<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Reminds me of a powerplant they built near my childhood Missouri farm. They built a dam that impounded ~15 miles of cooling water next to a huge existing coal strip mine that provided fuel for the steam turbines. After EPA mandated reduced emissions only a few years later, they closed down the coal mine, dismantled Big David (the world's 4th largest electric shovel), and started hauling in lower-sulfer coal by rail all the way from Montana or Wyoming.Originally posted by O G:
...There was an all electric railway servicing Northern Ohio a century ago. Economics killed it. Good chance economics may bring it back...
With the economic changes that have occurred since, wouldn't it be more cost effective to implement stack scrubbers/afterburners and reopen the local mine? Did anyone consider the diesel-guzzling, emmission belching rail engines in the overall equation? Will they revisit those issues periodically to better suit current and future economic/environmental needs?
Not as long as the petro-pushers are running things they won't. Consumers aren't necessarily addicted to oil, the oil dealers/pushers just keep the alternatives out of reach. Burn them all in baths of their own boiling oil I say.
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">[ August 17, 2008 05:37 PM: Message edited by: bfish ]</font>
Bookmarks