" size="1">[ February 26, 2005 09:46 AM: Message edited by: Deviant D ]</font>
-
February 26th, 2005, 02:08 PM
#3
Inactive Member
Darren....He's guilty as hell.
He was guilty the first time, but it goes to show you that money can get you out of anything.
What's good about this time, is that The Judge already said that he doesn't play with the whole how much money you have, the whole money scheme. The way he said it was "If you're guilty, You're guilty".
-
February 26th, 2005, 03:03 PM
#4
Inactive Member
Generally speaking, the trial's obviously necessary,
for finally jailing him purposes, but is equally
quite farcical. For once, I'm actually on the tab-
loid's side, of squeezing as much humourous bollox
out of this as possible.
The detractors of all this - i.e. Jackson's defence,
the silly teary kids which follow Jackson around, be-
lieving in all of Jackson's delusional Messianic
cobblers, etc. - adopted the same disposition when
Gary Glitter went to trial. People couldn't believe
it; people refused to believe that someone that
loved (by the media, fans, etc.) could be guilty
of something so reprehensible.
It was only post-incarceration that victims felt
safe to finally tell their story. One poor soul
told how she, aged 8, was in bed with Glitter's
daughter (same age) one night, and found Glitter
getting into bed with the two of them, and event-
ually raping her - aged 8, and in the same bed as
his daughter! These gruesome realities are invar-
iably eschewed by sychophants (of people like
Jackson, merely because of his so-called celebrity),
and it's that blind, dumb, depressing, subjective
ignorance which really fucks me off.
D.

<font color="#FF0000" size="1">[ February 26, 2005 11:05 AM: Message edited by: Deviant D ]</font>
-
February 27th, 2005, 05:47 PM
#5
Inactive Member
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks