Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: post

  1. July 12th, 2002, 02:18 AM #1
    SHATOUSHKA
    SHATOUSHKA is offline
    HB Forum Owner SHATOUSHKA's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 18th, 2001
    Posts
    22,191
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    rtho02?bcmReV9AMRIFTA7D
  2. July 31st, 2002, 10:49 PM #2
    zelazny
    zelazny is offline
    Inactive Member zelazny's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 8th, 2001
    Posts
    3,495
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    idyllic
  3. July 31st, 2002, 11:07 PM #3
    SHATOUSHKA
    SHATOUSHKA is offline
    HB Forum Owner SHATOUSHKA's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 18th, 2001
    Posts
    22,191
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    check this out:


    rtho02 1?bc7UBc9A3YkmpShM
  4. July 31st, 2002, 11:11 PM #4
    SHATOUSHKA
    SHATOUSHKA is offline
    HB Forum Owner SHATOUSHKA's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 18th, 2001
    Posts
    22,191
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    when looking at the pond (?) line, it seems
    that the second pic shows more "above ground"
    detail than that in the water.

    the second pic shows more "far away" detail,
    which is why the first pic seems more realistic.

    but then there's that issue of the closer
    detail being more prevailent in the second pic...


    hmmmm.......
« here's what i'll be needing right about now... | NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules