It's called the "golden" rule or ratio. It can be bent via certain compromises. You'll find that "hifi" is precisely the point where satisfaction meets compromise, a differing point for most of us.1- Is there a certain ratio between the HxWxD of and enclosure? XCan they be played with as long as one maintains the same volume?
You're comparing two very different enclosure types, the A7 is a constrained throat midbass horn with exaggerated bass reflex volume in an attempt to extend the usable LF response. The 620 is a "golden ratio" bass reflex cabinet. The 411 woofer doesn't belong in either of them.2- What's the reasoning behing covering part of the woofer cone in the A7 vs having the whole thing exposed as in the 620?
Yes they can. They were made removable to accept internal horn mounting for both the 811 and 511 horns while observing more or less proper port area. There are many discussions here and at other forums on the topic of "re-tuning" the A7 port.3- Can the two bottom panels on the A7 be made as one? I can't see nay reason for having two.
It's not per se`, more critical is the alignment of the acoustic centers of the horn/driver combination with that of the woofer.4- How critical is it to align the voice coils above each other as opposed to being staggered?
This is just my .02, there are others here with far far more knowledge than i, and there will likely be some dissent from what is considered "ideal" A7 tuning.
You might also look at some of the other fairly fresh 411 discussions here on this board to get an idea of the best use for them.
Bookmarks