Hey Beatle - This has ....color I think.
But I didn't care for...
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That really went against the previous line which used a reference to a part of a flower.They were moist and runny like a cats nose
In my opinion - I thought you were talking about her hair covering her eyes. her eyes being referred to as petals.
I dont think it fits to compare something to petals - only to then say they're like something else entirely.
Kinda like a double negative. People get the meaning - but they're like "technically - that doesn't make sense"..
at least that's how I saw it.
Again - I like this - for it's bare-bones style and it has promise... but I think it could use revision.
Not trying to sound picky - but you need to expand on points! SHOW US your vision through words...
for example
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">You tell us it's a "quivering frame" but what kinda frame? Quivering is the adjective - but it refers to motion as well - quivering. Describe the frame...Torn rags covered her quivering frame
possibly something like..
"Torn rags resembling outdated clothing, covered her tiny quivering frame."
But - now that I read it - that statement reads kinda like a storyline - so maybe it's not the best choice.
But the point is - your poetry seems kinda.. bare bones... like you're giving us this skeleton picture. Fill it in! Make it a living breathing person.
Because these are great peices - just need more details!
I like your works a lot - just wish there was more detail.
It's like reading a book by an author you know CAN write great stuff - but they're giving you short stories - instead of the novel you're hoping for.
Keep up the writing - but remember SHOW US what you're thinking. Don't be afraid of those details!
Bookmarks