Originally posted by Pecky ShiFrit:
>will wait about 2 weeks...i am too busy right >now* and it is not after 4 daily hours of traject >that i am going to do that... not this upcoming >week*)... (what is your web browser ? and screen >resolution ?...i am using firefox and did not get >that problem... by curiosity*)
>i chose html because it is easier referrenced by >search motors than Flash websites and also, if >the director really needs to do updates he can >easily open the files in a type software as open >office or word... that's the reason : >simplicity...
I am using Firefox 1.0.4 to view your site. The
red text over graphics sucks.
also, it is interesting to use flash when you really need to do animation with layers,
Flash/Director can do anything, providing you
have enough fresh design ideas.
>interpolations & keys and you have to script >these animations for interactivity...
>for this website ??? i don't see the use... >indeed, the director with his wishes did not let >me think it was necessary doing a such design...
>use someting because it is "fashion" for doing >the same thing than before... it is only stupid >and heavier to load for ppl having not the adsl.
Tell your director to check out some Flash/Dir-
ector-made sites. The future is now.
>W3C, i am sorry, i absolutely don't know what it >is...
Then you probably should, post haste. W3C will
tell you if the code on your site is a crock of
shit or not.
D.
*
Bookmarks